View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Optical characterisation and vision quality assessment of two myopia control contact lenses.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Optical characterisation and vision quality assessment of two myopia control contact lenses.
Authors: Richards, Josh (AUTHOR), Jaskulski, Matt (AUTHOR), Woods, Jill (AUTHOR), Guthrie, Sarah (AUTHOR), Kollbaum, Pete (AUTHOR)
Source: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics. Jul2025, Vol. 45 Issue 5, p1142-1150. 9p.
Subjects: Contact lenses, Vision, Visual acuity, Myopia, Optical aberrations, CooperVision Inc., Focus (Optics), Optical measurements, Clinical trials
Abstract: Purpose: This investigation examined the image and vision quality of two commercially available daily disposable myopia control soft contact lenses. Methods: Wavefront errors were measured with an SHS Ophthalmic aberrometer for two myopia control soft contact lenses: a coaxially designed dual‐focus lens (omafilcon A, CooperVision MiSight® 1 day, MS1d) and a design employing multiple add powers that included non‐coaxial optics in annular add zones (senofilcon A, Johnson & Johnson Vision ACUVUE® Abiliti™ 1‐Day, AB). Geometric optics ray tracing generated point‐spread functions and wave optics were used to compare modulation transfer functions (MTFs) and simulated letter images. Twenty‐six myopic children completed a randomised, non‐dispensing, contralateral double‐masked clinical trial. After 1 h of wear, right and left eye visual acuity (VA), subjective vision quality and lens preference (Likert) were assessed while viewing monocularly. Results: The lens containing non‐coaxial optics employed a small central zone with approximately +10.00 D of added power and two annular rings with a power gradient typical of non‐coaxial optics. The coaxial design contained a centre zone with a distance correction and two annular zones with a fixed add power of approximately +2.00 D. MTFs and simulated images were better with small pupils, which was most noticeable with the coaxial design. Distance VA was ‐0.02 ± 0.04 with MS1d and 0.09 ± 0.08 with AB, p < 0.01. The majority of participants (77%) reported a preference for one lens; 54% preferred the MS1d and 23% preferred the AB lens. Conclusions: Myopia control contact lenses employing coaxial or a mixture of coaxial and non‐coaxial optics both reduced retinal image contrast but successfully imaged high spatial frequencies and provided high quality of vision. Image and vision quality were slightly superior in the lens employing coaxial optics alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 185862857
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Optical characterisation and vision quality assessment of two myopia control contact lenses.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Richards%2C+Josh%22&quot;&gt;Richards, Josh&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Jaskulski%2C+Matt%22&quot;&gt;Jaskulski, Matt&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Woods%2C+Jill%22&quot;&gt;Woods, Jill&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Guthrie%2C+Sarah%22&quot;&gt;Guthrie, Sarah&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Kollbaum%2C+Pete%22&quot;&gt;Kollbaum, Pete&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Ophthalmic+%26+Physiological+Optics%22&quot;&gt;Ophthalmic &amp; Physiological Optics&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Jul2025, Vol. 45 Issue 5, p1142-1150. 9p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Contact+lenses%22&quot;&gt;Contact lenses&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Vision%22&quot;&gt;Vision&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Visual+acuity%22&quot;&gt;Visual acuity&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Myopia%22&quot;&gt;Myopia&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Optical+aberrations%22&quot;&gt;Optical aberrations&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22CooperVision+Inc%2E%22&quot;&gt;CooperVision Inc.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Focus+%28Optics%29%22&quot;&gt;Focus (Optics)&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Optical+measurements%22&quot;&gt;Optical measurements&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Clinical+trials%22&quot;&gt;Clinical trials&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: This investigation examined the image and vision quality of two commercially available daily disposable myopia control soft contact lenses. Methods: Wavefront errors were measured with an SHS Ophthalmic aberrometer for two myopia control soft contact lenses: a coaxially designed dual‐focus lens (omafilcon A, CooperVision MiSight&#174; 1 day, MS1d) and a design employing multiple add powers that included non‐coaxial optics in annular add zones (senofilcon A, Johnson &amp; Johnson Vision ACUVUE&#174; Abiliti™ 1‐Day, AB). Geometric optics ray tracing generated point‐spread functions and wave optics were used to compare modulation transfer functions (MTFs) and simulated letter images. Twenty‐six myopic children completed a randomised, non‐dispensing, contralateral double‐masked clinical trial. After 1 h of wear, right and left eye visual acuity (VA), subjective vision quality and lens preference (Likert) were assessed while viewing monocularly. Results: The lens containing non‐coaxial optics employed a small central zone with approximately +10.00 D of added power and two annular rings with a power gradient typical of non‐coaxial optics. The coaxial design contained a centre zone with a distance correction and two annular zones with a fixed add power of approximately +2.00 D. MTFs and simulated images were better with small pupils, which was most noticeable with the coaxial design. Distance VA was ‐0.02 &#177; 0.04 with MS1d and 0.09 &#177; 0.08 with AB, p &lt; 0.01. The majority of participants (77%) reported a preference for one lens; 54% preferred the MS1d and 23% preferred the AB lens. Conclusions: Myopia control contact lenses employing coaxial or a mixture of coaxial and non‐coaxial optics both reduced retinal image contrast but successfully imaged high spatial frequencies and provided high quality of vision. Image and vision quality were slightly superior in the lens employing coaxial optics alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Ophthalmic &amp; Physiological Optics is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=185862857
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/opo.13521
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 1142
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Contact lenses
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Vision
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Visual acuity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Myopia
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Optical aberrations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: CooperVision Inc.
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Focus (Optics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Optical measurements
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Clinical trials
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Optical characterisation and vision quality assessment of two myopia control contact lenses.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Richards, Josh
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jaskulski, Matt
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Woods, Jill
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Guthrie, Sarah
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kollbaum, Pete
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 02755408
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 45
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics
              Type: main
ResultId 1