View in EDS

Female Permanent Contraception Procedures Surrounding the Dobbs v. Jackson Ruling at a Single Institution.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Female Permanent Contraception Procedures Surrounding the Dobbs v. Jackson Ruling at a Single Institution.
Authors: Lulseged, Bethlehem A., Rockwell, Tori L., Wang, Karen C., Sufrin, Carolyn B., Burke, Anne E., Stone, Rebecca L., Frost, Anja S.
Source: Journal of Women's Health (15409996). Jun2025, Vol. 34 Issue 6, p810-816. 7p.
Subjects: Abortion laws, Contraception laws, Abortion in the United States, Family planning, Insurance, Retrospective studies, Chi-squared test, Descriptive statistics, Hospitals, Race, Reproductive rights, Comparative studies
Geographic Terms: United States
Abstract: Introduction: On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Jackson Women's Health Organization in Dobbs v. Jackson (2022), reversing the constitutional right to abortion. We aimed to describe the number of interval female permanent contraception procedures at a single institution surrounding the Dobbs v. Jackson ruling. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of permanent contraception procedures using relevant Current Procedural Terminology codes at one academic institution between June 2019 and May 2023. Contraception procedures across three, year-long preruling and one, year-long postruling periods were compared with one another; they were then also compared to percent changes in hysteroscopy procedures—a representation of average gynecological surgical volume. To reduce the impact of coronavirus, chi-square and difference-in-mean-proportions tests explored significance in the number of procedures during the 6/24/19–6/23/20 preruling and the 6/24/22–5/25/23 postruling period. Results: There were 913 contraception procedures performed: 611 in the preruling period and 302 in the postruling period. A 62.4% increase in procedures occurred between preruling period 1 (n = 186) and the postruling period (n = 302), and a 49.5% increase occurred between the 3-year preruling average (n = 202) and the postruling period. Relative to hysteroscopy procedures, there was a 44.6% and 39.3% increase in contraception procedures between preruling period 1 and the postruling period and the 3-year preruling average and the postruling period, respectively. A higher proportion of White and privately insured patients (p < 0.001, p < 0.001) underwent procedures postruling. Conclusions: Permanent contraception procedures increased following the Dobbs ruling, with differences found by race and insurance type. Further research is needed to explore the causes of increased procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Women's Health (15409996) is the property of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 185862962
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Female Permanent Contraception Procedures Surrounding the Dobbs v. Jackson Ruling at a Single Institution.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Lulseged%2C+Bethlehem+A%2E%22&quot;&gt;Lulseged, Bethlehem A.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Rockwell%2C+Tori+L%2E%22&quot;&gt;Rockwell, Tori L.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Wang%2C+Karen+C%2E%22&quot;&gt;Wang, Karen C.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Sufrin%2C+Carolyn+B%2E%22&quot;&gt;Sufrin, Carolyn B.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Burke%2C+Anne+E%2E%22&quot;&gt;Burke, Anne E.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Stone%2C+Rebecca+L%2E%22&quot;&gt;Stone, Rebecca L.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Frost%2C+Anja+S%2E%22&quot;&gt;Frost, Anja S.&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Journal+of+Women&#39;s+Health+%2815409996%29%22&quot;&gt;Journal of Women&#39;s Health (15409996)&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Jun2025, Vol. 34 Issue 6, p810-816. 7p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Abortion+laws%22&quot;&gt;Abortion laws&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Contraception+laws%22&quot;&gt;Contraception laws&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Abortion+in+the+United+States%22&quot;&gt;Abortion in the United States&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Family+planning%22&quot;&gt;Family planning&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Insurance%22&quot;&gt;Insurance&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Retrospective+studies%22&quot;&gt;Retrospective studies&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Chi-squared+test%22&quot;&gt;Chi-squared test&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Descriptive+statistics%22&quot;&gt;Descriptive statistics&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Hospitals%22&quot;&gt;Hospitals&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Race%22&quot;&gt;Race&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Reproductive+rights%22&quot;&gt;Reproductive rights&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Comparative+studies%22&quot;&gt;Comparative studies&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22United+States%22&quot;&gt;United States&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Introduction: On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Jackson Women&#39;s Health Organization in Dobbs v. Jackson (2022), reversing the constitutional right to abortion. We aimed to describe the number of interval female permanent contraception procedures at a single institution surrounding the Dobbs v. Jackson ruling. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of permanent contraception procedures using relevant Current Procedural Terminology codes at one academic institution between June 2019 and May 2023. Contraception procedures across three, year-long preruling and one, year-long postruling periods were compared with one another; they were then also compared to percent changes in hysteroscopy procedures—a representation of average gynecological surgical volume. To reduce the impact of coronavirus, chi-square and difference-in-mean-proportions tests explored significance in the number of procedures during the 6/24/19–6/23/20 preruling and the 6/24/22–5/25/23 postruling period. Results: There were 913 contraception procedures performed: 611 in the preruling period and 302 in the postruling period. A 62.4% increase in procedures occurred between preruling period 1 (n = 186) and the postruling period (n = 302), and a 49.5% increase occurred between the 3-year preruling average (n = 202) and the postruling period. Relative to hysteroscopy procedures, there was a 44.6% and 39.3% increase in contraception procedures between preruling period 1 and the postruling period and the 3-year preruling average and the postruling period, respectively. A higher proportion of White and privately insured patients (p &lt; 0.001, p &lt; 0.001) underwent procedures postruling. Conclusions: Permanent contraception procedures increased following the Dobbs ruling, with differences found by race and insurance type. Further research is needed to explore the causes of increased procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Journal of Women&#39;s Health (15409996) is the property of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=185862962
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0368
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 810
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Abortion laws
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Contraception laws
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Abortion in the United States
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Family planning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Insurance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Retrospective studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Chi-squared test
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hospitals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Race
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reproductive rights
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Female Permanent Contraception Procedures Surrounding the Dobbs v. Jackson Ruling at a Single Institution.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lulseged, Bethlehem A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rockwell, Tori L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wang, Karen C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sufrin, Carolyn B.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Burke, Anne E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stone, Rebecca L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Frost, Anja S.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 15409996
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 34
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Women's Health (15409996)
              Type: main
ResultId 1