The Efficacy and Acceptability of Non‐Invasive Brain Stimulation Interventions for Obsessive‐Compulsive Disorder Management: A Network Meta‐Analysis Based on 24 Stimulation Methods.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Efficacy and Acceptability of Non‐Invasive Brain Stimulation Interventions for Obsessive‐Compulsive Disorder Management: A Network Meta‐Analysis Based on 24 Stimulation Methods.
Authors: Tseng, Ping‐Tao (AUTHOR), Hsu, Chih‐Wei (AUTHOR), Hung, Chao‐Ming (AUTHOR), Liang, Chih‐Sung (AUTHOR), Wang, Hung‐Yu (AUTHOR), Stubbs, Brendon (AUTHOR), Carvalho, Andre F. (AUTHOR), Brunoni, Andre R. (AUTHOR), Su, Kuan‐Pin (AUTHOR), Tu, Yu‐Kang (AUTHOR), Wu, Yi‐Cheng (AUTHOR), Chen, Tien‐Yu (AUTHOR), Li, Dian‐Jeng (AUTHOR), Lin, Pao‐Yen (AUTHOR), Chen, Yen‐Wen (AUTHOR), Hung, Kuo‐Chuan (AUTHOR), Chen, Jiann‐Jy (AUTHOR), Zeng, Bing‐Syuan (AUTHOR), Li, Cheng‐Ta (AUTHOR)
Source: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. Aug2025, Vol. 152 Issue 2, p112-124. 13p.
Subjects: Obsessive-compulsive disorder, Brain stimulation, Transcranial direct current stimulation, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Acceptance (Psychology), Clinical trials, Bayesian analysis
Abstract: Introduction: Despite the high lifetime prevalence and elevated disability rates, treatments for obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) have limited efficacy. Considering the abnormal connectivity in the cortical‐striatal‐thalamic‐cortical loop circuits in OCD, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have addressed the efficacy of different non‐invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) modalities for the management of OCD. However, these RCTs yielded inconclusive results. Methods: This network meta‐analysis (NMA) included RCTs of NIBS interventions, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and various repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), in OCD patients. The primary outcomes were changes in the overall severity of OCD and acceptability (i.e., dropout rates). Results: This NMA of 34 eligible RCTs (1089 participants) and 24 different NIBS interventions revealed that three NIBS interventions significantly improved overall OCD severity compared with sham controls, which were high‐frequency rTMS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) [mean difference (MD) = −10.81, 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) = −20.80 to −0.82], high‐frequency deep TMS over the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex/anterior cingulate cortex (dmPFC/ACC) (MD = −9.74, 95% CIs = −16.42 to −3.06), and low‐frequency rTMS over the right DLPFC (MD = −4.70, 95% CIs = −8.84 to −0.57). Conclusions: This study highlighted that excitatory stimulation over the dmPFC/ACC and bilateral DLPFC, or inhibitory stimulation over the right DLPFC, was associated with significant improvements in overall OCD severity. Further large‐scale RCTs with longer follow‐up periods are needed to investigate the true impact of NIBS‐based intervention to manage OCD. Trial Registration:PROSPERO: CRD42023394953 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 186312587
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Efficacy and Acceptability of Non‐Invasive Brain Stimulation Interventions for Obsessive‐Compulsive Disorder Management: A Network Meta‐Analysis Based on 24 Stimulation Methods.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tseng%2C+Ping‐Tao%22">Tseng, Ping‐Tao</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hsu%2C+Chih‐Wei%22">Hsu, Chih‐Wei</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hung%2C+Chao‐Ming%22">Hung, Chao‐Ming</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Liang%2C+Chih‐Sung%22">Liang, Chih‐Sung</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Hung‐Yu%22">Wang, Hung‐Yu</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stubbs%2C+Brendon%22">Stubbs, Brendon</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Carvalho%2C+Andre+F%2E%22">Carvalho, Andre F.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brunoni%2C+Andre+R%2E%22">Brunoni, Andre R.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Su%2C+Kuan‐Pin%22">Su, Kuan‐Pin</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tu%2C+Yu‐Kang%22">Tu, Yu‐Kang</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wu%2C+Yi‐Cheng%22">Wu, Yi‐Cheng</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chen%2C+Tien‐Yu%22">Chen, Tien‐Yu</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Li%2C+Dian‐Jeng%22">Li, Dian‐Jeng</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lin%2C+Pao‐Yen%22">Lin, Pao‐Yen</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chen%2C+Yen‐Wen%22">Chen, Yen‐Wen</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hung%2C+Kuo‐Chuan%22">Hung, Kuo‐Chuan</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chen%2C+Jiann‐Jy%22">Chen, Jiann‐Jy</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zeng%2C+Bing‐Syuan%22">Zeng, Bing‐Syuan</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Li%2C+Cheng‐Ta%22">Li, Cheng‐Ta</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Acta+Psychiatrica+Scandinavica%22">Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica</searchLink>. Aug2025, Vol. 152 Issue 2, p112-124. 13p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Obsessive-compulsive+disorder%22">Obsessive-compulsive disorder</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Brain+stimulation%22">Brain stimulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Transcranial+direct+current+stimulation%22">Transcranial direct current stimulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Transcranial+magnetic+stimulation%22">Transcranial magnetic stimulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Acceptance+%28Psychology%29%22">Acceptance (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+trials%22">Clinical trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bayesian+analysis%22">Bayesian analysis</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Introduction: Despite the high lifetime prevalence and elevated disability rates, treatments for obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) have limited efficacy. Considering the abnormal connectivity in the cortical‐striatal‐thalamic‐cortical loop circuits in OCD, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have addressed the efficacy of different non‐invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) modalities for the management of OCD. However, these RCTs yielded inconclusive results. Methods: This network meta‐analysis (NMA) included RCTs of NIBS interventions, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and various repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), in OCD patients. The primary outcomes were changes in the overall severity of OCD and acceptability (i.e., dropout rates). Results: This NMA of 34 eligible RCTs (1089 participants) and 24 different NIBS interventions revealed that three NIBS interventions significantly improved overall OCD severity compared with sham controls, which were high‐frequency rTMS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) [mean difference (MD) = −10.81, 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) = −20.80 to −0.82], high‐frequency deep TMS over the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex/anterior cingulate cortex (dmPFC/ACC) (MD = −9.74, 95% CIs = −16.42 to −3.06), and low‐frequency rTMS over the right DLPFC (MD = −4.70, 95% CIs = −8.84 to −0.57). Conclusions: This study highlighted that excitatory stimulation over the dmPFC/ACC and bilateral DLPFC, or inhibitory stimulation over the right DLPFC, was associated with significant improvements in overall OCD severity. Further large‐scale RCTs with longer follow‐up periods are needed to investigate the true impact of NIBS‐based intervention to manage OCD. Trial Registration:PROSPERO: CRD42023394953 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=186312587
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/acps.13809
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 13
        StartPage: 112
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Obsessive-compulsive disorder
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Brain stimulation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Transcranial direct current stimulation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Transcranial magnetic stimulation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Acceptance (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Clinical trials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Bayesian analysis
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Efficacy and Acceptability of Non‐Invasive Brain Stimulation Interventions for Obsessive‐Compulsive Disorder Management: A Network Meta‐Analysis Based on 24 Stimulation Methods.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tseng, Ping‐Tao
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hsu, Chih‐Wei
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hung, Chao‐Ming
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Liang, Chih‐Sung
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wang, Hung‐Yu
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stubbs, Brendon
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Carvalho, Andre F.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Brunoni, Andre R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Su, Kuan‐Pin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tu, Yu‐Kang
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wu, Yi‐Cheng
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chen, Tien‐Yu
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Li, Dian‐Jeng
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lin, Pao‐Yen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chen, Yen‐Wen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hung, Kuo‐Chuan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chen, Jiann‐Jy
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zeng, Bing‐Syuan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Li, Cheng‐Ta
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0001690X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 152
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
              Type: main
ResultId 1