Rechargeable and Nonrechargeable Implantable Pulse Generators for Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Long‐Term Experience.
Saved in:
| Title: | Rechargeable and Nonrechargeable Implantable Pulse Generators for Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Long‐Term Experience. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Antenucci, Pietro (AUTHOR), Colucci, Fabiana (AUTHOR), Gozzi, Andrea (AUTHOR), Angelini, Chiara (AUTHOR), Cavallo, Michele Alessandro (AUTHOR), Scerrati, Alba (AUTHOR), Casetta, Ilaria (AUTHOR), Sensi, Mariachiara (AUTHOR), S. Andalibi, Mohammadsobhan (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 7/22/2025, Vol. 2025, p1-11. 11p. |
| Subjects: | Deep brain stimulation, Parkinson's disease, Surgical complications, Treatment effectiveness, Pulse generators, Hospital care, Satisfaction |
| Abstract: | Objectives: The study's objective is to assess long‐term experience with rechargeable (r‐IPG) and nonrechargeable implant pulse generators (nr‐IPGs) for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD). Material and Methods: Qualitative semistructured interviews, clinical outcomes, and care load estimations were retrospectively collected for a PD‐DBS population implanted at our center from 2006 to 2022. Results: Thirty‐seven nr‐IPG patients (follow‐up 85.3 ± 32.0 months) and 43 r‐IPG patients (follow‐up 73.1 ± 7.7 months) were analyzed. Long‐term satisfaction was sustained in both groups (100% of r‐IPG carriers and 75.7% of nr‐IPGs, p = 0.001). In r‐IPGs, 97.7% recharged the battery easily, and recharging time did not impact everyday life. The percentage of malfunctioning problems (32.6%) in the r‐IPG group was in line with previous observations on short‐term follow‐ups. The size of the IPG was considered too big for 16.2% and 4.2% for nr‐IPGs and r‐IPGs (p = 0.086), and concerns of interventions for IPG replacements were still present in the nr‐IPG group (48.6%). The total amount of days of hospitalization (19.6 ± 9.9 vs. 9.3 ± 4.8, p < 0.001) and the number of complications after the first implant (13 vs. 5, p < 0.05) and during subsequent admissions for IPG substitutions (4 vs. 0, p < 0.05) were higher for the nr‐IPGs. Conclusions: The overall level of long‐term satisfaction with IPGs is consistent over time regardless of type. R‐IPGs reported no discomfort with recharging even in the long‐term evaluation. IPG replacement surgeries and sizes are still a concern, especially for the nr‐IPG carriers, but did not affect a high level of sustained satisfaction. Resource burden remains higher for nr‐IPGs even in the long term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Acta Neurologica Scandinavica is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 186810300 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Rechargeable and Nonrechargeable Implantable Pulse Generators for Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Long‐Term Experience. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Antenucci%2C+Pietro%22">Antenucci, Pietro</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Colucci%2C+Fabiana%22">Colucci, Fabiana</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gozzi%2C+Andrea%22">Gozzi, Andrea</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Angelini%2C+Chiara%22">Angelini, Chiara</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cavallo%2C+Michele+Alessandro%22">Cavallo, Michele Alessandro</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Scerrati%2C+Alba%22">Scerrati, Alba</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Casetta%2C+Ilaria%22">Casetta, Ilaria</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sensi%2C+Mariachiara%22">Sensi, Mariachiara</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22S%2E+Andalibi%2C+Mohammadsobhan%22">S. Andalibi, Mohammadsobhan</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Acta+Neurologica+Scandinavica%22">Acta Neurologica Scandinavica</searchLink>. 7/22/2025, Vol. 2025, p1-11. 11p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Deep+brain+stimulation%22">Deep brain stimulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Parkinson's+disease%22">Parkinson's disease</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surgical+complications%22">Surgical complications</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Treatment+effectiveness%22">Treatment effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pulse+generators%22">Pulse generators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hospital+care%22">Hospital care</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Satisfaction%22">Satisfaction</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Objectives: The study's objective is to assess long‐term experience with rechargeable (r‐IPG) and nonrechargeable implant pulse generators (nr‐IPGs) for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD). Material and Methods: Qualitative semistructured interviews, clinical outcomes, and care load estimations were retrospectively collected for a PD‐DBS population implanted at our center from 2006 to 2022. Results: Thirty‐seven nr‐IPG patients (follow‐up 85.3 ± 32.0 months) and 43 r‐IPG patients (follow‐up 73.1 ± 7.7 months) were analyzed. Long‐term satisfaction was sustained in both groups (100% of r‐IPG carriers and 75.7% of nr‐IPGs, p = 0.001). In r‐IPGs, 97.7% recharged the battery easily, and recharging time did not impact everyday life. The percentage of malfunctioning problems (32.6%) in the r‐IPG group was in line with previous observations on short‐term follow‐ups. The size of the IPG was considered too big for 16.2% and 4.2% for nr‐IPGs and r‐IPGs (p = 0.086), and concerns of interventions for IPG replacements were still present in the nr‐IPG group (48.6%). The total amount of days of hospitalization (19.6 ± 9.9 vs. 9.3 ± 4.8, p < 0.001) and the number of complications after the first implant (13 vs. 5, p < 0.05) and during subsequent admissions for IPG substitutions (4 vs. 0, p < 0.05) were higher for the nr‐IPGs. Conclusions: The overall level of long‐term satisfaction with IPGs is consistent over time regardless of type. R‐IPGs reported no discomfort with recharging even in the long‐term evaluation. IPG replacement surgeries and sizes are still a concern, especially for the nr‐IPG carriers, but did not affect a high level of sustained satisfaction. Resource burden remains higher for nr‐IPGs even in the long term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Acta Neurologica Scandinavica is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=186810300 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1155/ane/6097313 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Deep brain stimulation Type: general – SubjectFull: Parkinson's disease Type: general – SubjectFull: Surgical complications Type: general – SubjectFull: Treatment effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Pulse generators Type: general – SubjectFull: Hospital care Type: general – SubjectFull: Satisfaction Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Rechargeable and Nonrechargeable Implantable Pulse Generators for Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Long‐Term Experience. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Antenucci, Pietro – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Colucci, Fabiana – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gozzi, Andrea – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Angelini, Chiara – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cavallo, Michele Alessandro – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Scerrati, Alba – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Casetta, Ilaria – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sensi, Mariachiara – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: S. Andalibi, Mohammadsobhan IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 22 M: 07 Text: 7/22/2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00016314 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 2025 Titles: – TitleFull: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |