View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

What sways public opinion? An experimental study on moral vs. evidence-based arguments for drug harm reduction.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: What sways public opinion? An experimental study on moral vs. evidence-based arguments for drug harm reduction.
Authors: Ruiz Flores López, Pamela (AUTHOR), Sánchez Hiza, Óscar (AUTHOR), Zizumbo-Colunga, Daniel (AUTHOR), Cruz Lathrop, Rocío (AUTHOR), Vásquez Salazar, Juan Camilo (AUTHOR)
Source: Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy. Aug2025, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p358-368. 11p.
Subjects: Substance abuse prevention, Drug control, Health attitudes, Health policy, Statistical sampling, Health, Public opinion, Information resources, Decision making, Harm reduction, Ethics, Experimental design, Surveys, Communication, Health behavior, Health education, Drug laws, Public health, Social support, Practical politics, Regression analysis, Social stigma
Geographic Terms: Mexico
Abstract: Background: Unlike evidence-based approaches, public drug policies are shaped more by political factors, with public opinion playing a key role. We hypothesized that using moral arguments in favor of harm reduction would carry greater levels of support in public opinion over empirical evidence arguments in favor of harm reduction. Methods: Based on the experimental methodology embedded within an omnibus survey, we employed a convenience sample consisting of 635 observations, with the survey conducted in Mexico. Participants were presented with either a moral or empirical evidence argument in favor of harm reduction. They then answered questions regarding their support for harm reduction (Support), willingness to donate to a harm reduction NGO (Donation), and willingness to vote for a candidate who supports harm reduction (Vote). Results: Willingness to donate to harm reduction was associated with moral arguments', and we found that conservatives showed greater support for harm reduction when presented with a moral argument. Conclusion: The use of moral arguments in favor of harm reduction is related to greater public support. These results have significant implications for attracting donations to harm reduction organizations and to improve the acceptance of conservatives of measures related to the model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 186911515
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: What sways public opinion? An experimental study on moral vs. evidence-based arguments for drug harm reduction.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ruiz+Flores+López%2C+Pamela%22">Ruiz Flores López, Pamela</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sánchez+Hiza%2C+Óscar%22">Sánchez Hiza, Óscar</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zizumbo-Colunga%2C+Daniel%22">Zizumbo-Colunga, Daniel</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cruz+Lathrop%2C+Rocío%22">Cruz Lathrop, Rocío</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vásquez+Salazar%2C+Juan+Camilo%22">Vásquez Salazar, Juan Camilo</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Drugs%3A+Education%2C+Prevention+%26+Policy%22">Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy</searchLink>. Aug2025, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p358-368. 11p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Substance+abuse+prevention%22">Substance abuse prevention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Drug+control%22">Drug control</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+attitudes%22">Health attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+policy%22">Health policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+sampling%22">Statistical sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health%22">Health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+opinion%22">Public opinion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+resources%22">Information resources</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making%22">Decision making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Harm+reduction%22">Harm reduction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experimental+design%22">Experimental design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communication%22">Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+behavior%22">Health behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+education%22">Health education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Drug+laws%22">Drug laws</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+health%22">Public health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+support%22">Social support</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Practical+politics%22">Practical politics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regression+analysis%22">Regression analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+stigma%22">Social stigma</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mexico%22">Mexico</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Unlike evidence-based approaches, public drug policies are shaped more by political factors, with public opinion playing a key role. We hypothesized that using moral arguments in favor of harm reduction would carry greater levels of support in public opinion over empirical evidence arguments in favor of harm reduction. Methods: Based on the experimental methodology embedded within an omnibus survey, we employed a convenience sample consisting of 635 observations, with the survey conducted in Mexico. Participants were presented with either a moral or empirical evidence argument in favor of harm reduction. They then answered questions regarding their support for harm reduction (Support), willingness to donate to a harm reduction NGO (Donation), and willingness to vote for a candidate who supports harm reduction (Vote). Results: Willingness to donate to harm reduction was associated with moral arguments', and we found that conservatives showed greater support for harm reduction when presented with a moral argument. Conclusion: The use of moral arguments in favor of harm reduction is related to greater public support. These results have significant implications for attracting donations to harm reduction organizations and to improve the acceptance of conservatives of measures related to the model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=186911515
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/09687637.2024.2440413
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 358
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Substance abuse prevention
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Drug control
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical sampling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public opinion
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Information resources
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Decision making
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Harm reduction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Experimental design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Surveys
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health behavior
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Drug laws
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public health
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social support
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Practical politics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Regression analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social stigma
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mexico
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: What sways public opinion? An experimental study on moral vs. evidence-based arguments for drug harm reduction.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ruiz Flores López, Pamela
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sánchez Hiza, Óscar
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zizumbo-Colunga, Daniel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cruz Lathrop, Rocío
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Vásquez Salazar, Juan Camilo
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09687637
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 32
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy
              Type: main
ResultId 1