A comparative study of treatment retention in opioid use disorder: Subcutaneous injectable versus sublingual buprenorphine.
Saved in:
| Title: | A comparative study of treatment retention in opioid use disorder: Subcutaneous injectable versus sublingual buprenorphine. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Deng, Charles, Oviedo, Enrique, Fishman, Marc, Burgess‐Hull, Albert |
| Source: | Addiction. Oct2025, Vol. 120 Issue 10, p2127-2133. 7p. |
| Subjects: | Substance abuse, Sublingual drug administration, Controlled release preparations, Research funding, Scientific observation, Treatment effectiveness, Retrospective studies, Descriptive statistics, Longitudinal method, Kaplan-Meier estimator, Comparative studies, Data analysis software, Confidence intervals, Narcotic antagonists, Buprenorphine, Subcutaneous injections, Proportional hazards models, Evaluation |
| Geographic Terms: | Maryland |
| Abstract: | Background and aims: Buprenorphine treatment for opioid‐use disorder (OUD) is commonly available in both sublingual tablets/films and extended‐release subcutaneous injections; however, little is known about differences in patient retention between these two buprenorphine formulations. This study measured retention differences between patients who transitioned from sublingual to subcutaneous injectable buprenorphine and those who remained on sublingual buprenorphine throughout treatment, within a multi‐location outpatient addiction treatment practice. Design and setting: This study was an observational propensity score‐matched cohort study conducted at a multi‐location outpatient addiction practice in Maryland, USA. Participants: Participants included 3609 patients receiving buprenorphine treatment for OUD between June 2019 and February 2024. Measurements: Patient demographics, health history and urine toxicology results. The primary outcome was time‐to‐dropout in days. Kaplan–Meier and Cox Proportional Hazard models with propensity score matching were used to compare treatment retention between injectable and sublingual buprenorphine receipt. Findings Overall, 538 patients at the time of their first extended‐release buprenorphine injection (INJ) were matched with 538 patients only receiving sublingual buprenorphine (SUB‐only). In the unmatched sample, INJ patients were more likely than SUB‐only patients to be female (INJ 47.2% vs SUB‐only 38.7%, P < 0.001) and more likely to have at least an associate's degree (41.4% vs 33.9%, P < 0.001). After matching, patients who transitioned to INJ buprenorphine had lower retention in treatment compared with patients who remained on SUB buprenorphine. Median (95% confidence interval) time‐to‐dropout was 269 days (218–313) for INJ patients compared with 389 days (313–592) for SUB‐only patients (stratified log‐rank test = 13.6, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Among patients receiving medication treatment for opioid use disorder in an outpatient setting, those who transitioned from sublingual to subcutaneous injectable buprenorphine were at an increased risk for dropout compared with matched patients who only received sublingual buprenorphine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Addiction is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 187948803 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A comparative study of treatment retention in opioid use disorder: Subcutaneous injectable versus sublingual buprenorphine. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Deng%2C+Charles%22">Deng, Charles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Oviedo%2C+Enrique%22">Oviedo, Enrique</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fishman%2C+Marc%22">Fishman, Marc</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burgess‐Hull%2C+Albert%22">Burgess‐Hull, Albert</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Addiction%22">Addiction</searchLink>. Oct2025, Vol. 120 Issue 10, p2127-2133. 7p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Substance+abuse%22">Substance abuse</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sublingual+drug+administration%22">Sublingual drug administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Controlled+release+preparations%22">Controlled release preparations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+observation%22">Scientific observation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Treatment+effectiveness%22">Treatment effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Retrospective+studies%22">Retrospective studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Longitudinal+method%22">Longitudinal method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Kaplan-Meier+estimator%22">Kaplan-Meier estimator</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+studies%22">Comparative studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Narcotic+antagonists%22">Narcotic antagonists</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Buprenorphine%22">Buprenorphine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Subcutaneous+injections%22">Subcutaneous injections</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Proportional+hazards+models%22">Proportional hazards models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation%22">Evaluation</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Maryland%22">Maryland</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background and aims: Buprenorphine treatment for opioid‐use disorder (OUD) is commonly available in both sublingual tablets/films and extended‐release subcutaneous injections; however, little is known about differences in patient retention between these two buprenorphine formulations. This study measured retention differences between patients who transitioned from sublingual to subcutaneous injectable buprenorphine and those who remained on sublingual buprenorphine throughout treatment, within a multi‐location outpatient addiction treatment practice. Design and setting: This study was an observational propensity score‐matched cohort study conducted at a multi‐location outpatient addiction practice in Maryland, USA. Participants: Participants included 3609 patients receiving buprenorphine treatment for OUD between June 2019 and February 2024. Measurements: Patient demographics, health history and urine toxicology results. The primary outcome was time‐to‐dropout in days. Kaplan–Meier and Cox Proportional Hazard models with propensity score matching were used to compare treatment retention between injectable and sublingual buprenorphine receipt. Findings Overall, 538 patients at the time of their first extended‐release buprenorphine injection (INJ) were matched with 538 patients only receiving sublingual buprenorphine (SUB‐only). In the unmatched sample, INJ patients were more likely than SUB‐only patients to be female (INJ 47.2% vs SUB‐only 38.7%, P < 0.001) and more likely to have at least an associate's degree (41.4% vs 33.9%, P < 0.001). After matching, patients who transitioned to INJ buprenorphine had lower retention in treatment compared with patients who remained on SUB buprenorphine. Median (95% confidence interval) time‐to‐dropout was 269 days (218–313) for INJ patients compared with 389 days (313–592) for SUB‐only patients (stratified log‐rank test = 13.6, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Among patients receiving medication treatment for opioid use disorder in an outpatient setting, those who transitioned from sublingual to subcutaneous injectable buprenorphine were at an increased risk for dropout compared with matched patients who only received sublingual buprenorphine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Addiction is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=187948803 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/add.70105 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 StartPage: 2127 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Substance abuse Type: general – SubjectFull: Sublingual drug administration Type: general – SubjectFull: Controlled release preparations Type: general – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: Scientific observation Type: general – SubjectFull: Treatment effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Retrospective studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Longitudinal method Type: general – SubjectFull: Kaplan-Meier estimator Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis software Type: general – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals Type: general – SubjectFull: Narcotic antagonists Type: general – SubjectFull: Buprenorphine Type: general – SubjectFull: Subcutaneous injections Type: general – SubjectFull: Proportional hazards models Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Maryland Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A comparative study of treatment retention in opioid use disorder: Subcutaneous injectable versus sublingual buprenorphine. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Deng, Charles – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Oviedo, Enrique – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fishman, Marc – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burgess‐Hull, Albert IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Text: Oct2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 09652140 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 120 – Type: issue Value: 10 Titles: – TitleFull: Addiction Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |