View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

The Strategy Use Measure (SUM): A new tool to evaluate the use of compensatory behavioural strategies for cognitive, emotional and behavioural impairments after acquired brain injury.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Strategy Use Measure (SUM): A new tool to evaluate the use of compensatory behavioural strategies for cognitive, emotional and behavioural impairments after acquired brain injury.
Authors: Simpson, Grahame K. (AUTHOR), Gillett, Lauren (AUTHOR), Koh, Eng-Siew (AUTHOR), Walker, Alexanda J. (AUTHOR), Hanna, Joe (AUTHOR), Trad, Wafa (AUTHOR), Simpson, Teresa (AUTHOR), Whiting, Diane L. (AUTHOR)
Source: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. Oct2025, Vol. 35 Issue 9, p1805-1827. 23p.
Subjects: Brain injuries, Rehabilitation, Test validity, Behavioral assessment, Learning strategies, Emotion regulation, Psychological adaptation, Statistical reliability
Abstract: The Strategy Use Measure (SUM) was developed as a systematic tool to assess cognitive, behavioural and emotional strategy use by clients and carers after acquired brain injury. Comprehensive content development was undertaken across four clinical service sites via expert clinician consultation and consensus, file review of strategies used in clinical practice, and consumer consultation. Statistical analysis was undertaken to evaluate items and assess reliability, validity and factor structure. Two final versions of the SUM were developed, for use with clients (SUM-ABI; 14 items) and carers (SUM-C; 24 items). Internal consistency for the total scales was sound (SUM-ABI =.90; SUM-C =.96) as was test-retest reliability (SUM-ABI =.87; SUM-C =.90). Meaningful factors were identified for both scales (SUM-ABI: Memory and Planning, Emotion and Mood, Cognitive Load; SUM-C: Executive Support, Emotion/Behaviour Support, Enhancing Task Performance, Motivation Support) with all subscales demonstrating strong internal consistency (≥.80). Construct validity for both scales was explored using validated measures. The SUM versions were evaluated against COSMIN instrument design standards and found overall to be reliable and valid, with promising utility in rehabilitation for clinicians and researchers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 188100371
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Strategy Use Measure (SUM): A new tool to evaluate the use of compensatory behavioural strategies for cognitive, emotional and behavioural impairments after acquired brain injury.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Simpson%2C+Grahame+K%2E%22">Simpson, Grahame K.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gillett%2C+Lauren%22">Gillett, Lauren</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Koh%2C+Eng-Siew%22">Koh, Eng-Siew</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Walker%2C+Alexanda+J%2E%22">Walker, Alexanda J.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hanna%2C+Joe%22">Hanna, Joe</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Trad%2C+Wafa%22">Trad, Wafa</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Simpson%2C+Teresa%22">Simpson, Teresa</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Whiting%2C+Diane+L%2E%22">Whiting, Diane L.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Neuropsychological+Rehabilitation%22">Neuropsychological Rehabilitation</searchLink>. Oct2025, Vol. 35 Issue 9, p1805-1827. 23p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Brain+injuries%22">Brain injuries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rehabilitation%22">Rehabilitation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+validity%22">Test validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavioral+assessment%22">Behavioral assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+strategies%22">Learning strategies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Emotion+regulation%22">Emotion regulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+adaptation%22">Psychological adaptation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+reliability%22">Statistical reliability</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The Strategy Use Measure (SUM) was developed as a systematic tool to assess cognitive, behavioural and emotional strategy use by clients and carers after acquired brain injury. Comprehensive content development was undertaken across four clinical service sites via expert clinician consultation and consensus, file review of strategies used in clinical practice, and consumer consultation. Statistical analysis was undertaken to evaluate items and assess reliability, validity and factor structure. Two final versions of the SUM were developed, for use with clients (SUM-ABI; 14 items) and carers (SUM-C; 24 items). Internal consistency for the total scales was sound (SUM-ABI =.90; SUM-C =.96) as was test-retest reliability (SUM-ABI =.87; SUM-C =.90). Meaningful factors were identified for both scales (SUM-ABI: Memory and Planning, Emotion and Mood, Cognitive Load; SUM-C: Executive Support, Emotion/Behaviour Support, Enhancing Task Performance, Motivation Support) with all subscales demonstrating strong internal consistency (≥.80). Construct validity for both scales was explored using validated measures. The SUM versions were evaluated against COSMIN instrument design standards and found overall to be reliable and valid, with promising utility in rehabilitation for clinicians and researchers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=188100371
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/09602011.2025.2462040
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 23
        StartPage: 1805
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Brain injuries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Rehabilitation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test validity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Behavioral assessment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning strategies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Emotion regulation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychological adaptation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical reliability
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Strategy Use Measure (SUM): A new tool to evaluate the use of compensatory behavioural strategies for cognitive, emotional and behavioural impairments after acquired brain injury.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Simpson, Grahame K.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gillett, Lauren
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Koh, Eng-Siew
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Walker, Alexanda J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hanna, Joe
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Trad, Wafa
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Simpson, Teresa
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Whiting, Diane L.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Text: Oct2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09602011
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 35
            – Type: issue
              Value: 9
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
              Type: main
ResultId 1