View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Tune in to the prebunking network! Development and validation of six inoculation videos that prebunk manipulation tactics and logical fallacies in misinformation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Tune in to the prebunking network! Development and validation of six inoculation videos that prebunk manipulation tactics and logical fallacies in misinformation.
Authors: Biddlestone, Mikey (AUTHOR), Roozenbeek, Jon (AUTHOR), Suiter, Jane (AUTHOR), Culloty, Eileen (AUTHOR), van der Linden, Sander (AUTHOR)
Source: Political Psychology. Dec2025, Vol. 46 Issue 6, p1858-1886. 29p.
Subjects: Misinformation, Logical fallacies, Conspiracy theories, Cognitive bias, Predicate (Logic), Polarization (Social sciences)
Abstract: Meta‐analyses have demonstrated how inoculation interventions increase the detection of misinformation, but their scalability has remained elusive. To address this, Study 1 (pre‐registered; N = 1,583) tested the efficacy of three short inoculation videos (prebunks) against three common manipulation tactics used in misinformation: (1) polarization, (2) conspiracy theories, and (3) fake experts. Results indicated that all three inoculation videos (vs. control) increased the detection of relevant manipulative content without altering perceptions of non‐manipulative content, but only the polarization inoculation video increased manipulation discernment (i.e., increased ability to distinguish between manipulative and non‐manipulative content). In Study 2 (pre‐registered; N = 1,603), we tested the efficacy of three more inoculation videos containing logic‐based prebunks against logical fallacies commonly used in misinformation: (1) whataboutism, (2) the moving the goalposts fallacy, and (3) the strawman fallacy. Detection of the relevant fallacious content was higher in all conditions (vs. control), but only the strawman fallacy inoculation video increased fallacy discernment. The moving the goalposts fallacy inoculation video appeared to increase overall distrust of relevant content, whereas the other two videos did not alter perceptions of relevant non‐fallacious content. We discuss the implications and limitations of these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Political Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 189766422
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Tune in to the prebunking network! Development and validation of six inoculation videos that prebunk manipulation tactics and logical fallacies in misinformation.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Biddlestone%2C+Mikey%22">Biddlestone, Mikey</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Roozenbeek%2C+Jon%22">Roozenbeek, Jon</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Suiter%2C+Jane%22">Suiter, Jane</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Culloty%2C+Eileen%22">Culloty, Eileen</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+der+Linden%2C+Sander%22">van der Linden, Sander</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Political+Psychology%22">Political Psychology</searchLink>. Dec2025, Vol. 46 Issue 6, p1858-1886. 29p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Misinformation%22">Misinformation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Logical+fallacies%22">Logical fallacies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conspiracy+theories%22">Conspiracy theories</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+bias%22">Cognitive bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Predicate+%28Logic%29%22">Predicate (Logic)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Polarization+%28Social+sciences%29%22">Polarization (Social sciences)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Meta‐analyses have demonstrated how inoculation interventions increase the detection of misinformation, but their scalability has remained elusive. To address this, Study 1 (pre‐registered; N = 1,583) tested the efficacy of three short inoculation videos (prebunks) against three common manipulation tactics used in misinformation: (1) polarization, (2) conspiracy theories, and (3) fake experts. Results indicated that all three inoculation videos (vs. control) increased the detection of relevant manipulative content without altering perceptions of non‐manipulative content, but only the polarization inoculation video increased manipulation discernment (i.e., increased ability to distinguish between manipulative and non‐manipulative content). In Study 2 (pre‐registered; N = 1,603), we tested the efficacy of three more inoculation videos containing logic‐based prebunks against logical fallacies commonly used in misinformation: (1) whataboutism, (2) the moving the goalposts fallacy, and (3) the strawman fallacy. Detection of the relevant fallacious content was higher in all conditions (vs. control), but only the strawman fallacy inoculation video increased fallacy discernment. The moving the goalposts fallacy inoculation video appeared to increase overall distrust of relevant content, whereas the other two videos did not alter perceptions of relevant non‐fallacious content. We discuss the implications and limitations of these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Political Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=189766422
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/pops.70015
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 29
        StartPage: 1858
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Misinformation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Logical fallacies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Conspiracy theories
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive bias
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Predicate (Logic)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Polarization (Social sciences)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Tune in to the prebunking network! Development and validation of six inoculation videos that prebunk manipulation tactics and logical fallacies in misinformation.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Biddlestone, Mikey
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Roozenbeek, Jon
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Suiter, Jane
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Culloty, Eileen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van der Linden, Sander
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0162895X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 46
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Political Psychology
              Type: main
ResultId 1