Engagement strategies in an assertive outreach context: a mixed-methods systematic review.
Saved in:
| Title: | Engagement strategies in an assertive outreach context: a mixed-methods systematic review. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Berghmans, Ellen (AUTHOR), Vliegen, Nicole (AUTHOR), Destoop, Marianne (AUTHOR), Luyten, Patrick (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Mental Health. Dec2025, Vol. 34 Issue 6, p682-694. 13p. |
| Subjects: | AMED (Information retrieval system), Medical information storage & retrieval systems, Patient autonomy, Community health services, Holistic medicine, Health services accessibility, Teams in the workplace, Respect, Interprofessional relations, Research funding, At-risk people, Caring, Continuum of care, Systematic reviews, MEDLINE, Patient-centered care, Thematic analysis, People with mental illness, Patient-professional relations, Convalescence, Social support, Patient participation, Integrated health care delivery, Psychology information storage & retrieval systems |
| Abstract: | Background: Assertive outreach (AO) is a systematic approach to engage vulnerable patients with serious mental illness. Aims: This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of engagement strategies in relation to principles of the AO model to clarify effective components of AO, better understand engagement in an AO context, and consider encompassing change mechanisms. Methods: A systematic mixed-methods review was completed from 1806 to December 2022 (no pre-registration). Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were rated for methodological quality using the JBI scales and thematic synthesis using a meta-aggregative approach. Reporting was according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Results: Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The literature was defined by three main themes: definition and perspectives of engagement; key principles of AO in relation to engagement; and additional principles and strategies enhancing engagement. Conclusion: Despite the heterogeneity in defining engagement, the relationship between AO professionals and patients emerged as crucial in the process of engagement. Subsequently, the four key principles of AO emerged as central to promoting engagement. Finally, we identified a number of additional principles that are considered crucial in the engagement process in AO. The review concludes with recommendations for future research and the implementation of AO in routine clinical care. PRISMA/PROSPERO: The reporting of this review is conducted following the PRISMA guidance and not registered at PROSPERO because completed reviews cannot be registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Mental Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 190283415 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Engagement strategies in an assertive outreach context: a mixed-methods systematic review. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Berghmans%2C+Ellen%22">Berghmans, Ellen</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vliegen%2C+Nicole%22">Vliegen, Nicole</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Destoop%2C+Marianne%22">Destoop, Marianne</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Luyten%2C+Patrick%22">Luyten, Patrick</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Mental+Health%22">Journal of Mental Health</searchLink>. Dec2025, Vol. 34 Issue 6, p682-694. 13p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22AMED+%28Information+retrieval+system%29%22">AMED (Information retrieval system)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Medical information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patient+autonomy%22">Patient autonomy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Community+health+services%22">Community health services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Holistic+medicine%22">Holistic medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+services+accessibility%22">Health services accessibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teams+in+the+workplace%22">Teams in the workplace</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Respect%22">Respect</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interprofessional+relations%22">Interprofessional relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22At-risk+people%22">At-risk people</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Caring%22">Caring</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Continuum+of+care%22">Continuum of care</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDLINE%22">MEDLINE</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patient-centered+care%22">Patient-centered care</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22People+with+mental+illness%22">People with mental illness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patient-professional+relations%22">Patient-professional relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Convalescence%22">Convalescence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+support%22">Social support</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patient+participation%22">Patient participation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Integrated+health+care+delivery%22">Integrated health care delivery</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Psychology information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Assertive outreach (AO) is a systematic approach to engage vulnerable patients with serious mental illness. Aims: This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of engagement strategies in relation to principles of the AO model to clarify effective components of AO, better understand engagement in an AO context, and consider encompassing change mechanisms. Methods: A systematic mixed-methods review was completed from 1806 to December 2022 (no pre-registration). Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were rated for methodological quality using the JBI scales and thematic synthesis using a meta-aggregative approach. Reporting was according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Results: Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The literature was defined by three main themes: definition and perspectives of engagement; key principles of AO in relation to engagement; and additional principles and strategies enhancing engagement. Conclusion: Despite the heterogeneity in defining engagement, the relationship between AO professionals and patients emerged as crucial in the process of engagement. Subsequently, the four key principles of AO emerged as central to promoting engagement. Finally, we identified a number of additional principles that are considered crucial in the engagement process in AO. The review concludes with recommendations for future research and the implementation of AO in routine clinical care. PRISMA/PROSPERO: The reporting of this review is conducted following the PRISMA guidance and not registered at PROSPERO because completed reviews cannot be registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Mental Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=190283415 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/09638237.2024.2390363 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 682 Subjects: – SubjectFull: AMED (Information retrieval system) Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical information storage & retrieval systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Patient autonomy Type: general – SubjectFull: Community health services Type: general – SubjectFull: Holistic medicine Type: general – SubjectFull: Health services accessibility Type: general – SubjectFull: Teams in the workplace Type: general – SubjectFull: Respect Type: general – SubjectFull: Interprofessional relations Type: general – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: At-risk people Type: general – SubjectFull: Caring Type: general – SubjectFull: Continuum of care Type: general – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews Type: general – SubjectFull: MEDLINE Type: general – SubjectFull: Patient-centered care Type: general – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: People with mental illness Type: general – SubjectFull: Patient-professional relations Type: general – SubjectFull: Convalescence Type: general – SubjectFull: Social support Type: general – SubjectFull: Patient participation Type: general – SubjectFull: Integrated health care delivery Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychology information storage & retrieval systems Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Engagement strategies in an assertive outreach context: a mixed-methods systematic review. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Berghmans, Ellen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Vliegen, Nicole – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Destoop, Marianne – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Luyten, Patrick IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Text: Dec2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 09638237 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 34 – Type: issue Value: 6 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Mental Health Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |