Interprofessional tensions on designing an arts-based theatre intervention in a rehabilitation setting.
Saved in:
| Title: | Interprofessional tensions on designing an arts-based theatre intervention in a rehabilitation setting. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Finlay, Sébastien (AUTHOR), D'Anjou, Camille (AUTHOR), Rezzonico, Stefano (AUTHOR), Gendron-Langevin, Maud (AUTHOR), Le Dorze, Guylaine (AUTHOR), Verduyckt, Ingrid (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Interprofessional Care. Jan/Feb2026, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p184-187. 4p. |
| Subjects: | Consensus (Social sciences), Interprofessional relations, Research funding, Qualitative research, Focus groups, Diffusion of innovations, Stuttering, Performing arts, Rehabilitation centers, Professions, Psychological stress, Research, Art therapy, Labor discipline, Professional competence, Cooperativeness, Children |
| Geographic Terms: | Canada |
| Abstract: | This study examines the tensions encountered by an interprofessional team collaborating to design an arts-based theater intervention in a rehabilitation setting. A qualitative focus group with 13 participants, including clinicians, patient participants, researchers, and theater professionals, identified five key tensions: defining the intervention (physicality vs. intellectualization), roles of clinicians (defined vs. transversal), objectives of the intervention (therapeutic vs. theatrical), modality of the intervention (individual vs. group), and target population (specific vs. general). These findings underscore the challenge of balancing disciplinary expertise with innovation in collaborative settings. Reflective practices can help navigate these tensions, fostering integration of creative and clinical approaches. Future research should examine how such dynamics shape collaboration across diverse contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Interprofessional Care is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | This study examines the tensions encountered by an interprofessional team collaborating to design an arts-based theater intervention in a rehabilitation setting. A qualitative focus group with 13 participants, including clinicians, patient participants, researchers, and theater professionals, identified five key tensions: defining the intervention (physicality vs. intellectualization), roles of clinicians (defined vs. transversal), objectives of the intervention (therapeutic vs. theatrical), modality of the intervention (individual vs. group), and target population (specific vs. general). These findings underscore the challenge of balancing disciplinary expertise with innovation in collaborative settings. Reflective practices can help navigate these tensions, fostering integration of creative and clinical approaches. Future research should examine how such dynamics shape collaboration across diverse contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 13561820 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/13561820.2025.2562066 |
