View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

The classification accuracy of Warrington's recognition memory test (words) as a performance validity Test in a neurorehabilitation setting.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The classification accuracy of Warrington's recognition memory test (words) as a performance validity Test in a neurorehabilitation setting.
Authors: Parsons, Jenna (AUTHOR), Rodrigues, Nelson B. (AUTHOR), Erdodi, Laszlo A. (AUTHOR)
Source: Applied Neuropsychology: Adult. Jan/Feb2026, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p155-165. 11p.
Subjects: Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics), Neurorehabilitation, Test validity, Psychological tests, Classification, Statistical accuracy
Abstract: This study was designed to evaluate the classification accuracy of the Warrington's Recognition Memory Test (RMT) in 167 patients (97 or 58.1% men; MAge = 40.4; MEducation= 13.8) medically referred for neuropsychological evaluation against five psychometrically defined criterion groups. At the optimal cutoff (≤42), the RMT produced an acceptable combination of sensitivity (.36-.60) and specificity (.85-.95), correctly classifying 68.4-83.3% of the sample. Making the cutoff more conservative (≤41) improved specificity (.88-.95) at the expense of sensitivity (.30-.60). Lowering the cutoff to ≤40 achieved uniformly high specificity (.91-.95) but diminished sensitivity (.27-.48). RMT scores were unrelated to lateral dominance, education, or gender. The RMT was sensitive to a three-way classification of performance validity (Pass/Borderline/Fail), further demonstrating its discriminant power. Despite a notable decline in research studies focused on its classification accuracy within the last decade, the RMT remains an effective free-standing PVT that is robust to demographic variables. Relatively low sensitivity is its main liability. Further research is needed on its cross-cultural validity (sensitivity to limited English proficiency). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Applied Neuropsychology: Adult is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 190954938
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The classification accuracy of Warrington's recognition memory test (words) as a performance validity Test in a neurorehabilitation setting.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Parsons%2C+Jenna%22">Parsons, Jenna</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rodrigues%2C+Nelson+B%2E%22">Rodrigues, Nelson B.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Erdodi%2C+Laszlo+A%2E%22">Erdodi, Laszlo A.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Applied+Neuropsychology%3A+Adult%22">Applied Neuropsychology: Adult</searchLink>. Jan/Feb2026, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p155-165. 11p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sensitivity+%26+specificity+%28Statistics%29%22">Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Neurorehabilitation%22">Neurorehabilitation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+validity%22">Test validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+tests%22">Psychological tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classification%22">Classification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+accuracy%22">Statistical accuracy</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This study was designed to evaluate the classification accuracy of the Warrington's Recognition Memory Test (RMT) in 167 patients (97 or 58.1% men; MAge = 40.4; MEducation= 13.8) medically referred for neuropsychological evaluation against five psychometrically defined criterion groups. At the optimal cutoff (≤42), the RMT produced an acceptable combination of sensitivity (.36-.60) and specificity (.85-.95), correctly classifying 68.4-83.3% of the sample. Making the cutoff more conservative (≤41) improved specificity (.88-.95) at the expense of sensitivity (.30-.60). Lowering the cutoff to ≤40 achieved uniformly high specificity (.91-.95) but diminished sensitivity (.27-.48). RMT scores were unrelated to lateral dominance, education, or gender. The RMT was sensitive to a three-way classification of performance validity (Pass/Borderline/Fail), further demonstrating its discriminant power. Despite a notable decline in research studies focused on its classification accuracy within the last decade, the RMT remains an effective free-standing PVT that is robust to demographic variables. Relatively low sensitivity is its main liability. Further research is needed on its cross-cultural validity (sensitivity to limited English proficiency). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Applied Neuropsychology: Adult is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=190954938
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2337130
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 155
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Neurorehabilitation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test validity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychological tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Classification
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical accuracy
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The classification accuracy of Warrington's recognition memory test (words) as a performance validity Test in a neurorehabilitation setting.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Parsons, Jenna
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rodrigues, Nelson B.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Erdodi, Laszlo A.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan/Feb2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 23279095
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 33
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Applied Neuropsychology: Adult
              Type: main
ResultId 1