Comparing performance and experience in a conventional and accessible gym: a mixed methods study.
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparing performance and experience in a conventional and accessible gym: a mixed methods study. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Mitchell, Fallon R. (AUTHOR), Horton, Sean (AUTHOR), Scharoun Benson, Sara (AUTHOR), Mogyorody, Veronika (AUTHOR), van Wyk, Paula M. (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Disability & Rehabilitation. Feb2026, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p756-778. 23p. |
| Subjects: | Accessible design, Exercise, Research funding, Physical fitness centers, Universal design, Questionnaires, Content analysis, Sound recordings, Thematic analysis, Social integration, Research methodology, Trust, Body movement, Comparative studies, Health equity, People with disabilities, Video recording, Cognition |
| Geographic Terms: | Canada |
| Abstract: | Purpose: Exercise offers benefits for people with a disability, yet environmental barriers hinder their participation in gyms. Universal design (UD) may enhance gym accessibility by addressing diverse users' needs, but greater empirical evidence is needed. This mixed methods study compared diverse participants' experiences of barriers and facilitators in a conventional gym and a gym adapted with UD. Methods: Participants were instructed to think aloud as they completed five tasks in each gym while being audio and video recorded. Video observations were used to assign data points to floor plans of each gym, documenting where and how often barriers and facilitators occurred. Directed content analysis of transcripts captured participants' perceptions of each gym. Joint display tables integrated behavioural mapping and think aloud data. Results: Thirty-nine participants with and without a disability participated. The adapted gym yielded fewer barriers and more facilitators than the conventional gym. Seven themes encompassed participants' perceptions of each gym environment. Data integration identified key physical, social, cognitive, sensory, and environmental factors that affect accessibility and inclusion in gyms. Conclusions: UD can improve gym accessibility, while fostering inclusive environments that support exercise for people with diverse abilities. Gyms implementing UD may reduce health inequities by accommodating diverse users. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Gym-based exercise can offer significant benefits for the health and well-being of people with a disability Equitable opportunities for gym-based exercise are hindered by inaccessible physical, sensory, cognitive, and social environments Gyms developed using universal design principles may afford users with and without a disability accessible exercise opportunities that are enjoyable and inclusive [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Disability & Rehabilitation is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
Be the first to leave a comment!
