Enter the matrix: Examining the psychosocial determinants of support for a technocracy of artificial intelligence.
Saved in:
| Title: | Enter the matrix: Examining the psychosocial determinants of support for a technocracy of artificial intelligence. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Dono, Marcos (AUTHOR), Moreno Bella, Eva (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Political Psychology. Feb2026, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p1-27. 27p. |
| Subjects: | Artificial intelligence, Anomy, Psychosocial factors, Ideology, Socioeconomic factors, Decision making in political science, Technocracy |
| Abstract: | Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands as the most transformative technology since the Industrial Revolution. As AI is integrated into different domains of life, it is likely to also permeate politics. In fact, some voices already advocate for AI to make political decisions. This paper emphasizes the necessity to delve into the psychosocial determinants shaping support for supporting a technocracy of AI (TecAI). The research aims to ascertain whether anomie, moderated by NCC and SDO, predicts support for TecAI across three studies involving Spanish participants (Ntotal = 754). The findings confirm anomie's predictive power on support of TecAI, albeit without establishing causality consistently, as anomie's condition failed to alter support for TecAI in experiments 2 and 3. However, an exploratory analysis showed a small effect of the subdimension of "breakdown of leadership" on support for TecAI in a directional test, informing future research. Moreover, NCC and SDO did not significantly moderate the anomie‐support‐for‐TecAI link. Ideology also emerged as a consistent predictor, with conservatives consistently showing more support, a finding that ought to be re‐examined and clarified. This study marks an initial empirical exploration into AI's political perceptions, hinting at the need for further investigation into this critical domain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Political Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 191185487 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Enter the matrix: Examining the psychosocial determinants of support for a technocracy of artificial intelligence. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dono%2C+Marcos%22">Dono, Marcos</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Moreno+Bella%2C+Eva%22">Moreno Bella, Eva</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Political+Psychology%22">Political Psychology</searchLink>. Feb2026, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p1-27. 27p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+intelligence%22">Artificial intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Anomy%22">Anomy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychosocial+factors%22">Psychosocial factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ideology%22">Ideology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Socioeconomic+factors%22">Socioeconomic factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making+in+political+science%22">Decision making in political science</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technocracy%22">Technocracy</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands as the most transformative technology since the Industrial Revolution. As AI is integrated into different domains of life, it is likely to also permeate politics. In fact, some voices already advocate for AI to make political decisions. This paper emphasizes the necessity to delve into the psychosocial determinants shaping support for supporting a technocracy of AI (TecAI). The research aims to ascertain whether anomie, moderated by NCC and SDO, predicts support for TecAI across three studies involving Spanish participants (Ntotal = 754). The findings confirm anomie's predictive power on support of TecAI, albeit without establishing causality consistently, as anomie's condition failed to alter support for TecAI in experiments 2 and 3. However, an exploratory analysis showed a small effect of the subdimension of "breakdown of leadership" on support for TecAI in a directional test, informing future research. Moreover, NCC and SDO did not significantly moderate the anomie‐support‐for‐TecAI link. Ideology also emerged as a consistent predictor, with conservatives consistently showing more support, a finding that ought to be re‐examined and clarified. This study marks an initial empirical exploration into AI's political perceptions, hinting at the need for further investigation into this critical domain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Political Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=191185487 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/pops.13048 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 27 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Artificial intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Anomy Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychosocial factors Type: general – SubjectFull: Ideology Type: general – SubjectFull: Socioeconomic factors Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision making in political science Type: general – SubjectFull: Technocracy Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Enter the matrix: Examining the psychosocial determinants of support for a technocracy of artificial intelligence. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dono, Marcos – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Moreno Bella, Eva IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Text: Feb2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0162895X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 47 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Political Psychology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |