Theology and (or/from/above) Science.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Theology and (or/from/above) Science.
Authors: Ryliškytė, Ligita (AUTHOR)
Source: Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science. Dec2025, Vol. 60 Issue 4, p997-1021. 25p.
Subjects: Theology, Lonergan, Bernard J. F., 1904-1984, Interdisciplinary communication, Theory of knowledge, Philosophy of science, Philosophers
Abstract: This article examines the evolving relationship between theology and science, critically evaluating three untenable approaches: theology or science (separation), theology from science (subordination of theology), and theology above science (subordination of science). Engaging with the works of Michael Buckley, Ian Barbour, Paul Tyson, and others, it highlights the risks of subsumption in both directions. Drawing on Bernard J. F. Lonergan's philosophy of self-appropriation, the article argues that genuine engagement requires a unity-in-distinction—preserving the relative autonomy of each discipline while fostering responsible dialogue. By emphasizing a shared search for understanding, Lonergan's generalized empirical method is presented as a philosophical framework for cross-disciplinary collaboration that resists both conflict and reductionism. This approach offers a philosophical foundation for interdisciplinary engagement, preventing epistemic compartmentalization while affirming the integrity of both fields. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science is the property of Open Library of Humanities and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 191458059
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Theology and (or/from/above) Science.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ryliškytė%2C+Ligita%22">Ryliškytė, Ligita</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Zygon%3A+Journal+of+Religion+%26+Science%22">Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science</searchLink>. Dec2025, Vol. 60 Issue 4, p997-1021. 25p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Theology%22">Theology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lonergan%2C+Bernard+J%2E+F%2E%2C+1904-1984%22">Lonergan, Bernard J. F., 1904-1984</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interdisciplinary+communication%22">Interdisciplinary communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Theory+of+knowledge%22">Theory of knowledge</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Philosophy+of+science%22">Philosophy of science</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Philosophers%22">Philosophers</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This article examines the evolving relationship between theology and science, critically evaluating three untenable approaches: theology or science (separation), theology from science (subordination of theology), and theology above science (subordination of science). Engaging with the works of Michael Buckley, Ian Barbour, Paul Tyson, and others, it highlights the risks of subsumption in both directions. Drawing on Bernard J. F. Lonergan's philosophy of self-appropriation, the article argues that genuine engagement requires a unity-in-distinction—preserving the relative autonomy of each discipline while fostering responsible dialogue. By emphasizing a shared search for understanding, Lonergan's generalized empirical method is presented as a philosophical framework for cross-disciplinary collaboration that resists both conflict and reductionism. This approach offers a philosophical foundation for interdisciplinary engagement, preventing epistemic compartmentalization while affirming the integrity of both fields. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science is the property of Open Library of Humanities and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=191458059
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.16995/zygon.22979
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 25
        StartPage: 997
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Theology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Lonergan, Bernard J. F., 1904-1984
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interdisciplinary communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Theory of knowledge
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Philosophy of science
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Philosophers
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Theology and (or/from/above) Science.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ryliškytė, Ligita
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 05912385
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 60
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science
              Type: main
ResultId 1