Using recovery-focused PROMs in mental health care: what helps and what gets in the way? A scoping review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Using recovery-focused PROMs in mental health care: what helps and what gets in the way? A scoping review.
Authors: Zappa, Asha (AUTHOR), Scanlan, Justin Newton (AUTHOR), Honey, Anne (AUTHOR), Hancock, Nicola (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Mental Health. Feb2026, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p127-139. 13p.
Subjects: Corporate culture, Health services accessibility, Work, Clinical medicine, Medical information storage & retrieval systems, Health literacy, Mental health services, Professional practice, Professional ethics, CINAHL database, Questionnaires, Research evaluation, Culture, Descriptive statistics, Confidence, Goal (Psychology), Systematic reviews, Thematic analysis, Organizational structure, MEDLINE, Information needs, Attitude (Psychology), Convalescence, Attitudes of medical personnel, Psychometrics, Cognition disorders, Health outcome assessment, Mental health personnel, Change, Data analysis software, Psychosocial factors, Access to information, Experiential learning, Psychology information storage & retrieval systems, Time, Employees' workload, Medical practice, Patients' attitudes
Abstract: Background: Recovery-focused person/patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), are important for recovery-oriented services, but workers have been slow to embed them within practice. Little is known about factors that influence workers use of these measures. Aim: To synthesise peer reviewed literature regarding the enablers and barriers mental health workers report to using recovery-focused PROMs in practice. Methods: Five databases were searched. Data were extracted from publications meeting the inclusion criteria, tabulated, and presented graphically. A qualitative thematic analysis was also conducted. Results: Only six of 30 recovery-focused PROMs had any published work reporting staff experiences of using them. Aspects influencing PROM use included: organisational and structural factors; value alignment; tool psychometrics; perceived relevance to practice and people accessing service; whether staff deemed tools to be useful and meaningful, and ease of use and access. Conclusions: More work is needed to address worker needs if recovery-focused tools are to be used routinely to collaboratively support people to explore their own recovery-related strengths and priorities. Both tool specific aspects, and organisational structures, that can support or hinder workers to use these tools in routine and recovery-oriented ways. PRISMA/PROSPERO: The PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was followed. Prospero does not accept protocols for scoping reviews. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Mental Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 191459207
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Using recovery-focused PROMs in mental health care: what helps and what gets in the way? A scoping review.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zappa%2C+Asha%22">Zappa, Asha</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Scanlan%2C+Justin+Newton%22">Scanlan, Justin Newton</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Honey%2C+Anne%22">Honey, Anne</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hancock%2C+Nicola%22">Hancock, Nicola</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Mental+Health%22">Journal of Mental Health</searchLink>. Feb2026, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p127-139. 13p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Corporate+culture%22">Corporate culture</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+services+accessibility%22">Health services accessibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Work%22">Work</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+medicine%22">Clinical medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Medical information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+literacy%22">Health literacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+health+services%22">Mental health services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+practice%22">Professional practice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+ethics%22">Professional ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22CINAHL+database%22">CINAHL database</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+evaluation%22">Research evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Culture%22">Culture</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence%22">Confidence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Goal+%28Psychology%29%22">Goal (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organizational+structure%22">Organizational structure</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDLINE%22">MEDLINE</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+needs%22">Information needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitude+%28Psychology%29%22">Attitude (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Convalescence%22">Convalescence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitudes+of+medical+personnel%22">Attitudes of medical personnel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychometrics%22">Psychometrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognition+disorders%22">Cognition disorders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+outcome+assessment%22">Health outcome assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+health+personnel%22">Mental health personnel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Change%22">Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychosocial+factors%22">Psychosocial factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Access+to+information%22">Access to information</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experiential+learning%22">Experiential learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Psychology information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Time%22">Time</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employees'+workload%22">Employees' workload</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+practice%22">Medical practice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patients'+attitudes%22">Patients' attitudes</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Recovery-focused person/patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), are important for recovery-oriented services, but workers have been slow to embed them within practice. Little is known about factors that influence workers use of these measures. Aim: To synthesise peer reviewed literature regarding the enablers and barriers mental health workers report to using recovery-focused PROMs in practice. Methods: Five databases were searched. Data were extracted from publications meeting the inclusion criteria, tabulated, and presented graphically. A qualitative thematic analysis was also conducted. Results: Only six of 30 recovery-focused PROMs had any published work reporting staff experiences of using them. Aspects influencing PROM use included: organisational and structural factors; value alignment; tool psychometrics; perceived relevance to practice and people accessing service; whether staff deemed tools to be useful and meaningful, and ease of use and access. Conclusions: More work is needed to address worker needs if recovery-focused tools are to be used routinely to collaboratively support people to explore their own recovery-related strengths and priorities. Both tool specific aspects, and organisational structures, that can support or hinder workers to use these tools in routine and recovery-oriented ways. PRISMA/PROSPERO: The PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was followed. Prospero does not accept protocols for scoping reviews. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Mental Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=191459207
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/09638237.2025.2607985
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 13
        StartPage: 127
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Corporate culture
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health services accessibility
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Work
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Clinical medicine
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical information storage & retrieval systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health literacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mental health services
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Professional practice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Professional ethics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: CINAHL database
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Questionnaires
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Culture
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Confidence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Goal (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Organizational structure
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: MEDLINE
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Information needs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Attitude (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Convalescence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Attitudes of medical personnel
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychometrics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognition disorders
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health outcome assessment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mental health personnel
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Change
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychosocial factors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Access to information
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Experiential learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychology information storage & retrieval systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Time
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Employees' workload
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical practice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Patients' attitudes
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Using recovery-focused PROMs in mental health care: what helps and what gets in the way? A scoping review.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zappa, Asha
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Scanlan, Justin Newton
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Honey, Anne
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hancock, Nicola
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Text: Feb2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09638237
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 35
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Mental Health
              Type: main
ResultId 1