Using recovery-focused PROMs in mental health care: what helps and what gets in the way? A scoping review.
Saved in:
| Title: | Using recovery-focused PROMs in mental health care: what helps and what gets in the way? A scoping review. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Zappa, Asha (AUTHOR), Scanlan, Justin Newton (AUTHOR), Honey, Anne (AUTHOR), Hancock, Nicola (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Mental Health. Feb2026, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p127-139. 13p. |
| Subjects: | Corporate culture, Health services accessibility, Work, Clinical medicine, Medical information storage & retrieval systems, Health literacy, Mental health services, Professional practice, Professional ethics, CINAHL database, Questionnaires, Research evaluation, Culture, Descriptive statistics, Confidence, Goal (Psychology), Systematic reviews, Thematic analysis, Organizational structure, MEDLINE, Information needs, Attitude (Psychology), Convalescence, Attitudes of medical personnel, Psychometrics, Cognition disorders, Health outcome assessment, Mental health personnel, Change, Data analysis software, Psychosocial factors, Access to information, Experiential learning, Psychology information storage & retrieval systems, Time, Employees' workload, Medical practice, Patients' attitudes |
| Abstract: | Background: Recovery-focused person/patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), are important for recovery-oriented services, but workers have been slow to embed them within practice. Little is known about factors that influence workers use of these measures. Aim: To synthesise peer reviewed literature regarding the enablers and barriers mental health workers report to using recovery-focused PROMs in practice. Methods: Five databases were searched. Data were extracted from publications meeting the inclusion criteria, tabulated, and presented graphically. A qualitative thematic analysis was also conducted. Results: Only six of 30 recovery-focused PROMs had any published work reporting staff experiences of using them. Aspects influencing PROM use included: organisational and structural factors; value alignment; tool psychometrics; perceived relevance to practice and people accessing service; whether staff deemed tools to be useful and meaningful, and ease of use and access. Conclusions: More work is needed to address worker needs if recovery-focused tools are to be used routinely to collaboratively support people to explore their own recovery-related strengths and priorities. Both tool specific aspects, and organisational structures, that can support or hinder workers to use these tools in routine and recovery-oriented ways. PRISMA/PROSPERO: The PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was followed. Prospero does not accept protocols for scoping reviews. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Mental Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 191459207 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Using recovery-focused PROMs in mental health care: what helps and what gets in the way? A scoping review. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zappa%2C+Asha%22">Zappa, Asha</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Scanlan%2C+Justin+Newton%22">Scanlan, Justin Newton</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Honey%2C+Anne%22">Honey, Anne</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hancock%2C+Nicola%22">Hancock, Nicola</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Mental+Health%22">Journal of Mental Health</searchLink>. Feb2026, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p127-139. 13p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Corporate+culture%22">Corporate culture</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+services+accessibility%22">Health services accessibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Work%22">Work</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+medicine%22">Clinical medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Medical information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+literacy%22">Health literacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+health+services%22">Mental health services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+practice%22">Professional practice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+ethics%22">Professional ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22CINAHL+database%22">CINAHL database</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+evaluation%22">Research evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Culture%22">Culture</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence%22">Confidence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Goal+%28Psychology%29%22">Goal (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organizational+structure%22">Organizational structure</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDLINE%22">MEDLINE</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+needs%22">Information needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitude+%28Psychology%29%22">Attitude (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Convalescence%22">Convalescence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitudes+of+medical+personnel%22">Attitudes of medical personnel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychometrics%22">Psychometrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognition+disorders%22">Cognition disorders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+outcome+assessment%22">Health outcome assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+health+personnel%22">Mental health personnel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Change%22">Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychosocial+factors%22">Psychosocial factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Access+to+information%22">Access to information</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experiential+learning%22">Experiential learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Psychology information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Time%22">Time</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employees'+workload%22">Employees' workload</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+practice%22">Medical practice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patients'+attitudes%22">Patients' attitudes</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Recovery-focused person/patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), are important for recovery-oriented services, but workers have been slow to embed them within practice. Little is known about factors that influence workers use of these measures. Aim: To synthesise peer reviewed literature regarding the enablers and barriers mental health workers report to using recovery-focused PROMs in practice. Methods: Five databases were searched. Data were extracted from publications meeting the inclusion criteria, tabulated, and presented graphically. A qualitative thematic analysis was also conducted. Results: Only six of 30 recovery-focused PROMs had any published work reporting staff experiences of using them. Aspects influencing PROM use included: organisational and structural factors; value alignment; tool psychometrics; perceived relevance to practice and people accessing service; whether staff deemed tools to be useful and meaningful, and ease of use and access. Conclusions: More work is needed to address worker needs if recovery-focused tools are to be used routinely to collaboratively support people to explore their own recovery-related strengths and priorities. Both tool specific aspects, and organisational structures, that can support or hinder workers to use these tools in routine and recovery-oriented ways. PRISMA/PROSPERO: The PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was followed. Prospero does not accept protocols for scoping reviews. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Mental Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=191459207 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/09638237.2025.2607985 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 127 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Corporate culture Type: general – SubjectFull: Health services accessibility Type: general – SubjectFull: Work Type: general – SubjectFull: Clinical medicine Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical information storage & retrieval systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Health literacy Type: general – SubjectFull: Mental health services Type: general – SubjectFull: Professional practice Type: general – SubjectFull: Professional ethics Type: general – SubjectFull: CINAHL database Type: general – SubjectFull: Questionnaires Type: general – SubjectFull: Research evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Culture Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Confidence Type: general – SubjectFull: Goal (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews Type: general – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Organizational structure Type: general – SubjectFull: MEDLINE Type: general – SubjectFull: Information needs Type: general – SubjectFull: Attitude (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Convalescence Type: general – SubjectFull: Attitudes of medical personnel Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychometrics Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognition disorders Type: general – SubjectFull: Health outcome assessment Type: general – SubjectFull: Mental health personnel Type: general – SubjectFull: Change Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis software Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychosocial factors Type: general – SubjectFull: Access to information Type: general – SubjectFull: Experiential learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychology information storage & retrieval systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Time Type: general – SubjectFull: Employees' workload Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical practice Type: general – SubjectFull: Patients' attitudes Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Using recovery-focused PROMs in mental health care: what helps and what gets in the way? A scoping review. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zappa, Asha – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Scanlan, Justin Newton – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Honey, Anne – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hancock, Nicola IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Text: Feb2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 09638237 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 35 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Mental Health Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |