Psychology needs a... research evaluation revolution.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Psychology needs a... research evaluation revolution.
Authors: Stokoe, Elizabeth (AUTHOR), Inglis, Matthew (AUTHOR), Foster, Colin (AUTHOR), Lortie-Forgues, Hugo (AUTHOR), Simms, Victoria (AUTHOR)
Source: Psychologist. Mar2026, p32-35. 4p. 1 Cartoon or Caricature.
Subjects: Research evaluation, Qualitative research, Text mining, Research funding, Behavioral sciences
Geographic Terms: United Kingdom
Abstract: The article examines the impact of the Research Excellence Framework (REF) on the discipline of psychology in UK universities, highlighting the evolution of research evaluations over the past 40 years. It discusses how the REF influences funding and institutional reputation, revealing biases against qualitative research methods in favor of quantitative approaches, particularly in the context of the UoA4 (Psychology, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience) panel. The authors conducted a topic modeling analysis of nearly 10,000 journal articles submitted to UoA4, finding that submissions with a higher proportion of qualitative research received lower quality assessments. The article calls for greater epistemic diversity in the REF process to better represent the range of psychological research methodologies. [Extracted from the article]
Copyright of Psychologist is the property of British Psychological Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 191465220
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Periodical
PubTypeId: serialPeriodical
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Psychology needs a... research evaluation revolution.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stokoe%2C+Elizabeth%22">Stokoe, Elizabeth</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Inglis%2C+Matthew%22">Inglis, Matthew</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Foster%2C+Colin%22">Foster, Colin</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lortie-Forgues%2C+Hugo%22">Lortie-Forgues, Hugo</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Simms%2C+Victoria%22">Simms, Victoria</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychologist%22">Psychologist</searchLink>. Mar2026, p32-35. 4p. 1 Cartoon or Caricature.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+evaluation%22">Research evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Text+mining%22">Text mining</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavioral+sciences%22">Behavioral sciences</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The article examines the impact of the Research Excellence Framework (REF) on the discipline of psychology in UK universities, highlighting the evolution of research evaluations over the past 40 years. It discusses how the REF influences funding and institutional reputation, revealing biases against qualitative research methods in favor of quantitative approaches, particularly in the context of the UoA4 (Psychology, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience) panel. The authors conducted a topic modeling analysis of nearly 10,000 journal articles submitted to UoA4, finding that submissions with a higher proportion of qualitative research received lower quality assessments. The article calls for greater epistemic diversity in the REF process to better represent the range of psychological research methodologies. [Extracted from the article]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Psychologist is the property of British Psychological Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=191465220
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 4
        StartPage: 32
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Research evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Qualitative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Text mining
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Behavioral sciences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United Kingdom
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Psychology needs a... research evaluation revolution.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stokoe, Elizabeth
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Inglis, Matthew
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Foster, Colin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lortie-Forgues, Hugo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Simms, Victoria
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Text: Mar2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09528229
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psychologist
              Type: main
ResultId 1