Neuropsychological assessment in non-central nervous system cancer patients: a systematic review of cognitive screening and assessment within oncology practice.
Saved in:
| Title: | Neuropsychological assessment in non-central nervous system cancer patients: a systematic review of cognitive screening and assessment within oncology practice. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Capetti, Benedetta (AUTHOR), Conti, Lorenzo (AUTHOR), Ferrari, Maria Vittoria (AUTHOR), Coppini, Veronica (AUTHOR), Ferraris, Giulia (AUTHOR), Marzorati, Chiara (AUTHOR), Monzani, Dario (AUTHOR), Grasso, Roberto (AUTHOR), Pravettoni, Gabriella (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Health Psychology Review. Mar2026, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p46-110. 65p. |
| Subjects: | Cognition disorders diagnosis, Medical information storage & retrieval systems, Cognitive testing, Research funding, Cancer patient medical care, Descriptive statistics, Anxiety, Systematic reviews, MEDLINE, Neuropsychological tests, Cancer patient psychology, Medical screening, Online information services, Mental depression, Sleep disorders, Adults |
| Abstract: | Early cancer detection and innovative treatments have prolonged the lifespan of cancer patients, leading to long-term consequences, including cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). In 2011, the International Cancer and Cognition Task Force (ICCTF) established guidelines for neuropsychological assessment, however many neuropsychological tests lack validity for oncological patients. This systematic review aims to identify and summarise the most commonly used neuropsychological tests for cognitive screening and assessment in non-CNS cancer patients within research contexts. A search of electronic databases (PUBMED, EMBASE, and SCOPUS) included 1) research articles using 2) neuropsychological tests 3) on non-CNS cancer patients, 4) aged between 18 and 80 years old, 5) published in the English 6) from January 2011 to October 2023. Quality assessment was assessed following the MMAT Guidelines. Eligibility criteria were met by 178 studies which adopted 151 different neuropsychological tests. The most widely used screening test was the Mini-Mental State Examination (N=41). Among the main cognitive domains analyzed, the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (N=61) was the most commonly used to assess memory. The Controlled Oral Word Association Test (N=24) was primarily utilised for language assessment and the Trail Making Test-part A (TMT-A) (N=37) was the most frequently used to assess the attention domain. Moreover, executive functions were predominantly evaluated using the TMT-B (N=45). Among the included studies, only 42 adhered to the ICCTF guidelines. Despite the available guidelines, the wide variability of the utilised tests undermines the generalisability of results. These findings underscore the necessity of developing and implementing assessment and screening tools that are specifically tailored to cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Health Psychology Review is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 191801293 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Neuropsychological assessment in non-central nervous system cancer patients: a systematic review of cognitive screening and assessment within oncology practice. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Capetti%2C+Benedetta%22">Capetti, Benedetta</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Conti%2C+Lorenzo%22">Conti, Lorenzo</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ferrari%2C+Maria+Vittoria%22">Ferrari, Maria Vittoria</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Coppini%2C+Veronica%22">Coppini, Veronica</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ferraris%2C+Giulia%22">Ferraris, Giulia</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Marzorati%2C+Chiara%22">Marzorati, Chiara</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Monzani%2C+Dario%22">Monzani, Dario</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Grasso%2C+Roberto%22">Grasso, Roberto</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pravettoni%2C+Gabriella%22">Pravettoni, Gabriella</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Health+Psychology+Review%22">Health Psychology Review</searchLink>. Mar2026, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p46-110. 65p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognition+disorders+diagnosis%22">Cognition disorders diagnosis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Medical information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+testing%22">Cognitive testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cancer+patient+medical+care%22">Cancer patient medical care</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Anxiety%22">Anxiety</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDLINE%22">MEDLINE</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Neuropsychological+tests%22">Neuropsychological tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cancer+patient+psychology%22">Cancer patient psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+screening%22">Medical screening</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Online+information+services%22">Online information services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+depression%22">Mental depression</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sleep+disorders%22">Sleep disorders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adults%22">Adults</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Early cancer detection and innovative treatments have prolonged the lifespan of cancer patients, leading to long-term consequences, including cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). In 2011, the International Cancer and Cognition Task Force (ICCTF) established guidelines for neuropsychological assessment, however many neuropsychological tests lack validity for oncological patients. This systematic review aims to identify and summarise the most commonly used neuropsychological tests for cognitive screening and assessment in non-CNS cancer patients within research contexts. A search of electronic databases (PUBMED, EMBASE, and SCOPUS) included 1) research articles using 2) neuropsychological tests 3) on non-CNS cancer patients, 4) aged between 18 and 80 years old, 5) published in the English 6) from January 2011 to October 2023. Quality assessment was assessed following the MMAT Guidelines. Eligibility criteria were met by 178 studies which adopted 151 different neuropsychological tests. The most widely used screening test was the Mini-Mental State Examination (N=41). Among the main cognitive domains analyzed, the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (N=61) was the most commonly used to assess memory. The Controlled Oral Word Association Test (N=24) was primarily utilised for language assessment and the Trail Making Test-part A (TMT-A) (N=37) was the most frequently used to assess the attention domain. Moreover, executive functions were predominantly evaluated using the TMT-B (N=45). Among the included studies, only 42 adhered to the ICCTF guidelines. Despite the available guidelines, the wide variability of the utilised tests undermines the generalisability of results. These findings underscore the necessity of developing and implementing assessment and screening tools that are specifically tailored to cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Health Psychology Review is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=191801293 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/17437199.2025.2536071 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 65 StartPage: 46 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Cognition disorders diagnosis Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical information storage & retrieval systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: Cancer patient medical care Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Anxiety Type: general – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews Type: general – SubjectFull: MEDLINE Type: general – SubjectFull: Neuropsychological tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Cancer patient psychology Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical screening Type: general – SubjectFull: Online information services Type: general – SubjectFull: Mental depression Type: general – SubjectFull: Sleep disorders Type: general – SubjectFull: Adults Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Neuropsychological assessment in non-central nervous system cancer patients: a systematic review of cognitive screening and assessment within oncology practice. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Capetti, Benedetta – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Conti, Lorenzo – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ferrari, Maria Vittoria – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Coppini, Veronica – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ferraris, Giulia – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Marzorati, Chiara – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Monzani, Dario – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Grasso, Roberto – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Pravettoni, Gabriella IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Mar2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 17437199 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 20 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Health Psychology Review Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
