Quality indicators for palliative care for older people: An umbrella review.
Saved in:
| Title: | Quality indicators for palliative care for older people: An umbrella review. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Hutchison, Amy (AUTHOR), Spooner, Amy (AUTHOR), Parker, Deborah (AUTHOR), Yates, Patsy (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Palliative Medicine. Mar2026, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p284-296. 13p. |
| Subjects: | Clinical medicine, Elder care, Medical information storage & retrieval systems, Palliative treatment, Medical quality control, Research funding, Key performance indicators (Management), CINAHL database, Primary health care, Systematic reviews, MEDLINE, Medical databases, Quality assurance, Medical needs assessment |
| Abstract: | Background: Internationally, the ageing population is driving increased demand for palliative care across primary, aged, and healthcare sectors. Quality indicators for palliative care have been extensively researched, with systematic reviews synthesising these indicators for older populations across various care settings. Aim: To identify a comprehensive set of quality indicators for palliative care for older people. Design: A research protocol was developed following Joanna Briggs Institute's umbrella review methodology and registered with PROSPERO. Included reviews were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Instrument for Systematic Reviews and Research Synthesis. Identified quality indicators were mapped to Donabedian's quality model (structure, process, outcome) and aligned with the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality's essential elements for safe, high-quality end-of-life care. Data sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched from January 2000 to May 2025. Results: A total of 1272 records were identified, after removing duplicates 719 were screened by title and for eligibility. Four articles met the criteria, yielding 1071 quality indicators, of which 658 were unique. Among these, 402 (61%) related to the process of care, 179 (27%) to care outcomes, and 77 (12%) to structure. Conclusion: This review highlights a critical gap in quality indicators related to structure, including the physical and organisational settings of healthcare delivery. Indicators often emphasised a biomedical approach, overlooking the psychological, social, cultural, and spiritual aspects essential to high-quality palliative care. Further work is needed to develop a comprehensive, practical set of quality indicators that can be used across care settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Palliative Medicine is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 191949627 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Quality indicators for palliative care for older people: An umbrella review. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hutchison%2C+Amy%22">Hutchison, Amy</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Spooner%2C+Amy%22">Spooner, Amy</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Parker%2C+Deborah%22">Parker, Deborah</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yates%2C+Patsy%22">Yates, Patsy</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Palliative+Medicine%22">Palliative Medicine</searchLink>. Mar2026, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p284-296. 13p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+medicine%22">Clinical medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elder+care%22">Elder care</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Medical information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Palliative+treatment%22">Palliative treatment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+quality+control%22">Medical quality control</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Key+performance+indicators+%28Management%29%22">Key performance indicators (Management)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22CINAHL+database%22">CINAHL database</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Primary+health+care%22">Primary health care</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDLINE%22">MEDLINE</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+databases%22">Medical databases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quality+assurance%22">Quality assurance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+needs+assessment%22">Medical needs assessment</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Internationally, the ageing population is driving increased demand for palliative care across primary, aged, and healthcare sectors. Quality indicators for palliative care have been extensively researched, with systematic reviews synthesising these indicators for older populations across various care settings. Aim: To identify a comprehensive set of quality indicators for palliative care for older people. Design: A research protocol was developed following Joanna Briggs Institute's umbrella review methodology and registered with PROSPERO. Included reviews were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Instrument for Systematic Reviews and Research Synthesis. Identified quality indicators were mapped to Donabedian's quality model (structure, process, outcome) and aligned with the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality's essential elements for safe, high-quality end-of-life care. Data sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched from January 2000 to May 2025. Results: A total of 1272 records were identified, after removing duplicates 719 were screened by title and for eligibility. Four articles met the criteria, yielding 1071 quality indicators, of which 658 were unique. Among these, 402 (61%) related to the process of care, 179 (27%) to care outcomes, and 77 (12%) to structure. Conclusion: This review highlights a critical gap in quality indicators related to structure, including the physical and organisational settings of healthcare delivery. Indicators often emphasised a biomedical approach, overlooking the psychological, social, cultural, and spiritual aspects essential to high-quality palliative care. Further work is needed to develop a comprehensive, practical set of quality indicators that can be used across care settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Palliative Medicine is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=191949627 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/02692163251403422 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 284 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Clinical medicine Type: general – SubjectFull: Elder care Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical information storage & retrieval systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Palliative treatment Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical quality control Type: general – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: Key performance indicators (Management) Type: general – SubjectFull: CINAHL database Type: general – SubjectFull: Primary health care Type: general – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews Type: general – SubjectFull: MEDLINE Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical databases Type: general – SubjectFull: Quality assurance Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical needs assessment Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Quality indicators for palliative care for older people: An umbrella review. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hutchison, Amy – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Spooner, Amy – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Parker, Deborah – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yates, Patsy IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Mar2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 02692163 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 40 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Palliative Medicine Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |