Genetic information in insurance: Guiding questions for state regulation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Genetic information in insurance: Guiding questions for state regulation.
Authors: Prince, Anya E. R. (AUTHOR), Eckel, Theresa (AUTHOR)
Source: Science. 2/26/2026, Vol. 391 Issue 6788, p872-874. 3p.
Subjects: Genetic profile, State laws, Health insurance, Policy analysis, Discrimination (Sociology), Risk assessment, Insurance law
Abstract: In 2008, the US Congress passed the Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act (GINA) to prohibit genetic discrimination in health insurance. Some early versions included life, long-term care, and disability insurers, but the final act narrowed to health insurance for political expediency. States were left to determine whether and how to fill these gaps. Insurers have argued that access to genetic information is essential to properly calculate risk. Yet, in other contexts, like gender and race or ethnicity, states have, for societal reasons, restricted insurer use of potentially predictive information (1). Many argue that immutable genetic information should be similarly restricted in part because fear of discrimination causes individuals to decline participation in genomic research and testing (2). Given these competing interests, the scope and strength of state laws vary widely (3). In anticipation of this spring's legislative sessions, we propose guiding questions for policy-makers to consider to address the public's genetic discrimination concerns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Science is the property of American Association for the Advancement of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 191951177
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Genetic information in insurance: Guiding questions for state regulation.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Prince%2C+Anya+E%2E+R%2E%22">Prince, Anya E. R.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Eckel%2C+Theresa%22">Eckel, Theresa</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Science%22">Science</searchLink>. 2/26/2026, Vol. 391 Issue 6788, p872-874. 3p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Genetic+profile%22">Genetic profile</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+laws%22">State laws</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+insurance%22">Health insurance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Policy+analysis%22">Policy analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discrimination+%28Sociology%29%22">Discrimination (Sociology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Risk+assessment%22">Risk assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Insurance+law%22">Insurance law</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: In 2008, the US Congress passed the Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act (GINA) to prohibit genetic discrimination in health insurance. Some early versions included life, long-term care, and disability insurers, but the final act narrowed to health insurance for political expediency. States were left to determine whether and how to fill these gaps. Insurers have argued that access to genetic information is essential to properly calculate risk. Yet, in other contexts, like gender and race or ethnicity, states have, for societal reasons, restricted insurer use of potentially predictive information (1). Many argue that immutable genetic information should be similarly restricted in part because fear of discrimination causes individuals to decline participation in genomic research and testing (2). Given these competing interests, the scope and strength of state laws vary widely (3). In anticipation of this spring's legislative sessions, we propose guiding questions for policy-makers to consider to address the public's genetic discrimination concerns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Science is the property of American Association for the Advancement of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=191951177
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1126/science.aee2317
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 3
        StartPage: 872
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Genetic profile
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: State laws
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health insurance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Policy analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Discrimination (Sociology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Risk assessment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Insurance law
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Genetic information in insurance: Guiding questions for state regulation.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Prince, Anya E. R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Eckel, Theresa
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 26
              M: 02
              Text: 2/26/2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00368075
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 391
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6788
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Science
              Type: main
ResultId 1