The impact of screening procedures on sexual assault estimates in college women: a brief report.
Saved in:
| Title: | The impact of screening procedures on sexual assault estimates in college women: a brief report. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Presutti, Emily (AUTHOR), Firkey, Madison (AUTHOR), Woolf-King, Sarah. E. (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of American College Health. Feb2026, Vol. 74 Issue 2, p282-286. 5p. |
| Subjects: | Self-evaluation, Sex crimes, Control (Psychology), Research funding, Human sexuality, Universities & colleges, Questionnaires, Psychology of women, Rape, Descriptive statistics, Experimental design, Sex customs, Surveys, Statistics, Psychology of college students, Data analysis software, Sociodemographic factors, Self-disclosure |
| Abstract: | Introduction: Sexual assault on U.S. college campuses remains a pervasive public health concern for college women, yet accurately estimating its prevalence presents ongoing challenges. Behaviorally-specific survey items yield significantly higher disclosure rates than single-item gate questions (e.g., "Have you ever been raped?"). This study compares these approaches in measuring forced penetration among college women. Methods: Data were collected from Fall 2021 to Fall 2023 as part of an experimental study examining barriers to sexual refusal assertiveness. A total of 199 college women ages 18–25 completed behavioral measures assessing unwanted sexual experiences. Results: Reports of forced penetration were approximately five times higher using a behaviorally-specific measure compared to a single gate question. Discussion: These findings highlight the need for universities to use behaviorally-specific assessments in campus climate surveys to more accurately capture the scope of sexual assault and adequately support prevention and survivor resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of American College Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 191985127 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The impact of screening procedures on sexual assault estimates in college women: a brief report. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Presutti%2C+Emily%22">Presutti, Emily</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Firkey%2C+Madison%22">Firkey, Madison</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Woolf-King%2C+Sarah%2E+E%2E%22">Woolf-King, Sarah. E.</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+American+College+Health%22">Journal of American College Health</searchLink>. Feb2026, Vol. 74 Issue 2, p282-286. 5p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-evaluation%22">Self-evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex+crimes%22">Sex crimes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Control+%28Psychology%29%22">Control (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+sexuality%22">Human sexuality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Universities+%26+colleges%22">Universities & colleges</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+of+women%22">Psychology of women</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rape%22">Rape</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experimental+design%22">Experimental design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex+customs%22">Sex customs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistics%22">Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+of+college+students%22">Psychology of college students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sociodemographic+factors%22">Sociodemographic factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-disclosure%22">Self-disclosure</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Introduction: Sexual assault on U.S. college campuses remains a pervasive public health concern for college women, yet accurately estimating its prevalence presents ongoing challenges. Behaviorally-specific survey items yield significantly higher disclosure rates than single-item gate questions (e.g., "Have you ever been raped?"). This study compares these approaches in measuring forced penetration among college women. Methods: Data were collected from Fall 2021 to Fall 2023 as part of an experimental study examining barriers to sexual refusal assertiveness. A total of 199 college women ages 18–25 completed behavioral measures assessing unwanted sexual experiences. Results: Reports of forced penetration were approximately five times higher using a behaviorally-specific measure compared to a single gate question. Discussion: These findings highlight the need for universities to use behaviorally-specific assessments in campus climate surveys to more accurately capture the scope of sexual assault and adequately support prevention and survivor resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of American College Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=191985127 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/07448481.2025.2533920 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 5 StartPage: 282 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Self-evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Sex crimes Type: general – SubjectFull: Control (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: Human sexuality Type: general – SubjectFull: Universities & colleges Type: general – SubjectFull: Questionnaires Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychology of women Type: general – SubjectFull: Rape Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Experimental design Type: general – SubjectFull: Sex customs Type: general – SubjectFull: Surveys Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychology of college students Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis software Type: general – SubjectFull: Sociodemographic factors Type: general – SubjectFull: Self-disclosure Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The impact of screening procedures on sexual assault estimates in college women: a brief report. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Presutti, Emily – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Firkey, Madison – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Woolf-King, Sarah. E. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Text: Feb2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 07448481 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 74 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of American College Health Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |