Medical and nursing students' interprofessional feedback orientations: transitioning from classroom to workplace education.
Saved in:
| Title: | Medical and nursing students' interprofessional feedback orientations: transitioning from classroom to workplace education. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Tielemans, Claudia J. M. (AUTHOR), de Kleijn, Renske A. M. (AUTHOR), van der Schaaf, Marieke F. (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Interprofessional Care. Mar/Apr2026, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p292-300. 9p. |
| Subjects: | Psychology of college students, Interdisciplinary education, Mental orientation, Teams in the workplace, School environment, Curriculum, Self-evaluation, Research funding, Focus groups, Philosophy of education, Interprofessional relations, Data analysis, T-test (Statistics), Work environment, Questionnaires, Quantitative research, Professional identity, Descriptive statistics, Longitudinal method, Transitional programs (Education), Research, Communication, One-way analysis of variance, Statistics, Baccalaureate nursing education, Student attitudes, Learning strategies, Comparative studies, Nursing students |
| Abstract: | We investigated how medical and nursing students' perceptions of interprofessional teamwork and feedback orientations change as they transition from classroom to workplace learning. Participants were undergraduate 5th-year medical and 4th-year nursing students in the workplace phase of their training, enrolled in an interprofessional feedback intervention. At three time points (week 1 and 2 classroom; week 14 workplace), we measured students: Dual-role Feedback Orientation, Interprofessional Teamwork Valuing, and Definition of the Interprofessional Team. Analyses of variance were used to identify changes over time. Of the 538 (46%) students who responded in week 1, 65 followed up at the other two time points. Students consistently valued interprofessional teamwork and viewed feedback they received as important for their development. However, students' utility as feedback givers significantly dropped in the workplace. Self-efficacy in using and giving feedback was lower than other variables but stable over training phases. Accountability to give and use feedback increased in the classroom and was sustained in the workplace. The decline in feedback giver utility suggests a negative workplace effect, possibly due to a lack of opportunities to practice giving feedback. Future efforts should focus on supporting students in maintaining their interprofessional feedback skills during the transition from classroom to workplace. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Interprofessional Care is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 192006001 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Medical and nursing students' interprofessional feedback orientations: transitioning from classroom to workplace education. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tielemans%2C+Claudia+J%2E+M%2E%22">Tielemans, Claudia J. M.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22de+Kleijn%2C+Renske+A%2E+M%2E%22">de Kleijn, Renske A. M.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+der+Schaaf%2C+Marieke+F%2E%22">van der Schaaf, Marieke F.</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Interprofessional+Care%22">Journal of Interprofessional Care</searchLink>. Mar/Apr2026, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p292-300. 9p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+of+college+students%22">Psychology of college students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interdisciplinary+education%22">Interdisciplinary education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+orientation%22">Mental orientation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teams+in+the+workplace%22">Teams in the workplace</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+environment%22">School environment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum%22">Curriculum</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-evaluation%22">Self-evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Focus+groups%22">Focus groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Philosophy+of+education%22">Philosophy of education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interprofessional+relations%22">Interprofessional relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis%22">Data analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22T-test+%28Statistics%29%22">T-test (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Work+environment%22">Work environment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quantitative+research%22">Quantitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+identity%22">Professional identity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Longitudinal+method%22">Longitudinal method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Transitional+programs+%28Education%29%22">Transitional programs (Education)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research%22">Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communication%22">Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22One-way+analysis+of+variance%22">One-way analysis of variance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistics%22">Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Baccalaureate+nursing+education%22">Baccalaureate nursing education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+attitudes%22">Student attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+strategies%22">Learning strategies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+studies%22">Comparative studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nursing+students%22">Nursing students</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: We investigated how medical and nursing students' perceptions of interprofessional teamwork and feedback orientations change as they transition from classroom to workplace learning. Participants were undergraduate 5th-year medical and 4th-year nursing students in the workplace phase of their training, enrolled in an interprofessional feedback intervention. At three time points (week 1 and 2 classroom; week 14 workplace), we measured students: Dual-role Feedback Orientation, Interprofessional Teamwork Valuing, and Definition of the Interprofessional Team. Analyses of variance were used to identify changes over time. Of the 538 (46%) students who responded in week 1, 65 followed up at the other two time points. Students consistently valued interprofessional teamwork and viewed feedback they received as important for their development. However, students' utility as feedback givers significantly dropped in the workplace. Self-efficacy in using and giving feedback was lower than other variables but stable over training phases. Accountability to give and use feedback increased in the classroom and was sustained in the workplace. The decline in feedback giver utility suggests a negative workplace effect, possibly due to a lack of opportunities to practice giving feedback. Future efforts should focus on supporting students in maintaining their interprofessional feedback skills during the transition from classroom to workplace. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Interprofessional Care is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=192006001 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/13561820.2025.2595940 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 9 StartPage: 292 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Psychology of college students Type: general – SubjectFull: Interdisciplinary education Type: general – SubjectFull: Mental orientation Type: general – SubjectFull: Teams in the workplace Type: general – SubjectFull: School environment Type: general – SubjectFull: Curriculum Type: general – SubjectFull: Self-evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: Focus groups Type: general – SubjectFull: Philosophy of education Type: general – SubjectFull: Interprofessional relations Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: T-test (Statistics) Type: general – SubjectFull: Work environment Type: general – SubjectFull: Questionnaires Type: general – SubjectFull: Quantitative research Type: general – SubjectFull: Professional identity Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Longitudinal method Type: general – SubjectFull: Transitional programs (Education) Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Type: general – SubjectFull: Communication Type: general – SubjectFull: One-way analysis of variance Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Baccalaureate nursing education Type: general – SubjectFull: Student attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning strategies Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Nursing students Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Medical and nursing students' interprofessional feedback orientations: transitioning from classroom to workplace education. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tielemans, Claudia J. M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: de Kleijn, Renske A. M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: van der Schaaf, Marieke F. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Mar/Apr2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 13561820 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 40 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Interprofessional Care Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |