The effect on science of government cuts to doctoral scholarships.
Saved in:
| Title: | The effect on science of government cuts to doctoral scholarships. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Rossello, Giulia (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Studies in Higher Education. Mar2026, Vol. 51 Issue 3, p665-683. 19p. |
| Subjects: | College scholarships, Doctoral programs, Educational finance, Scholarly publishing, Orbán, Viktor, 1963-, STEM education, Right to education, Budget cuts, Education policy |
| Geographic Terms: | Hungary |
| Abstract: | The 'there are too many PhDs' debate lacks evidence on the consequences of reducing the number of PhDs. This paper provides causal estimates of the impact on STEM students of cuts to government-funded PhD scholarships based on a unique quasi-natural experiment. I use data on the staggered cuts made by the Hungarian Government between 2010 and 2021 to expand Orbàn's political influence over the university system. The political aim of these cuts ensures that they are exogenous to the economic cycle and universities' evolution. The analysis uses the enrolment records of all doctoral students in Hungary and employs a generalized difference-in-differences approach. The results show that a severe cut to PhD scholarships increases the chance of PhD completion by 1 percentage point (pp) but that this positive effect is countered by a persistent and growing reduction in female and first-generation student entry rates. This suggests that while they might result in improved training and/or a more efficient education system, cuts to scholarships will come at the expense of inclusion. Additionally, the findings indicate that the negative impact on scientific production is temporary, with doctoral student productivity decreasing by 2pp and the quality of scientific output declining by 0.2–1pp. My results highlight these tradeoffs. Cuts to funding that reduce the numbers of PhD scholarships might increase efficiency in terms of student attainment but are likely to reduce inclusion, scientific production, and research quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Studies in Higher Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 192007620 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The effect on science of government cuts to doctoral scholarships. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rossello%2C+Giulia%22">Rossello, Giulia</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Studies+in+Higher+Education%22">Studies in Higher Education</searchLink>. Mar2026, Vol. 51 Issue 3, p665-683. 19p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+scholarships%22">College scholarships</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Doctoral+programs%22">Doctoral programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+finance%22">Educational finance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scholarly+publishing%22">Scholarly publishing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Orbán%2C+Viktor%2C+1963-%22">Orbán, Viktor, 1963-</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22STEM+education%22">STEM education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Right+to+education%22">Right to education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Budget+cuts%22">Budget cuts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education+policy%22">Education policy</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hungary%22">Hungary</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The 'there are too many PhDs' debate lacks evidence on the consequences of reducing the number of PhDs. This paper provides causal estimates of the impact on STEM students of cuts to government-funded PhD scholarships based on a unique quasi-natural experiment. I use data on the staggered cuts made by the Hungarian Government between 2010 and 2021 to expand Orbàn's political influence over the university system. The political aim of these cuts ensures that they are exogenous to the economic cycle and universities' evolution. The analysis uses the enrolment records of all doctoral students in Hungary and employs a generalized difference-in-differences approach. The results show that a severe cut to PhD scholarships increases the chance of PhD completion by 1 percentage point (pp) but that this positive effect is countered by a persistent and growing reduction in female and first-generation student entry rates. This suggests that while they might result in improved training and/or a more efficient education system, cuts to scholarships will come at the expense of inclusion. Additionally, the findings indicate that the negative impact on scientific production is temporary, with doctoral student productivity decreasing by 2pp and the quality of scientific output declining by 0.2–1pp. My results highlight these tradeoffs. Cuts to funding that reduce the numbers of PhD scholarships might increase efficiency in terms of student attainment but are likely to reduce inclusion, scientific production, and research quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Studies in Higher Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=192007620 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/03075079.2025.2484656 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 19 StartPage: 665 Subjects: – SubjectFull: College scholarships Type: general – SubjectFull: Doctoral programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational finance Type: general – SubjectFull: Scholarly publishing Type: general – SubjectFull: Orbán, Viktor, 1963- Type: general – SubjectFull: STEM education Type: general – SubjectFull: Right to education Type: general – SubjectFull: Budget cuts Type: general – SubjectFull: Education policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Hungary Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The effect on science of government cuts to doctoral scholarships. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rossello, Giulia IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Mar2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 03075079 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 51 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Studies in Higher Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |