Assessing sexual and gender identity interaction with the relationship between caregiving and adverse mental health outcomes.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Assessing sexual and gender identity interaction with the relationship between caregiving and adverse mental health outcomes.
Authors: Wilson II, G. Thomas (AUTHOR), Gimm, Gilbert (AUTHOR), Turpin, Rodman (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Mental Health. Apr2026, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p174-185. 12p.
Subjects: Mental illness risk factors, Mental depression risk factors, Risk assessment, Psychology of gay people, Cross-sectional method, Gender identity, Research funding, Mental health, Sexual orientation identity, Sex distribution, Transgender people, Kruskal-Wallis Test, Multiple regression analysis, Chi-squared test, Descriptive statistics, Burden of care, Cisgender people, Statistics, Sexual minorities, Psychology of caregivers, Confidence intervals, Bisexual people, Data analysis software, Mental depression, Psychosocial factors, Adults
Geographic Terms: Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho, Louisiana, United States
Abstract: Background: Caregivers often report high stress levels, which may be associated with adverse mental health. Less is known about adult sexual and gender minority (SGM) caregivers' experienced stress and/or mental health considering they are likely at increased vulnerability to these outcomes due to social stigma, familial estrangement, and discrimination. Aims: We tested relationships between caregiving and adverse mental health and if these associations were modified by SGM identity. Methods: Using 2023 national BRFSS data (n = 32,151) we examined relationships between caregiving and two outcomes: depression and 14+ days with poor mental health, testing effect modification by SGM identity. Regression analyses, using both SGM and caregiving cross-categories and interaction term models were also conducted. Results: Compared to heterosexual non-caregivers, both caregiving and SGM status were associated with greater depression and having 14+ days of poor mental health, with the highest prevalence of depression among transgender caregivers (aPR = 4.05, CI 3.03–5.00), transgender non-caregivers (aPR = 2.80, CI 2.24–3.25), and cisgender gay caregivers (aPR = 2.52, CI 2.01–2.93). Transgender and cisgender gay and bisexual caregivers also had the highest days with poor mental health. Additionally, interaction term models identified effect modification. Conclusions: Disproportionate adverse mental health outcomes exist among caregivers, modified by SGM status. Longitudinal research is needed to understand these mechanisms and related outcomes including substance use and suicidality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Mental Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first