Stakeholder Perspectives on Applying for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program in Low‐Resource Schools.
Saved in:
| Title: | Stakeholder Perspectives on Applying for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program in Low‐Resource Schools. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Hoy, Kathryn (AUTHOR), Jones, Sonya (AUTHOR), Davis, Rachel E. (AUTHOR), Blake, Christine (AUTHOR), Burke, Michael (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of School Health. May2026, Vol. 96 Issue 5, p1-13. 13p. |
| Subjects: | Prevention of chronic diseases, Fruit, Supervision of employees, Nurses, School environment, Elementary schools, Human services programs, Executives, Psychology of teachers, Qualitative research, Endowments, Dietary patterns, Food security, Statistical sampling, Interviewing, Equality, Evaluation of human services programs, Decision making, Child nutrition, School administrators, Parent attitudes, Judgment sampling, Hunger, Food service, Sound recordings, Ethics, Thematic analysis, Motivation (Psychology), Attention, Vegetables, Food relief, College teacher attitudes, Nurses' attitudes, School nursing, Research, Ability, Community life, Resource-limited settings, Psychology of parents, Stakeholder analysis, Management, Training |
| Geographic Terms: | South Carolina |
| Abstract: | Background: The USDA Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP) was designed to increase access to nutritious foods in low‐income schools; however, many eligible schools do not participate. This study explores how school stakeholders in low‐resource settings make decisions about applying for the FFVP grant. Methods: Fifty‐four one‐hour in‐depth interviews were conducted with stakeholders from 14 low‐income South Carolina public schools. Interviews were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Stakeholders applied for an FFVP grant when they believed the program would benefit students, felt a moral obligation to address injustices, perceived the school as eligible, and thought they had the capacity to manage the program's administrative burdens. Common barriers reported were being overburdened with other responsibilities at the school level, a lack of funding continuity, and not having physical space to accommodate the produce snacks. Implications for School Health Policy, Practice, and Equity: Reframing narratives surrounding child hunger and nutrition programs from welfare state and free‐market frames could augment applications as it reduces contextual and systematic barriers to application. Conclusions: This study shows that school stakeholder motivations for application emphasize context surrounding child well‐being and moral imperatives in addition to eligibility systems and capacity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of School Health is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 193399512 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Stakeholder Perspectives on Applying for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program in Low‐Resource Schools. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hoy%2C+Kathryn%22">Hoy, Kathryn</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jones%2C+Sonya%22">Jones, Sonya</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Davis%2C+Rachel+E%2E%22">Davis, Rachel E.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Blake%2C+Christine%22">Blake, Christine</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burke%2C+Michael%22">Burke, Michael</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+School+Health%22">Journal of School Health</searchLink>. May2026, Vol. 96 Issue 5, p1-13. 13p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prevention+of+chronic+diseases%22">Prevention of chronic diseases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Fruit%22">Fruit</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Supervision+of+employees%22">Supervision of employees</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nurses%22">Nurses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+environment%22">School environment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+schools%22">Elementary schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+services+programs%22">Human services programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Executives%22">Executives</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+of+teachers%22">Psychology of teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Endowments%22">Endowments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dietary+patterns%22">Dietary patterns</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Food+security%22">Food security</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+sampling%22">Statistical sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Equality%22">Equality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+of+human+services+programs%22">Evaluation of human services programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making%22">Decision making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Child+nutrition%22">Child nutrition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+administrators%22">School administrators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Parent+attitudes%22">Parent attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Judgment+sampling%22">Judgment sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hunger%22">Hunger</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Food+service%22">Food service</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sound+recordings%22">Sound recordings</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Motivation+%28Psychology%29%22">Motivation (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attention%22">Attention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vegetables%22">Vegetables</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Food+relief%22">Food relief</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+teacher+attitudes%22">College teacher attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nurses'+attitudes%22">Nurses' attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+nursing%22">School nursing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research%22">Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ability%22">Ability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Community+life%22">Community life</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Resource-limited+settings%22">Resource-limited settings</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+of+parents%22">Psychology of parents</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stakeholder+analysis%22">Stakeholder analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Management%22">Management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Training%22">Training</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22South+Carolina%22">South Carolina</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: The USDA Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP) was designed to increase access to nutritious foods in low‐income schools; however, many eligible schools do not participate. This study explores how school stakeholders in low‐resource settings make decisions about applying for the FFVP grant. Methods: Fifty‐four one‐hour in‐depth interviews were conducted with stakeholders from 14 low‐income South Carolina public schools. Interviews were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Stakeholders applied for an FFVP grant when they believed the program would benefit students, felt a moral obligation to address injustices, perceived the school as eligible, and thought they had the capacity to manage the program's administrative burdens. Common barriers reported were being overburdened with other responsibilities at the school level, a lack of funding continuity, and not having physical space to accommodate the produce snacks. Implications for School Health Policy, Practice, and Equity: Reframing narratives surrounding child hunger and nutrition programs from welfare state and free‐market frames could augment applications as it reduces contextual and systematic barriers to application. Conclusions: This study shows that school stakeholder motivations for application emphasize context surrounding child well‐being and moral imperatives in addition to eligibility systems and capacity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of School Health is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=193399512 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/josh.70151 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Prevention of chronic diseases Type: general – SubjectFull: Fruit Type: general – SubjectFull: Supervision of employees Type: general – SubjectFull: Nurses Type: general – SubjectFull: School environment Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Human services programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Executives Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychology of teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Qualitative research Type: general – SubjectFull: Endowments Type: general – SubjectFull: Dietary patterns Type: general – SubjectFull: Food security Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical sampling Type: general – SubjectFull: Interviewing Type: general – SubjectFull: Equality Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation of human services programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision making Type: general – SubjectFull: Child nutrition Type: general – SubjectFull: School administrators Type: general – SubjectFull: Parent attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Judgment sampling Type: general – SubjectFull: Hunger Type: general – SubjectFull: Food service Type: general – SubjectFull: Sound recordings Type: general – SubjectFull: Ethics Type: general – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Motivation (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Attention Type: general – SubjectFull: Vegetables Type: general – SubjectFull: Food relief Type: general – SubjectFull: College teacher attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Nurses' attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: School nursing Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Type: general – SubjectFull: Ability Type: general – SubjectFull: Community life Type: general – SubjectFull: Resource-limited settings Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychology of parents Type: general – SubjectFull: Stakeholder analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Management Type: general – SubjectFull: Training Type: general – SubjectFull: South Carolina Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Stakeholder Perspectives on Applying for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program in Low‐Resource Schools. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hoy, Kathryn – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jones, Sonya – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Davis, Rachel E. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Blake, Christine – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burke, Michael IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: May2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00224391 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 96 – Type: issue Value: 5 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of School Health Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |