View in EDS

Community consultation to inform sexual function research design with transgender and non-binary populations.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Community consultation to inform sexual function research design with transgender and non-binary populations.
Authors: Walker, Lauren M. (AUTHOR), Bilash, Tristan (AUTHOR), Sesay, Gloria (AUTHOR), Santos-Iglesias, Pablo (AUTHOR), Thompson, Nicole (AUTHOR), Jablonski, Ted (AUTHOR)
Source: Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. Apr2026, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p107-119. 13p.
Subjects: Research funding, Qualitative research, Interviewing, Nonbinary people, Communities, Descriptive statistics, Experimental design, Research methodology
Abstract: Sexual function is an important component of sexual well-being; however, the body of literature on sexual function has been developed almost exclusively by and for cisgender populations. This body of work overlooks the unique experiences of transgender and non-binary (TNB) populations, including potential differences in how TNB people experience sexual function, use their bodies for sexual activity, and refer to their genital anatomy. An initial research study design was developed by a team of representative professionals working in transgender care and sex research. A consultative community engagement approach was used to refine the study design. Community members provided feedback on the research methodology. Suggestions were incorporated into the study design to improve inclusivity, increase intersectional awareness, and reduce risks associated with conducting sexual function research within the TNB community. The study design carefully integrated community feedback on the following six main areas: (a) de-pathologizing gender, (b) checking and correcting assumptions, (c) addressing "the fallacy of the gender transition," (d) promoting trust and safety, (e) using a trauma-informed approach, and (f) conducting research with persistence and humility. The resulting research design included a sensitively constructed semi-structured interview guide querying gender identity, preferred terminology for anatomy, sexual expression, and sexual function. Results provide invaluable feedback for conducting sexual function research within and on behalf of TNB communities and can be used to inform researchers interested in designing similar sex research studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:Sexual function is an important component of sexual well-being; however, the body of literature on sexual function has been developed almost exclusively by and for cisgender populations. This body of work overlooks the unique experiences of transgender and non-binary (TNB) populations, including potential differences in how TNB people experience sexual function, use their bodies for sexual activity, and refer to their genital anatomy. An initial research study design was developed by a team of representative professionals working in transgender care and sex research. A consultative community engagement approach was used to refine the study design. Community members provided feedback on the research methodology. Suggestions were incorporated into the study design to improve inclusivity, increase intersectional awareness, and reduce risks associated with conducting sexual function research within the TNB community. The study design carefully integrated community feedback on the following six main areas: (a) de-pathologizing gender, (b) checking and correcting assumptions, (c) addressing "the fallacy of the gender transition," (d) promoting trust and safety, (e) using a trauma-informed approach, and (f) conducting research with persistence and humility. The resulting research design included a sensitively constructed semi-structured interview guide querying gender identity, preferred terminology for anatomy, sexual expression, and sexual function. Results provide invaluable feedback for conducting sexual function research within and on behalf of TNB communities and can be used to inform researchers interested in designing similar sex research studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:11884517
DOI:10.3138/cjhs-2026-0002