View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Operationalizing Informed Consent in Psychological Assessment: Ethical Issues and Considerations.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Operationalizing Informed Consent in Psychological Assessment: Ethical Issues and Considerations.
Authors: Cowie, Kiefer D. (AUTHOR), Shea, Kelly E. (AUTHOR), Wu, Jenny Liang (AUTHOR), AhnAllen, Christopher G. (AUTHOR), Sinclair, Samuel Justin (AUTHOR)
Source: Ethical Human Psychology & Psychiatry. 2026, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p49-70. 22p.
Subjects: Informed consent (Law), Ethical problems, Psychological tests, Professional standards, Genomics, Consent (Law)
Abstract: Psychologists routinely conduct psychological assessment in a wide range of contexts to inform various referral questions and decision-making processes. The results of psychological assessments can have meaningful real-world consequences on a person's life, and psychologists therefore shoulder an important ethical responsibility to obtain informed consent (with few exceptions). Despite this, the existing professional guidelines established by governing bodies like the American Psychological Association for operationalizing and obtaining informed consent are opaque at best and at points inherently inconsistent. Given this, there is great potential for assessors to differ substantively in the depth, specificity, and quality of information that is provided to patients during this process, which raises important ethical questions. This article reviews the current heterogeneity (and inconsistencies) in informed consent standards and ethical dilemmas to consider when conducting psychological assessment. A review of concepts from the genomics literature that are relevant to these issues is also discussed as a means of informing current practices in psychological assessment contexts. The article concludes with a call for clearer guidance and specific standards for operationalizing informed consent processes within psychological assessment settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Ethical Human Psychology & Psychiatry is the property of Springer Publishing Company, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 193598860
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Operationalizing Informed Consent in Psychological Assessment: Ethical Issues and Considerations.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cowie%2C+Kiefer+D%2E%22">Cowie, Kiefer D.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shea%2C+Kelly+E%2E%22">Shea, Kelly E.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wu%2C+Jenny+Liang%22">Wu, Jenny Liang</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22AhnAllen%2C+Christopher+G%2E%22">AhnAllen, Christopher G.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sinclair%2C+Samuel+Justin%22">Sinclair, Samuel Justin</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Ethical+Human+Psychology+%26+Psychiatry%22">Ethical Human Psychology & Psychiatry</searchLink>. 2026, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p49-70. 22p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Informed+consent+%28Law%29%22">Informed consent (Law)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethical+problems%22">Ethical problems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+tests%22">Psychological tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+standards%22">Professional standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Genomics%22">Genomics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Consent+%28Law%29%22">Consent (Law)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Psychologists routinely conduct psychological assessment in a wide range of contexts to inform various referral questions and decision-making processes. The results of psychological assessments can have meaningful real-world consequences on a person's life, and psychologists therefore shoulder an important ethical responsibility to obtain informed consent (with few exceptions). Despite this, the existing professional guidelines established by governing bodies like the American Psychological Association for operationalizing and obtaining informed consent are opaque at best and at points inherently inconsistent. Given this, there is great potential for assessors to differ substantively in the depth, specificity, and quality of information that is provided to patients during this process, which raises important ethical questions. This article reviews the current heterogeneity (and inconsistencies) in informed consent standards and ethical dilemmas to consider when conducting psychological assessment. A review of concepts from the genomics literature that are relevant to these issues is also discussed as a means of informing current practices in psychological assessment contexts. The article concludes with a call for clearer guidance and specific standards for operationalizing informed consent processes within psychological assessment settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Ethical Human Psychology & Psychiatry is the property of Springer Publishing Company, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=193598860
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1891/EHPP-2025-0011
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 22
        StartPage: 49
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Informed consent (Law)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethical problems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychological tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Professional standards
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Genomics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Consent (Law)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Operationalizing Informed Consent in Psychological Assessment: Ethical Issues and Considerations.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cowie, Kiefer D.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shea, Kelly E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wu, Jenny Liang
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: AhnAllen, Christopher G.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sinclair, Samuel Justin
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: 2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 15594343
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 28
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Ethical Human Psychology & Psychiatry
              Type: main
ResultId 1