Understanding factors that could influence feasibility and acceptability of brief CAT for adults who self‐harm: A qualitative exploration using the theoretical framework of acceptability.
Saved in:
| Title: | Understanding factors that could influence feasibility and acceptability of brief CAT for adults who self‐harm: A qualitative exploration using the theoretical framework of acceptability. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Adeyemi, Isabel (AUTHOR), Marlow, Katie (AUTHOR), Asmal, Sadika (AUTHOR), Pritchard, Stephen (AUTHOR), Uddin, Fatima Saima (AUTHOR), Latham, Cameron (AUTHOR), Robinson, Catherine (AUTHOR), Dunn, Barnaby D. (AUTHOR), Kellett, Stephen (AUTHOR), Taylor, Peter (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice. Jun2026, Vol. 99 Issue 2, p783-800. 18p. |
| Subjects: | Self-injurious behavior, Qualitative research, Self-efficacy, Research funding, Interviewing, Statistical sampling, Brief psychotherapy, Treatment effectiveness, Descriptive statistics, Randomized controlled trials, Thematic analysis, Conceptual structures, Research methodology, Cognitive therapy |
| Geographic Terms: | England |
| Abstract: | Introduction: Self‐harm in adults is a complex and highly prevalent problem. The Relational Approach to Treating Self‐Harm (RELATE, ISRCTN code: ISRCTN75661422) trial investigated the feasibility, acceptability and safety of 8‐session cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) for self‐harm, compared with treatment as usual. This qualitative evaluation explored participants' experiences of study processes and of brief CAT. Method: Semi‐structured one‐to‐one interviews were carried out with N = 24 participants and reflexive thematic analysis explored participants' experiences. Results: Five themes were identified supporting the perceived acceptability of the trial and the therapy. Being responsible to accept uncertainty was the concern prior to and at the start of the CAT and centred on a sense of vulnerability during the therapy itself. Self‐acceptance through more understanding and taking ownership illustrated understandings of how CAT worked. Living with urges was seen as the impact of the CAT on impulsivity, and being prepared for the end of treatment was a key factor in the overall view of brief CAT. Conclusions: Brief CAT for self‐harm appears acceptable in terms of intervention coherence, self‐efficacy and perceived effectiveness. Anticipation of increased vulnerability (i.e., affective attitudes) and the energy required (i.e., burden) in talking through difficulties and trauma suggest a need to manage patient expectations before brief CAT is started. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
Be the first to leave a comment!
