Nursing care provision for people with intellectual disabilities in institutions: A Taiwanese perspective.
Saved in:
| Title: | Nursing care provision for people with intellectual disabilities in institutions: A Taiwanese perspective. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Chwo, Miao‐Ju (AUTHOR), Lin, Jin‐Ding (AUTHOR), Loh, Ching‐Hui (AUTHOR), Yen, Chia‐Feng (AUTHOR), Wu, Jia‐Ling (AUTHOR), Lee, Tzung‐Nan (AUTHOR), Tang, Chi‐Chieh (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability. Dec2005, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p193-198. 6p. 6 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Nursing, Medical care, Developmental disabilities, People with intellectual disabilities, Medical personnel, Labor supply, Occupational therapists, Physical therapists, Nurses, Associations, institutions, etc. |
| Geographic Terms: | Taiwan |
| Abstract: | Background Little attention has been paid to the healthcare workforce in determining healthcare management for people with intellectual disability (ID) in institutions in Taiwan. This paper investigated the profile of the healthcare workforce among institutions caring for people with ID, and examined differences, particularly in relation to nursing staff numbers, between the various types of settings providing care. Method Data were provided by 121 institutions caring for people with ID in Taiwan. Structured questionnaires were completed at these institutions, providing a cross‐sectional survey. Results Nurses were the main health professionals employed in institutions. Even so, more than half the institutions (52.1%) did not have a nurse on their staff. The larger the size of the institution, the more likely it was that nursing staff were employed there. With regard to the relationship between institutional operating structure and the employment of nursing personnel, public institutions were more likely to employ nurses than private institutions or privately operated state‐owned institutions (POSOE). However there was no statistically significant difference among the various operating structures in terms of the ratio of nurses to people with ID. Conclusions The results highlight the importance of examining the regulation of an appropriate ratio of nurses: people with ID in institutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Background Little attention has been paid to the healthcare workforce in determining healthcare management for people with intellectual disability (ID) in institutions in Taiwan. This paper investigated the profile of the healthcare workforce among institutions caring for people with ID, and examined differences, particularly in relation to nursing staff numbers, between the various types of settings providing care. Method Data were provided by 121 institutions caring for people with ID in Taiwan. Structured questionnaires were completed at these institutions, providing a cross‐sectional survey. Results Nurses were the main health professionals employed in institutions. Even so, more than half the institutions (52.1%) did not have a nurse on their staff. The larger the size of the institution, the more likely it was that nursing staff were employed there. With regard to the relationship between institutional operating structure and the employment of nursing personnel, public institutions were more likely to employ nurses than private institutions or privately operated state‐owned institutions (POSOE). However there was no statistically significant difference among the various operating structures in terms of the ratio of nurses to people with ID. Conclusions The results highlight the importance of examining the regulation of an appropriate ratio of nurses: people with ID in institutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 13668250 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/13668250500349383 |
