View in EDS

The Feasibility of a Co‐Designed Online Healthy Living Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Valuable Content, But Limited Engagement.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Feasibility of a Co‐Designed Online Healthy Living Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Valuable Content, But Limited Engagement.
Authors: Leske, Morgan (AUTHOR), Koczwara, Bogda (AUTHOR), Blunt, Jason (AUTHOR), Short, Camille E. (AUTHOR), Daly, Anthony (AUTHOR), Morris, Julia N. (AUTHOR), Degner, Jon (AUTHOR), Beatty, Lisa (AUTHOR)
Source: Psycho-Oncology. May2026, Vol. 35 Issue 5, p1-6. 6p.
Subjects: Cancer survivors, Participatory design, Mental health services, Digital technology, Digital health, Feasibility studies, Self-help techniques
Abstract: Introduction: Healthy Living after Cancer (HLaC) was an evidence‐based, telephone‐delivered lifestyle program for survivors. HLaC Online was co‐designed with cancer survivors, healthcare professionals, and cancer support representatives to enhance sustainability and reach through a self‐directed digital format, while incorporating both physical health and mental health content. This study examined HLaC Online's feasibility. Methods: Eleven Australian post‐treatment cancer survivors participated in a 12‐week, single‐arm pilot with mixed‐methods evaluation. Feasibility indicators included uptake, usage, attrition, usability, satisfaction, and indicators of preliminary efficacy. Results: Of 318 website visitors, 11 enrolled, with nearly half never logging in. Module usage was limited (M = 3.3 of 9 modules) and only 5 completed follow‐up. Perceived usability of HLaC Online was varied (rated F− B+). Qualitative feedback highlighted the relevance of psychosocial modules, but engagement was hindered by technology barriers, cancer‐related symptoms, and lack of guidance. Participants suggested human support for orientation, accountability, and motivation. Conclusions: While HLaC Online was valued for its co‐designed mental health focus, feasibility was limited without guidance. Findings raise questions about which survivors can benefit from self‐directed digital programs versus those requiring human support. Future work should explore referral pathways, scalable human support models, and tailoring by need. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psycho-Oncology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 194139531
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Feasibility of a Co‐Designed Online Healthy Living Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Valuable Content, But Limited Engagement.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leske%2C+Morgan%22">Leske, Morgan</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Koczwara%2C+Bogda%22">Koczwara, Bogda</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Blunt%2C+Jason%22">Blunt, Jason</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Short%2C+Camille+E%2E%22">Short, Camille E.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Daly%2C+Anthony%22">Daly, Anthony</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Morris%2C+Julia+N%2E%22">Morris, Julia N.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Degner%2C+Jon%22">Degner, Jon</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Beatty%2C+Lisa%22">Beatty, Lisa</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psycho-Oncology%22">Psycho-Oncology</searchLink>. May2026, Vol. 35 Issue 5, p1-6. 6p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cancer+survivors%22">Cancer survivors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Participatory+design%22">Participatory design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+health+services%22">Mental health services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Digital+technology%22">Digital technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Digital+health%22">Digital health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feasibility+studies%22">Feasibility studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-help+techniques%22">Self-help techniques</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Introduction: Healthy Living after Cancer (HLaC) was an evidence‐based, telephone‐delivered lifestyle program for survivors. HLaC Online was co‐designed with cancer survivors, healthcare professionals, and cancer support representatives to enhance sustainability and reach through a self‐directed digital format, while incorporating both physical health and mental health content. This study examined HLaC Online's feasibility. Methods: Eleven Australian post‐treatment cancer survivors participated in a 12‐week, single‐arm pilot with mixed‐methods evaluation. Feasibility indicators included uptake, usage, attrition, usability, satisfaction, and indicators of preliminary efficacy. Results: Of 318 website visitors, 11 enrolled, with nearly half never logging in. Module usage was limited (M = 3.3 of 9 modules) and only 5 completed follow‐up. Perceived usability of HLaC Online was varied (rated F− B+). Qualitative feedback highlighted the relevance of psychosocial modules, but engagement was hindered by technology barriers, cancer‐related symptoms, and lack of guidance. Participants suggested human support for orientation, accountability, and motivation. Conclusions: While HLaC Online was valued for its co‐designed mental health focus, feasibility was limited without guidance. Findings raise questions about which survivors can benefit from self‐directed digital programs versus those requiring human support. Future work should explore referral pathways, scalable human support models, and tailoring by need. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Psycho-Oncology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=194139531
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/pon.70486
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 6
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Cancer survivors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Participatory design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mental health services
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Digital technology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Digital health
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Feasibility studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self-help techniques
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Feasibility of a Co‐Designed Online Healthy Living Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Valuable Content, But Limited Engagement.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Leske, Morgan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Koczwara, Bogda
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Blunt, Jason
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Short, Camille E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Daly, Anthony
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Morris, Julia N.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Degner, Jon
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Beatty, Lisa
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10579249
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 35
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psycho-Oncology
              Type: main
ResultId 1