A double standard in evaluating implicit threats.
Saved in:
| Title: | A double standard in evaluating implicit threats. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Hynes, Madison (AUTHOR), Han, Tianshuang (AUTHOR), Snook, Brent (AUTHOR), Fallon, Laura (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Psychology, Crime & Law. Jun2026, Vol. 32 Issue 5, p727-747. 21p. |
| Subjects: | Double standard, Gang members, Police, Confession (Law), Decision making in law, Threats of violence, Justice administration |
| Abstract: | The perceived acceptability of implicit threats, as a function of messenger type, was examined. Across two experiments, participants (79 undergraduates and 160 community members) read a news article about how a police officer or gang member used an implicit threat to obtain an admission of wrongdoing from a store owner. Participants then provided their opinions about the implied messages, the messenger, and the admissibility of the confession evidence, and were asked to render a verdict. Results showed that the implied threats were viewed more negatively when uttered by a gang member. Ratings of admissibility of the confession evidence were high in both groups and varied little between the groups. Our findings are indicative of a double standard in the justice system whereby the same implicit message is viewed differently depending on who utters the message. The potential implications of these findings on legal decision-making and future research are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Psychology, Crime & Law is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 194165403 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A double standard in evaluating implicit threats. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hynes%2C+Madison%22">Hynes, Madison</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Han%2C+Tianshuang%22">Han, Tianshuang</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Snook%2C+Brent%22">Snook, Brent</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fallon%2C+Laura%22">Fallon, Laura</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychology%2C+Crime+%26+Law%22">Psychology, Crime & Law</searchLink>. Jun2026, Vol. 32 Issue 5, p727-747. 21p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Double+standard%22">Double standard</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gang+members%22">Gang members</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Police%22">Police</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confession+%28Law%29%22">Confession (Law)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making+in+law%22">Decision making in law</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Threats+of+violence%22">Threats of violence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Justice+administration%22">Justice administration</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The perceived acceptability of implicit threats, as a function of messenger type, was examined. Across two experiments, participants (79 undergraduates and 160 community members) read a news article about how a police officer or gang member used an implicit threat to obtain an admission of wrongdoing from a store owner. Participants then provided their opinions about the implied messages, the messenger, and the admissibility of the confession evidence, and were asked to render a verdict. Results showed that the implied threats were viewed more negatively when uttered by a gang member. Ratings of admissibility of the confession evidence were high in both groups and varied little between the groups. Our findings are indicative of a double standard in the justice system whereby the same implicit message is viewed differently depending on who utters the message. The potential implications of these findings on legal decision-making and future research are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Psychology, Crime & Law is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=194165403 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/1068316X.2024.2391398 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 21 StartPage: 727 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Double standard Type: general – SubjectFull: Gang members Type: general – SubjectFull: Police Type: general – SubjectFull: Confession (Law) Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision making in law Type: general – SubjectFull: Threats of violence Type: general – SubjectFull: Justice administration Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A double standard in evaluating implicit threats. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hynes, Madison – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Han, Tianshuang – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Snook, Brent – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fallon, Laura IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Jun2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1068316X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 32 – Type: issue Value: 5 Titles: – TitleFull: Psychology, Crime & Law Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
