The ordinary inadequacy of ‘conversational AI’.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The ordinary inadequacy of ‘conversational AI’.
Authors: Albert, Saul, Stokoe, Elizabeth
Source: Psychologist. Jun2026, p28-31. 4p.
Subjects: Language models, Conversation analysis, Emergency management, Emergency medical services, Chatbots, Communicative competence, ChatGPT
Abstract: This article examines how Large Language Models (LLMs) perform in emergency call interactions compared to human dispatchers, using conversation analysis (CA) to highlight key differences. It presents real and simulated emergency calls, including the well-known “pizza call,” where a caller covertly requests help, demonstrating that earlier LLMs failed to recognize such nuanced distress signals, while more recent versions like ChatGPT-4o show improved but imperfect understanding by relying on pattern matching from extensive training data rather than genuine interactional competence. The authors argue that LLMs lack the practical, moment-to-moment conversational skills essential for interpreting unique, context-dependent emergencies, emphasizing that despite advances, human dispatchers remain better equipped to handle the complexities of emergency communication. The article also critiques the common industry notion of “conversational AI” as overlooking the fundamental social mechanics of real conversation that LLMs cannot fully replicate. [Extracted from the article]
Copyright of Psychologist is the property of British Psychological Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 194211981
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Periodical
PubTypeId: serialPeriodical
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The ordinary inadequacy of ‘conversational AI’.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Albert%2C+Saul%22">Albert, Saul</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stokoe%2C+Elizabeth%22">Stokoe, Elizabeth</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychologist%22">Psychologist</searchLink>. Jun2026, p28-31. 4p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+models%22">Language models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conversation+analysis%22">Conversation analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Emergency+management%22">Emergency management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Emergency+medical+services%22">Emergency medical services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Chatbots%22">Chatbots</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communicative+competence%22">Communicative competence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22ChatGPT%22">ChatGPT</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This article examines how Large Language Models (LLMs) perform in emergency call interactions compared to human dispatchers, using conversation analysis (CA) to highlight key differences. It presents real and simulated emergency calls, including the well-known “pizza call,” where a caller covertly requests help, demonstrating that earlier LLMs failed to recognize such nuanced distress signals, while more recent versions like ChatGPT-4o show improved but imperfect understanding by relying on pattern matching from extensive training data rather than genuine interactional competence. The authors argue that LLMs lack the practical, moment-to-moment conversational skills essential for interpreting unique, context-dependent emergencies, emphasizing that despite advances, human dispatchers remain better equipped to handle the complexities of emergency communication. The article also critiques the common industry notion of “conversational AI” as overlooking the fundamental social mechanics of real conversation that LLMs cannot fully replicate. [Extracted from the article]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Psychologist is the property of British Psychological Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=194211981
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 4
        StartPage: 28
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Language models
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Conversation analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Emergency management
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Emergency medical services
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Chatbots
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Communicative competence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: ChatGPT
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The ordinary inadequacy of ‘conversational AI’.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Albert, Saul
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stokoe, Elizabeth
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09528229
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psychologist
              Type: main
ResultId 1