Dual-use research under scrutiny.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Dual-use research under scrutiny.
Authors: Kwon, Seokbeom (AUTHOR)
Source: Science. 6/4/2026, Vol. 392 Issue 6802, p1032-1035. 4p.
Subjects: National security, Security management, Policy analysis, Scientific discoveries, Security systems, University research
Geographic Terms: United States
Abstract: Recent US policy developments have tightened national security oversight of dual-use research (DUR)—research applicable to civilian purposes but posing potential security risks. Although DUR warrants oversight given its implications for national security, these regulatory changes prompt critical questions regarding the benefits and costs of strengthened security regimes (1, 2) from both science and national security governance standpoints. Restrictive measures risk delaying diffusion of crucial scientific discoveries, thereby necessitating assessment of whether tightening security oversight over DUR yields proportional security benefits. Research discussed below raises questions about the institutional effectiveness and broader implications of strengthened ex ante security measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Science is the property of American Association for the Advancement of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Recent US policy developments have tightened national security oversight of dual-use research (DUR)—research applicable to civilian purposes but posing potential security risks. Although DUR warrants oversight given its implications for national security, these regulatory changes prompt critical questions regarding the benefits and costs of strengthened security regimes (1, 2) from both science and national security governance standpoints. Restrictive measures risk delaying diffusion of crucial scientific discoveries, thereby necessitating assessment of whether tightening security oversight over DUR yields proportional security benefits. Research discussed below raises questions about the institutional effectiveness and broader implications of strengthened ex ante security measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00368075
DOI:10.1126/science.aee2479