Comparison of Discrete-Trial and Stimulus-Pairing Procedures in Computer-Assisted Language Learning.
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparison of Discrete-Trial and Stimulus-Pairing Procedures in Computer-Assisted Language Learning. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Smith, Carson J. (AUTHOR), Perry, Harrison (AUTHOR), Oliveira, Juliana S. C. D. (AUTHOR), Klassen, Sadie (AUTHOR), McGee, Reagan E. (AUTHOR), Petursdottir, Anna Ingeborg (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Behavioral Education. Jun2026, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p750-772. 23p. |
| Subjects: | Computer assisted language instruction, Teaching methods, Long-term memory, Lexicology, Foreign language education, Student engagement |
| Abstract: | Computer-assisted language learning applications vary in the extent to which they require active student responding. The present study compared acquisition and retention of vocabulary words taught under two instructional conditions. The discrete-trial condition required a typed student response after every instance of stimulus presentation and additionally employed fading of textual prompts. The stimulus pairing condition, by contrast, did not require any student responding except in probe trials (identical in both conditions). Participants were college students, and the instructional program targeted tacts in Experiment 1 (N = 9) and native-foreign intraverbals in Experiment 2 (N = 8). Instructional condition did not consistently affect correct responding in probes conducted throughout instruction. On average, however, participants made significantly more correct responses to discrete-trial than stimulus-pairing targets in a portion of immediate posttests and one-week follow-up tests for instructed and emergent responding. Effects on retention may have been partially obscured by differential retention of sets of instructional targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Behavioral Education is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 194697410 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Comparison of Discrete-Trial and Stimulus-Pairing Procedures in Computer-Assisted Language Learning. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Smith%2C+Carson+J%2E%22">Smith, Carson J.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Perry%2C+Harrison%22">Perry, Harrison</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Oliveira%2C+Juliana+S%2E+C%2E+D%2E%22">Oliveira, Juliana S. C. D.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Klassen%2C+Sadie%22">Klassen, Sadie</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McGee%2C+Reagan+E%2E%22">McGee, Reagan E.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Petursdottir%2C+Anna+Ingeborg%22">Petursdottir, Anna Ingeborg</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Behavioral+Education%22">Journal of Behavioral Education</searchLink>. Jun2026, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p750-772. 23p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+assisted+language+instruction%22">Computer assisted language instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+methods%22">Teaching methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Long-term+memory%22">Long-term memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lexicology%22">Lexicology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+language+education%22">Foreign language education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+engagement%22">Student engagement</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Computer-assisted language learning applications vary in the extent to which they require active student responding. The present study compared acquisition and retention of vocabulary words taught under two instructional conditions. The discrete-trial condition required a typed student response after every instance of stimulus presentation and additionally employed fading of textual prompts. The stimulus pairing condition, by contrast, did not require any student responding except in probe trials (identical in both conditions). Participants were college students, and the instructional program targeted tacts in Experiment 1 (N = 9) and native-foreign intraverbals in Experiment 2 (N = 8). Instructional condition did not consistently affect correct responding in probes conducted throughout instruction. On average, however, participants made significantly more correct responses to discrete-trial than stimulus-pairing targets in a portion of immediate posttests and one-week follow-up tests for instructed and emergent responding. Effects on retention may have been partially obscured by differential retention of sets of instructional targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Behavioral Education is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=194697410 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10864-026-09621-2 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 23 StartPage: 750 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Computer assisted language instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Long-term memory Type: general – SubjectFull: Lexicology Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign language education Type: general – SubjectFull: Student engagement Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Comparison of Discrete-Trial and Stimulus-Pairing Procedures in Computer-Assisted Language Learning. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Smith, Carson J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Perry, Harrison – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Oliveira, Juliana S. C. D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Klassen, Sadie – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: McGee, Reagan E. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Petursdottir, Anna Ingeborg IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Jun2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 10530819 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 35 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Behavioral Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
