View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Recruitment Mode Selectivity and Interview Mode Measurement Effects in a Population‐Based Assessment of Cognitive Performance.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Recruitment Mode Selectivity and Interview Mode Measurement Effects in a Population‐Based Assessment of Cognitive Performance.
Authors: Hartman, Nicholas (AUTHOR), Briceño, Emily M. (AUTHOR), Mehdipanah, Roshanak (AUTHOR), Chang, Wen (AUTHOR), Levine, Deborah A. (AUTHOR), Garcia, Nelda (AUTHOR), Gonzales, Xavier F. (AUTHOR), Langa, Kenneth M. (AUTHOR), Zahuranec, Darin B. (AUTHOR), Morgenstern, Lewis B. (AUTHOR), Heeringa, Steven G. (AUTHOR)
Source: International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. Jun2026, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p1-10. 10p.
Subjects: Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Cognitive testing, Acquisition of data, Epidemiological research, Cognitive ability
Abstract: Objectives: Using data from the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi—Cognitive (BASIC‐C) study, we investigate recruitment mode selection effects and interview mode measurement effects in population‐based applications of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP). Methods: We compared participant demographics across in‐person (n = 1212), telephone (n = 645), and community (n = 363) samples recruited over 2018–2023 to American Community Survey statistics for Nueces County, Texas. We then implemented unadjusted and adjusted models to assess differences in harmonized MoCA scores, HCAP eligibility and completion, and HCAP cognitive domain measures across recruitment and interview modes. Results: The samples had significantly different levels of selection effects, with significant differences in the odds of HCAP eligibility (Odds Ratios (ORs) of 0.51, 1.32, p‐value < 0.001). The in‐person and telephone interview modes showed significant differences in the cumulative odds of harmonized MoCA score categories (Cumulative OR = 1.58, p‐value < 0.001) and several HCAP domain scores, and these differences were attenuated but not eliminated after adjusting for participant demographics. Conclusions: The observed differences in MoCA screening outcomes and HCAP eligibility and cognitive domain scores were largely attributable to recruitment mode selection effects. However, statistical adjustments for population characteristics did not fully attenuate interview mode measurement effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 194812911
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Recruitment Mode Selectivity and Interview Mode Measurement Effects in a Population‐Based Assessment of Cognitive Performance.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Hartman%2C+Nicholas%22&quot;&gt;Hartman, Nicholas&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Brice&#241;o%2C+Emily+M%2E%22&quot;&gt;Brice&#241;o, Emily M.&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Mehdipanah%2C+Roshanak%22&quot;&gt;Mehdipanah, Roshanak&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Chang%2C+Wen%22&quot;&gt;Chang, Wen&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Levine%2C+Deborah+A%2E%22&quot;&gt;Levine, Deborah A.&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Garcia%2C+Nelda%22&quot;&gt;Garcia, Nelda&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Gonzales%2C+Xavier+F%2E%22&quot;&gt;Gonzales, Xavier F.&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Langa%2C+Kenneth+M%2E%22&quot;&gt;Langa, Kenneth M.&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Zahuranec%2C+Darin+B%2E%22&quot;&gt;Zahuranec, Darin B.&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Morgenstern%2C+Lewis+B%2E%22&quot;&gt;Morgenstern, Lewis B.&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Heeringa%2C+Steven+G%2E%22&quot;&gt;Heeringa, Steven G.&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22International+Journal+of+Methods+in+Psychiatric+Research%22&quot;&gt;International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Jun2026, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p1-10. 10p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Montreal+Cognitive+Assessment%22&quot;&gt;Montreal Cognitive Assessment&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Cognitive+testing%22&quot;&gt;Cognitive testing&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Acquisition+of+data%22&quot;&gt;Acquisition of data&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Epidemiological+research%22&quot;&gt;Epidemiological research&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Cognitive+ability%22&quot;&gt;Cognitive ability&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objectives: Using data from the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi—Cognitive (BASIC‐C) study, we investigate recruitment mode selection effects and interview mode measurement effects in population‐based applications of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP). Methods: We compared participant demographics across in‐person (n = 1212), telephone (n = 645), and community (n = 363) samples recruited over 2018–2023 to American Community Survey statistics for Nueces County, Texas. We then implemented unadjusted and adjusted models to assess differences in harmonized MoCA scores, HCAP eligibility and completion, and HCAP cognitive domain measures across recruitment and interview modes. Results: The samples had significantly different levels of selection effects, with significant differences in the odds of HCAP eligibility (Odds Ratios (ORs) of 0.51, 1.32, p‐value &lt; 0.001). The in‐person and telephone interview modes showed significant differences in the cumulative odds of harmonized MoCA score categories (Cumulative OR = 1.58, p‐value &lt; 0.001) and several HCAP domain scores, and these differences were attenuated but not eliminated after adjusting for participant demographics. Conclusions: The observed differences in MoCA screening outcomes and HCAP eligibility and cognitive domain scores were largely attributable to recruitment mode selection effects. However, statistical adjustments for population characteristics did not fully attenuate interview mode measurement effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=194812911
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/mpr.70087
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Montreal Cognitive Assessment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Acquisition of data
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Epidemiological research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive ability
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Recruitment Mode Selectivity and Interview Mode Measurement Effects in a Population‐Based Assessment of Cognitive Performance.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hartman, Nicholas
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Briceño, Emily M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mehdipanah, Roshanak
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chang, Wen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Levine, Deborah A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Garcia, Nelda
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gonzales, Xavier F.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Langa, Kenneth M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zahuranec, Darin B.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Morgenstern, Lewis B.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Heeringa, Steven G.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10498931
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 35
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1