View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and translation potential of transdisciplinary assessment models: a mixed methods study to understand perspectives of Australian healthcare professionals.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and translation potential of transdisciplinary assessment models: a mixed methods study to understand perspectives of Australian healthcare professionals.
Authors: Martin, Aleysha K. (AUTHOR), Green, Theresa L. (AUTHOR), McCarthy, Alexandra L. (AUTHOR), Sowa, P. Marcin (AUTHOR), Laakso, E-Liisa (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Interprofessional Care. Jul/Aug2026, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p641-651. 11p.
Subjects: Stroke treatment, Cross-sectional method, Interprofessional relations, Human services programs, Research funding, Focus groups, Statistical sampling, Questionnaires, Content analysis, Health, Descriptive statistics, Information resources, Thematic analysis, Attitudes of medical personnel, Research methodology, Trust, Medical needs assessment, Needs assessment, Change management, Health care teams, Professional competence, Medical practice
Geographic Terms: Australia
Abstract: Transdisciplinary practice extends interprofessional collaboration by integrating and transcending disciplinary boundaries. Transdisciplinary models can reorganize health professionals' practice scope and optimize work practices. Previous transdisciplinary model evaluations have focused on clinical outcomes rather than implementation outcomes and translation potential. We aimed to understand the acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and translation potential of a transdisciplinary stroke assessment. An explanatory sequential design was used in this cross-sectional mixed-methods study. Australian healthcare professionals (N = 180) completed an online survey of three validated measures (Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, and Feasibility Intervention Measure). Online focus group participants (N = 21, subgroup of survey participants) discussed survey results and implementation of the transdisciplinary stroke assessment in their workplace. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Most participants agreed or completely agreed that the transdisciplinary stroke assessment was acceptable (70%), appropriate (62%), and feasible (66%). Seven themes (competence, buy-in & support, evaluation, information, change management, interprofessional trust, and resources) described what participants identified as essential factors to support transdisciplinary assessment implementation. The results provided novel information on translating transdisciplinary models in interprofessional settings, including strategies to improve acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility, and how to support healthcare professionals undertaking the work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Interprofessional Care is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 194842534
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and translation potential of transdisciplinary assessment models: a mixed methods study to understand perspectives of Australian healthcare professionals.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Martin%2C+Aleysha+K%2E%22">Martin, Aleysha K.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Green%2C+Theresa+L%2E%22">Green, Theresa L.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McCarthy%2C+Alexandra+L%2E%22">McCarthy, Alexandra L.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sowa%2C+P%2E+Marcin%22">Sowa, P. Marcin</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Laakso%2C+E-Liisa%22">Laakso, E-Liisa</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Interprofessional+Care%22">Journal of Interprofessional Care</searchLink>. Jul/Aug2026, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p641-651. 11p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stroke+treatment%22">Stroke treatment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cross-sectional+method%22">Cross-sectional method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interprofessional+relations%22">Interprofessional relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+services+programs%22">Human services programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Focus+groups%22">Focus groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+sampling%22">Statistical sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Content+analysis%22">Content analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health%22">Health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+resources%22">Information resources</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitudes+of+medical+personnel%22">Attitudes of medical personnel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Trust%22">Trust</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+needs+assessment%22">Medical needs assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Needs+assessment%22">Needs assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Change+management%22">Change management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+care+teams%22">Health care teams</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+competence%22">Professional competence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+practice%22">Medical practice</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Transdisciplinary practice extends interprofessional collaboration by integrating and transcending disciplinary boundaries. Transdisciplinary models can reorganize health professionals' practice scope and optimize work practices. Previous transdisciplinary model evaluations have focused on clinical outcomes rather than implementation outcomes and translation potential. We aimed to understand the acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and translation potential of a transdisciplinary stroke assessment. An explanatory sequential design was used in this cross-sectional mixed-methods study. Australian healthcare professionals (N = 180) completed an online survey of three validated measures (Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, and Feasibility Intervention Measure). Online focus group participants (N = 21, subgroup of survey participants) discussed survey results and implementation of the transdisciplinary stroke assessment in their workplace. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Most participants agreed or completely agreed that the transdisciplinary stroke assessment was acceptable (70%), appropriate (62%), and feasible (66%). Seven themes (competence, buy-in & support, evaluation, information, change management, interprofessional trust, and resources) described what participants identified as essential factors to support transdisciplinary assessment implementation. The results provided novel information on translating transdisciplinary models in interprofessional settings, including strategies to improve acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility, and how to support healthcare professionals undertaking the work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Interprofessional Care is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=194842534
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/13561820.2026.2647248
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 641
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Stroke treatment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cross-sectional method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interprofessional relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Human services programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Focus groups
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical sampling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Questionnaires
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Content analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Information resources
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Attitudes of medical personnel
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Trust
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical needs assessment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Needs assessment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Change management
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health care teams
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Professional competence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical practice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Australia
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and translation potential of transdisciplinary assessment models: a mixed methods study to understand perspectives of Australian healthcare professionals.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Martin, Aleysha K.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Green, Theresa L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: McCarthy, Alexandra L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sowa, P. Marcin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Laakso, E-Liisa
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul/Aug2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 13561820
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 40
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Interprofessional Care
              Type: main
ResultId 1