View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Psychometric evaluation of the four-factor Korean version of the Care process self-evaluation tool.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Psychometric evaluation of the four-factor Korean version of the Care process self-evaluation tool.
Authors: Hwang, Jee-In (AUTHOR), Claessens, Fien (AUTHOR), Choi, Miyoung (AUTHOR), Park, Eunjung (AUTHOR), Vanhaecht, Kris (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Interprofessional Care. Jul/Aug2026, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p697-707. 11p.
Subjects: Cross-sectional method, Scale analysis (Psychology), Pearson correlation (Statistics), Teams in the workplace, Research funding, Cronbach's alpha, Interprofessional relations, Research evaluation, Research methodology evaluation, Questionnaires, Evaluation of medical care, Hospitals, Descriptive statistics, Surveys, Psychometrics, Research methodology, Communication, Data analysis software, Factor analysis, Health care teams, Discriminant analysis, Evaluation
Geographic Terms: South Korea
Abstract: Organizing collaborative care in hospitals can increase healthcare quality and patient safety. As a validated instrument, the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET) has been internationally utilized to measure the quality of care process organization from the perspective of interprofessional teams. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the modified four-factor CPSET with cultural adaptation. Cross-sectional survey design was employed with 350 healthcare professionals (208 in 2016 and 142 in 2024) to assess construct validity through confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), convergent, and discriminant validity with average variance extracted, composite reliability, and interfactor correlations, and concurrent validity by Pearson's correlation between CPSET and Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (TPQ) scores. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. In total, 345 participants completed the Korean CPSET. CFA showed acceptable fit (SRMR = 0.061 and CFI = 0.926), except for the RMSEA showing mediocre fit (RMSEA = 0.091). Convergent and discriminant validity was supported. Significant correlation was found between CPSET and TPQ scores (r = 0.67, p < 0.001). Cronbach's alpha of the scale was 0.98. The findings indicate that the Korean CPSET is valid and reliable, making it a valuable tool to assess the quality of collaborative care organization and guide quality improvement efforts in Korean hospitals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Interprofessional Care is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 194842538
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Psychometric evaluation of the four-factor Korean version of the Care process self-evaluation tool.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Hwang%2C+Jee-In%22&quot;&gt;Hwang, Jee-In&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Claessens%2C+Fien%22&quot;&gt;Claessens, Fien&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Choi%2C+Miyoung%22&quot;&gt;Choi, Miyoung&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Park%2C+Eunjung%22&quot;&gt;Park, Eunjung&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Vanhaecht%2C+Kris%22&quot;&gt;Vanhaecht, Kris&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Journal+of+Interprofessional+Care%22&quot;&gt;Journal of Interprofessional Care&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Jul/Aug2026, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p697-707. 11p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Cross-sectional+method%22&quot;&gt;Cross-sectional method&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Scale+analysis+%28Psychology%29%22&quot;&gt;Scale analysis (Psychology)&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Pearson+correlation+%28Statistics%29%22&quot;&gt;Pearson correlation (Statistics)&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Teams+in+the+workplace%22&quot;&gt;Teams in the workplace&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research+funding%22&quot;&gt;Research funding&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Cronbach&#39;s+alpha%22&quot;&gt;Cronbach&#39;s alpha&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Interprofessional+relations%22&quot;&gt;Interprofessional relations&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research+evaluation%22&quot;&gt;Research evaluation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research+methodology+evaluation%22&quot;&gt;Research methodology evaluation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Questionnaires%22&quot;&gt;Questionnaires&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Evaluation+of+medical+care%22&quot;&gt;Evaluation of medical care&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Hospitals%22&quot;&gt;Hospitals&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Descriptive+statistics%22&quot;&gt;Descriptive statistics&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Surveys%22&quot;&gt;Surveys&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Psychometrics%22&quot;&gt;Psychometrics&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research+methodology%22&quot;&gt;Research methodology&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Communication%22&quot;&gt;Communication&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Data+analysis+software%22&quot;&gt;Data analysis software&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Factor+analysis%22&quot;&gt;Factor analysis&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Health+care+teams%22&quot;&gt;Health care teams&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Discriminant+analysis%22&quot;&gt;Discriminant analysis&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Evaluation%22&quot;&gt;Evaluation&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22South+Korea%22&quot;&gt;South Korea&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Organizing collaborative care in hospitals can increase healthcare quality and patient safety. As a validated instrument, the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET) has been internationally utilized to measure the quality of care process organization from the perspective of interprofessional teams. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the modified four-factor CPSET with cultural adaptation. Cross-sectional survey design was employed with 350 healthcare professionals (208 in 2016 and 142 in 2024) to assess construct validity through confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), convergent, and discriminant validity with average variance extracted, composite reliability, and interfactor correlations, and concurrent validity by Pearson&#39;s correlation between CPSET and Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (TPQ) scores. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach&#39;s alpha. In total, 345 participants completed the Korean CPSET. CFA showed acceptable fit (SRMR = 0.061 and CFI = 0.926), except for the RMSEA showing mediocre fit (RMSEA = 0.091). Convergent and discriminant validity was supported. Significant correlation was found between CPSET and TPQ scores (r = 0.67, p &lt; 0.001). Cronbach&#39;s alpha of the scale was 0.98. The findings indicate that the Korean CPSET is valid and reliable, making it a valuable tool to assess the quality of collaborative care organization and guide quality improvement efforts in Korean hospitals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Journal of Interprofessional Care is the property of Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=194842538
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/13561820.2026.2652498
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 697
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Cross-sectional method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scale analysis (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pearson correlation (Statistics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teams in the workplace
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cronbach's alpha
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interprofessional relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Questionnaires
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation of medical care
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hospitals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Surveys
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychometrics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Factor analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health care teams
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Discriminant analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: South Korea
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Psychometric evaluation of the four-factor Korean version of the Care process self-evaluation tool.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hwang, Jee-In
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Claessens, Fien
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Choi, Miyoung
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Park, Eunjung
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Vanhaecht, Kris
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul/Aug2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 13561820
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 40
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Interprofessional Care
              Type: main
ResultId 1