Against omission bias: Adolescents prefer commissions in vaccination decision‐making.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Against omission bias: Adolescents prefer commissions in vaccination decision‐making.
Authors: Wang, Yanwei (AUTHOR), Shi, Zonghua (AUTHOR), Li, Jiatai (AUTHOR), Su, Yanjie (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Research on Adolescence (Wiley-Blackwell). Jun2026, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p1-10. 10p.
Subjects: Decision making, Cognitive bias, Social interaction, Drift diffusion models, Risk-taking behavior, Teenagers, Vaccination policies
Abstract: People prefer choosing omission rather than commission when the risks of negative outcomes are similar, which is known as omission bias. While adults exhibit omission bias in various contexts, whether adolescents exhibit omission bias in decision‐making remains a matter of debate. The present study examined the choice between commission and omission of early‐to‐middle adolescents (n = 123) and young adults (n = 131) in a classic vaccination decision‐making context. The results revealed that adolescents were more inclined to commission, especially when the risks of negative outcomes for both choices were equal. Drift diffusion model analysis revealed that compared to young adults, adolescents had a similar drift rate but a much lower threshold separation. These findings suggest that adolescents had a preference for commission in decision‐making, which might motivate adolescents to engage in positive risk‐taking and gain social experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Research on Adolescence (Wiley-Blackwell) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 194869976
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Against omission bias: Adolescents prefer commissions in vaccination decision‐making.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Yanwei%22">Wang, Yanwei</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shi%2C+Zonghua%22">Shi, Zonghua</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Li%2C+Jiatai%22">Li, Jiatai</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Su%2C+Yanjie%22">Su, Yanjie</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Research+on+Adolescence+%28Wiley-Blackwell%29%22">Journal of Research on Adolescence (Wiley-Blackwell)</searchLink>. Jun2026, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p1-10. 10p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making%22">Decision making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+bias%22">Cognitive bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+interaction%22">Social interaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Drift+diffusion+models%22">Drift diffusion models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Risk-taking+behavior%22">Risk-taking behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teenagers%22">Teenagers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vaccination+policies%22">Vaccination policies</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: People prefer choosing omission rather than commission when the risks of negative outcomes are similar, which is known as omission bias. While adults exhibit omission bias in various contexts, whether adolescents exhibit omission bias in decision‐making remains a matter of debate. The present study examined the choice between commission and omission of early‐to‐middle adolescents (n = 123) and young adults (n = 131) in a classic vaccination decision‐making context. The results revealed that adolescents were more inclined to commission, especially when the risks of negative outcomes for both choices were equal. Drift diffusion model analysis revealed that compared to young adults, adolescents had a similar drift rate but a much lower threshold separation. These findings suggest that adolescents had a preference for commission in decision‐making, which might motivate adolescents to engage in positive risk‐taking and gain social experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Research on Adolescence (Wiley-Blackwell) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=194869976
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/jora.70218
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Decision making
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive bias
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social interaction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Drift diffusion models
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Risk-taking behavior
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teenagers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Vaccination policies
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Against omission bias: Adolescents prefer commissions in vaccination decision‐making.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wang, Yanwei
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shi, Zonghua
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Li, Jiatai
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Su, Yanjie
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10508392
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 36
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Research on Adolescence (Wiley-Blackwell)
              Type: main
ResultId 1