Morphogenesis in Complex Adaptive Sociocultural Systems: Before and After Archer.
Saved in:
| Title: | Morphogenesis in Complex Adaptive Sociocultural Systems: Before and After Archer. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Crossley, Nick (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. Jun2026, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p1-10. 10p. |
| Subjects: | Structuration theory, Giddens, Anthony, 1938-, Systems theory, Sociocultural factors, Social theory, Sociologists |
| Abstract: | Margaret Archer's widely cited work on the structure/agency problem draws upon the concept of 'morphogenesis', which she borrows (with full acknowledgement) from Walter Buckley's theory of complex adaptive sociocultural systems. In this paper, I revisit Buckley's original formulation and argue that it is both different from and better than Archer's later version (though she makes an interesting methodological contribution to it). Archer's version is shaped by her desire to avoid 'conflating' structures and agents, as she believes Anthony Giddens' structuration theory does. It is sometimes appropriate to draw an analytic distinction between structures and actors, as she suggests and as Giddens himself occasionally does, but she goes beyond this in practice, arguing for a more substantial distinction different to cannot be defended. Buckley rightly rejects any such substantial distinction. His position is closer to Giddens' in this respect. However, his approach differs significantly from that of Giddens too, avoiding the problems that Archer identifies with structuration theory. Buckley thus affords a preferable alternative to both Archer and Giddens, a middle path that combines the strengths and avoids the weaknesses of their respective approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 194916291 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Morphogenesis in Complex Adaptive Sociocultural Systems: Before and After Archer. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Crossley%2C+Nick%22">Crossley, Nick</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+for+the+Theory+of+Social+Behaviour%22">Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour</searchLink>. Jun2026, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p1-10. 10p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Structuration+theory%22">Structuration theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Giddens%2C+Anthony%2C+1938-%22">Giddens, Anthony, 1938-</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systems+theory%22">Systems theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sociocultural+factors%22">Sociocultural factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+theory%22">Social theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sociologists%22">Sociologists</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Margaret Archer's widely cited work on the structure/agency problem draws upon the concept of 'morphogenesis', which she borrows (with full acknowledgement) from Walter Buckley's theory of complex adaptive sociocultural systems. In this paper, I revisit Buckley's original formulation and argue that it is both different from and better than Archer's later version (though she makes an interesting methodological contribution to it). Archer's version is shaped by her desire to avoid 'conflating' structures and agents, as she believes Anthony Giddens' structuration theory does. It is sometimes appropriate to draw an analytic distinction between structures and actors, as she suggests and as Giddens himself occasionally does, but she goes beyond this in practice, arguing for a more substantial distinction different to cannot be defended. Buckley rightly rejects any such substantial distinction. His position is closer to Giddens' in this respect. However, his approach differs significantly from that of Giddens too, avoiding the problems that Archer identifies with structuration theory. Buckley thus affords a preferable alternative to both Archer and Giddens, a middle path that combines the strengths and avoids the weaknesses of their respective approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=194916291 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/jtsb.70045 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 10 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Structuration theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Giddens, Anthony, 1938- Type: general – SubjectFull: Systems theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Sociocultural factors Type: general – SubjectFull: Social theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Sociologists Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Morphogenesis in Complex Adaptive Sociocultural Systems: Before and After Archer. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Crossley, Nick IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Jun2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00218308 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 56 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |