Is walking enough to promote health benefits in older adults? A systematic review.
Saved in:
| Title: | Is walking enough to promote health benefits in older adults? A systematic review. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | de la Casa-Pérez, Ana (AUTHOR), Conceição, Filipe Almeida Viana da (AUTHOR), Párraga-Montilla, Juan Antonio (AUTHOR), Cabrera-Linares, José Carlos (AUTHOR), Latorre-Román, Pedro Ángel (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Educational Gerontology. Jul2026, Vol. 52 Issue 7, p669-698. 30p. |
| Subjects: | Cognitive testing, Research funding, Executive function, Descriptive statistics, Walking, Systematic reviews, MEDLINE, Muscle strength, Physical fitness, Health behavior, Aerobic exercises, Quality of life, Health outcome assessment, Health promotion, Online information services, Data analysis software, Physical activity, Psychology information storage & retrieval systems, Physical mobility, Postural balance, Cognitive flexibility, Time, Mental depression |
| Abstract: | This systematic review aimed to analyze the effects of walking training interventions – compared to no intervention or alternative physical activity programs – on physical fitness, cognitive function, and psychosocial outcomes in healthy older adults. The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024499332). We included randomized and non-randomized controlled trials published between January 2015 and February 2025. Eligible studies included adults aged ≥ 60 years, without major comorbidities, who participated in walking interventions as the primary activity, with passive or active control groups, and assessed outcomes in physical (e.g. strength, balance), cognitive (e.g. executive function), or psychosocial (e.g. quality of life) domains. Searches across four electronic databases yielded 18 eligible studies involving 1,174 participants. Walking interventions – particularly dual-task and structured aerobic formats – consistently demonstrated statistically significant improvements in mobility, strength, and executive function. Continuous and interval walking protocols produced moderate improvements, while multicomponent and cognitively enriched walking interventions showed larger effects, especially in balance and cognitive flexibility. Psychosocial outcomes showed smaller and more variable effects, possibly due to differences in intervention duration, intensity, or measurement tools. Limited impact was found on depressive symptoms, and results on quality of life were mixed. In conclusion, walking-based programs are effective for improving physical and cognitive health in older adults, especially when performed at moderate-to-vigorous intensity, at least three times per week, and over ≥12 weeks. Programs incorporating dual-task or cognitive components appear especially beneficial. Further high-quality research is needed to clarify psychosocial effects and optimize intervention characteristics such as intensity, frequency, and duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Educational Gerontology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 194999696 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Is walking enough to promote health benefits in older adults? A systematic review. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22de+la+Casa-Pérez%2C+Ana%22">de la Casa-Pérez, Ana</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Conceição%2C+Filipe+Almeida+Viana+da%22">Conceição, Filipe Almeida Viana da</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Párraga-Montilla%2C+Juan+Antonio%22">Párraga-Montilla, Juan Antonio</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cabrera-Linares%2C+José+Carlos%22">Cabrera-Linares, José Carlos</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Latorre-Román%2C+Pedro+Ángel%22">Latorre-Román, Pedro Ángel</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Educational+Gerontology%22">Educational Gerontology</searchLink>. Jul2026, Vol. 52 Issue 7, p669-698. 30p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+testing%22">Cognitive testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Executive+function%22">Executive function</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Walking%22">Walking</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDLINE%22">MEDLINE</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Muscle+strength%22">Muscle strength</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physical+fitness%22">Physical fitness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+behavior%22">Health behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Aerobic+exercises%22">Aerobic exercises</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quality+of+life%22">Quality of life</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+outcome+assessment%22">Health outcome assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+promotion%22">Health promotion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Online+information+services%22">Online information services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physical+activity%22">Physical activity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Psychology information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physical+mobility%22">Physical mobility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Postural+balance%22">Postural balance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+flexibility%22">Cognitive flexibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Time%22">Time</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+depression%22">Mental depression</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This systematic review aimed to analyze the effects of walking training interventions – compared to no intervention or alternative physical activity programs – on physical fitness, cognitive function, and psychosocial outcomes in healthy older adults. The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024499332). We included randomized and non-randomized controlled trials published between January 2015 and February 2025. Eligible studies included adults aged ≥ 60 years, without major comorbidities, who participated in walking interventions as the primary activity, with passive or active control groups, and assessed outcomes in physical (e.g. strength, balance), cognitive (e.g. executive function), or psychosocial (e.g. quality of life) domains. Searches across four electronic databases yielded 18 eligible studies involving 1,174 participants. Walking interventions – particularly dual-task and structured aerobic formats – consistently demonstrated statistically significant improvements in mobility, strength, and executive function. Continuous and interval walking protocols produced moderate improvements, while multicomponent and cognitively enriched walking interventions showed larger effects, especially in balance and cognitive flexibility. Psychosocial outcomes showed smaller and more variable effects, possibly due to differences in intervention duration, intensity, or measurement tools. Limited impact was found on depressive symptoms, and results on quality of life were mixed. In conclusion, walking-based programs are effective for improving physical and cognitive health in older adults, especially when performed at moderate-to-vigorous intensity, at least three times per week, and over ≥12 weeks. Programs incorporating dual-task or cognitive components appear especially beneficial. Further high-quality research is needed to clarify psychosocial effects and optimize intervention characteristics such as intensity, frequency, and duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Educational Gerontology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=194999696 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/03601277.2025.2515559 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 30 StartPage: 669 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Cognitive testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: Executive function Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Walking Type: general – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews Type: general – SubjectFull: MEDLINE Type: general – SubjectFull: Muscle strength Type: general – SubjectFull: Physical fitness Type: general – SubjectFull: Health behavior Type: general – SubjectFull: Aerobic exercises Type: general – SubjectFull: Quality of life Type: general – SubjectFull: Health outcome assessment Type: general – SubjectFull: Health promotion Type: general – SubjectFull: Online information services Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis software Type: general – SubjectFull: Physical activity Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychology information storage & retrieval systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Physical mobility Type: general – SubjectFull: Postural balance Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive flexibility Type: general – SubjectFull: Time Type: general – SubjectFull: Mental depression Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Is walking enough to promote health benefits in older adults? A systematic review. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: de la Casa-Pérez, Ana – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Conceição, Filipe Almeida Viana da – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Párraga-Montilla, Juan Antonio – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cabrera-Linares, José Carlos – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Latorre-Román, Pedro Ángel IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Text: Jul2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 03601277 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 52 – Type: issue Value: 7 Titles: – TitleFull: Educational Gerontology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |