Prediction of fatal and non-fatal suicide attempts by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS): systematic review and meta-analysis.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Prediction of fatal and non-fatal suicide attempts by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS): systematic review and meta-analysis.
Authors: Daray, Federico Manuel (AUTHOR), Grendas, Leando Nicolás (AUTHOR), Neupane, Sudan Prasad (AUTHOR), Chiapella, Luciana Carla (AUTHOR), Fisher, Prudence W. (AUTHOR), Gould, Madelyn S. (AUTHOR), Posner, Kelly (AUTHOR), Galfalvy, Hanga (AUTHOR), Jaffe, Chaya (AUTHOR), Mann, J. John (AUTHOR)
Source: British Journal of Psychiatry. Aug2026, Vol. 229 Issue 2, p218-231. 14p.
Abstract: Background: The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a predominant tool for screening and scoring suicidal ideation and behaviour to identify individuals at risk. No meta-analysis has examined its predictive significance. Aims: To evaluate the C-SSRS assessment of suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviour as predictors of future fatal and non-fatal suicide attempts. Method: A systematic search of Medline, PsycInfo, Embase, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments databases was conducted from January 2008 to February 2024. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022361944). Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Pooled odds ratios were calculated using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed with the I 2 statistic. Publication bias was evaluated with Egger's test and funnel plots. Results: The search identified 1071 unique records, of which 28 studies met inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis included 27 studies with independent samples. Suicidal behaviour (pooled odds ratio 3.14, 95% CI 1.86–5.31) and suicide attempts (pooled odds ratio 2.78, 95% CI 1.82–4.24) were predictors of future non-fatal suicide attempts. Suicidal ideation severity (odds ratio 1.46/point, 95% CI 1.28–1.77) was a stronger predictor of future non-fatal suicide attempts than suicideal ideation intensity (odds ratio 1.11/point, 95% CI 1.04–1.18). Two studies linked higher suicidal ideation severity and a history of suicidal behaviour with an increased risk of fatal suicide attempts, though meta-analysis was not feasible for only two studies. Conclusions: Suicidal behaviour, suicide attempts and to a lesser extent suicidal ideation, identified using the C-SSRS, predicted future non-fatal suicide attempts. These findings support the use of the C-SSRS to detect individuals at higher-risk requiring enhanced preventive interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of British Journal of Psychiatry is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 195793638
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Prediction of fatal and non-fatal suicide attempts by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS): systematic review and meta-analysis.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Daray%2C+Federico+Manuel%22">Daray, Federico Manuel</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Grendas%2C+Leando+Nicolás%22">Grendas, Leando Nicolás</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Neupane%2C+Sudan+Prasad%22">Neupane, Sudan Prasad</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chiapella%2C+Luciana+Carla%22">Chiapella, Luciana Carla</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fisher%2C+Prudence+W%2E%22">Fisher, Prudence W.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gould%2C+Madelyn+S%2E%22">Gould, Madelyn S.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Posner%2C+Kelly%22">Posner, Kelly</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Galfalvy%2C+Hanga%22">Galfalvy, Hanga</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jaffe%2C+Chaya%22">Jaffe, Chaya</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mann%2C+J%2E+John%22">Mann, J. John</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22British+Journal+of+Psychiatry%22">British Journal of Psychiatry</searchLink>. Aug2026, Vol. 229 Issue 2, p218-231. 14p.
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a predominant tool for screening and scoring suicidal ideation and behaviour to identify individuals at risk. No meta-analysis has examined its predictive significance. Aims: To evaluate the C-SSRS assessment of suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviour as predictors of future fatal and non-fatal suicide attempts. Method: A systematic search of Medline, PsycInfo, Embase, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments databases was conducted from January 2008 to February 2024. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022361944). Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Pooled odds ratios were calculated using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed with the I 2 statistic. Publication bias was evaluated with Egger's test and funnel plots. Results: The search identified 1071 unique records, of which 28 studies met inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis included 27 studies with independent samples. Suicidal behaviour (pooled odds ratio 3.14, 95% CI 1.86–5.31) and suicide attempts (pooled odds ratio 2.78, 95% CI 1.82–4.24) were predictors of future non-fatal suicide attempts. Suicidal ideation severity (odds ratio 1.46/point, 95% CI 1.28–1.77) was a stronger predictor of future non-fatal suicide attempts than suicideal ideation intensity (odds ratio 1.11/point, 95% CI 1.04–1.18). Two studies linked higher suicidal ideation severity and a history of suicidal behaviour with an increased risk of fatal suicide attempts, though meta-analysis was not feasible for only two studies. Conclusions: Suicidal behaviour, suicide attempts and to a lesser extent suicidal ideation, identified using the C-SSRS, predicted future non-fatal suicide attempts. These findings support the use of the C-SSRS to detect individuals at higher-risk requiring enhanced preventive interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of British Journal of Psychiatry is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=195793638
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1192/bjp.2025.10316
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
        StartPage: 218
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Prediction of fatal and non-fatal suicide attempts by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS): systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Daray, Federico Manuel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Grendas, Leando Nicolás
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Neupane, Sudan Prasad
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chiapella, Luciana Carla
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fisher, Prudence W.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gould, Madelyn S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Posner, Kelly
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Galfalvy, Hanga
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jaffe, Chaya
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mann, J. John
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00071250
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 229
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: British Journal of Psychiatry
              Type: main
ResultId 1