Physical Activity and Sport Interventions to Prevent Drug Use: A Systematic Review Including Different Intervention Paradigms.
Saved in:
| Title: | Physical Activity and Sport Interventions to Prevent Drug Use: A Systematic Review Including Different Intervention Paradigms. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Asensio-Hernández, Marcos (AUTHOR), Jiménez-Martín, Pedro Jesús (AUTHOR), Jiménez-Martín, Antonio (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Substance Use & Misuse. 2026, Vol. 61 Issue 11, p1855-1873. 19p. |
| Subjects: | Substance abuse risk factors, Substance abuse prevention, Human services programs, Research funding, Alcoholic beverages, Tobacco, Peer pressure, Substance abuse treatment, Evaluation of human services programs, Affinity groups, Descriptive statistics, Families, Sports participation, Systematic reviews, MEDLINE, Yoga, Teenagers' conduct of life, Social context, Intention, Physical fitness, Treatment programs, Online information services, Confidence intervals, Cannabis (Genus), Family support, Social support, Health education, Physical activity, ERIC (Information retrieval system), Drugs of abuse, Adolescence |
| Abstract: | Background: Sport and physical activity are increasingly used in adolescent substance use prevention, but interventions differ substantially in how sport is integrated. This systematic review examined preventive effects according to physical activity implementation paradigm. Methods: Five databases and prior reviews were searched. Interventions were classified into three paradigms: Preventive Sport (PS), where sport alone is expected to prevent use; Prevention Combined with Sport (PCS), where sport and prevention are delivered in parallel; and Prevention Through Sport (PTS), where preventive strategies are embedded within the sport context. A structured narrative synthesis was conducted of substance use, intentions, and risk and protective factors. Results: Nineteen interventions (25 studies) met inclusion criteria. PS interventions showed little evidence of preventive effects. PCS and PTS interventions reported preventive effects across several outcomes, particularly for alcohol and tobacco. PCS effects appeared more consistent in the short term, whereas PTS showed more sustained effects across substances and follow-up periods. Effect sizes were generally small and heterogeneity across formats, mechanisms, and outcomes was substantial. Conclusions: The paradigms differ in sport use, the preventive mechanisms they activate, and outcomes. Sport alone (PS) shows insufficient evidence for recommendation, whereas combined (PCS) and through-sport (PTS) approaches show more promising patterns. This research contributes to a better understanding of the role of sport in prevention, helping professionals and decision-makers to design more effective interventions and make better decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Substance Use & Misuse is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
Be the first to leave a comment!
