View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Peer coaching, implementation support and organisational power.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Peer coaching, implementation support and organisational power.
Authors: Boulton, Richard (AUTHOR), Boaz, Annette (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Interprofessional Care. Sep/Oct2026, Vol. 40 Issue 5, p767-776. 10p.
Subjects: Power (Social sciences), Interprofessional relations, Human services programs, Affinity groups, Ethnology research, Scientific observation, Interviewing, Labor turnover, Patient-centered care, Organizational structure, Research methodology, Family-centered care, Time management, Social support, Terminal care
Abstract: This article looks at the effects of power (conceived as complex and multi-directional) on the collaborative, interprofessional relationships of peer coaches when delivering implementation support. The study conducted ethnographic observations, semi-structured interviews and documentary analysis to evaluate the dynamics of peer coaching during the implementation of an evidence-based programme, Patient and Family Centred Care (PFCC), to improve 24 end-of-life care services. The article draws on perspectives from critical management studies to offer insights on the effect of organisational power on collaborations during the administration of peer coaching. This article details the difficulties that organisational power structures posed to interprofessional peer-coaching collaborations. Many of the peer coaches found it difficult to place their advice in the existing ethos of organisations, existing organisational hierarchies, or collaborate in the midst of staff turnover and general time management outside of their control. These considerations meant that successful peer-coaching collaborations and the success of the implementation programme were often divergent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Interprofessional Care is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 196698434
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Peer coaching, implementation support and organisational power.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boulton%2C+Richard%22">Boulton, Richard</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boaz%2C+Annette%22">Boaz, Annette</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Interprofessional+Care%22">Journal of Interprofessional Care</searchLink>. Sep/Oct2026, Vol. 40 Issue 5, p767-776. 10p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Power+%28Social+sciences%29%22">Power (Social sciences)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interprofessional+relations%22">Interprofessional relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+services+programs%22">Human services programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Affinity+groups%22">Affinity groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethnology+research%22">Ethnology research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+observation%22">Scientific observation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Labor+turnover%22">Labor turnover</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patient-centered+care%22">Patient-centered care</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organizational+structure%22">Organizational structure</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Family-centered+care%22">Family-centered care</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Time+management%22">Time management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+support%22">Social support</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Terminal+care%22">Terminal care</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This article looks at the effects of power (conceived as complex and multi-directional) on the collaborative, interprofessional relationships of peer coaches when delivering implementation support. The study conducted ethnographic observations, semi-structured interviews and documentary analysis to evaluate the dynamics of peer coaching during the implementation of an evidence-based programme, Patient and Family Centred Care (PFCC), to improve 24 end-of-life care services. The article draws on perspectives from critical management studies to offer insights on the effect of organisational power on collaborations during the administration of peer coaching. This article details the difficulties that organisational power structures posed to interprofessional peer-coaching collaborations. Many of the peer coaches found it difficult to place their advice in the existing ethos of organisations, existing organisational hierarchies, or collaborate in the midst of staff turnover and general time management outside of their control. These considerations meant that successful peer-coaching collaborations and the success of the implementation programme were often divergent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Interprofessional Care is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=196698434
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/13561820.2023.2205879
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 767
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Power (Social sciences)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interprofessional relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Human services programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Affinity groups
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethnology research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scientific observation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interviewing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Labor turnover
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Patient-centered care
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Organizational structure
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Family-centered care
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Time management
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social support
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Terminal care
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Peer coaching, implementation support and organisational power.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Boulton, Richard
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Boaz, Annette
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep/Oct2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 13561820
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 40
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Interprofessional Care
              Type: main
ResultId 1