Personalization of Mail Surveys for General Public and Populations with a Group Identity: Results from Nine Studies.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Personalization of Mail Surveys for General Public and Populations with a Group Identity: Results from Nine Studies.
Authors: Dillman, Don A., Lesser, Virginia, Mason, Robert, Carlson, John, Willits, Fern, Robertson, Rob, Burke, Bryan
Source: Rural Sociology. Dec2007, Vol. 72 Issue 4, p632-646. 15p. 2 Charts.
Subjects: Rural sociology, Response rates, Mail surveys, Group identity, Surveys, Cover letters, Social surveys
Abstract: The effect of personalization on mail survey response rates was examined in nine studies that included 17 comparisons under several research conditions. A study of this variable across multiple experiments in five agricultural experiment stations was undertaken because of conflicting results from previous research and from concern that the effectiveness of personalization might have decreased over time. Results show that, while response to general public surveys appeared to increase modestly across all treatment groups, there was no positive effect for populations in which a group identity (e.g., Dear Oregon Gardner or Dear ATV Owner) is employed to address respondents in cover letters. Personalization appears to remain useful for improving response in surveys of the general public. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Rural Sociology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:The effect of personalization on mail survey response rates was examined in nine studies that included 17 comparisons under several research conditions. A study of this variable across multiple experiments in five agricultural experiment stations was undertaken because of conflicting results from previous research and from concern that the effectiveness of personalization might have decreased over time. Results show that, while response to general public surveys appeared to increase modestly across all treatment groups, there was no positive effect for populations in which a group identity (e.g., Dear Oregon Gardner or Dear ATV Owner) is employed to address respondents in cover letters. Personalization appears to remain useful for improving response in surveys of the general public. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00360112
DOI:10.1526/003601107782638693