Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Scale development of a measure to assess community-based and clinical intervention group environments. |
| Authors: |
Wilson, Patrick A., Hansen, Nathan B., Tarakeshwar, Nalini, Neufeld, Sharon, Kochman, Arlene, Sikkema, Kathleen J. |
| Source: |
Journal of Community Psychology. Apr2008, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p271-288. 18p. 4 Charts, 1 Graph. |
| Subjects: |
Group Environment Scale, Psychometrics, Clinical trials, Community organization, Medical experimentation on humans |
| Abstract: |
Though group interventions are widely used in community-based and clinical settings, there are few brief instruments for assessing the group environment. Two studies on the development of a brief measure to assess intervention group environments are described, and psychometric properties of the new scale are presented. The new measure is based on Moos' (1994) Group Environment Scale (GES). Participants in the studies were from two independent randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of group interventions (combined N=334). In Study 1 (N=139), the factor content of the original 90-item GES was examined. The scale was shortened, the response format was changed, and items were adapted and added to in an effort to increase applicability to community-based and clinical intervention groups. In Study 2 (N=195), the new scale was evaluated, the factor solution obtained in Study 1 was cross-validated, and subsequently the length of the scale was shortened again. The final scale contains 25 items with three subscales. Reliability and validity of the new scale was examined. Finally, the research and practice implications of the scale are discussed. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Community Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |