The practical value of the standard error of measurement in borderline pass/fail decisions.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The practical value of the standard error of measurement in borderline pass/fail decisions.
Authors: Hays, Richard (AUTHOR), Gupta, Tarun Sen (AUTHOR), Veitch, Jan (AUTHOR)
Source: Medical Education. Aug2008, Vol. 42 Issue 8, p810-815. 6p. 2 Charts.
Subjects: Measurement errors, Test scoring, Pass-fail grading system, Medical science education, Medical students
Abstract: Objective The purpose of this study was to explore the value of the standard error of measurement (SEM) in making decisions about students with examination scores at or below the pass/fail borderline in a new undergraduate medical course with an integrated assessment programme. Methods An analysis of de-identified, pooled data for borderline candidates was conducted to determine the SEM for each examination and the progress of candidates according to four score bands, from pass score ± 1 SEM, 1−2 SEM below the pass score, 2−3 SEM below the pass score and > 3 SEM below the pass score. The impact of poor performance in individual subject areas was also measured. Results Data for 1571 candidates were included in the analysis, identifying 132 students with borderline or lower scores, 45% of which were > 1 SEM below the pass score. By the third cohort the banding of students according to the SEM became highly predictive of candidate progress either through immediate remediation and re-sit examination, or by repetition of the year or withdrawal from the course. Conclusions The SEM is a useful tool for making confident and defensible decisions about how to manage candidates with examination scores at or below the borderline mark, as long as attention is paid to established examination design principles. The improved defensibility can be used to support a patient-safety focused decision tree or similar decision support model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Medical Education is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 33208308
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The practical value of the standard error of measurement in borderline pass/fail decisions.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hays%2C+Richard%22">Hays, Richard</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gupta%2C+Tarun+Sen%22">Gupta, Tarun Sen</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Veitch%2C+Jan%22">Veitch, Jan</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Medical+Education%22">Medical Education</searchLink>. Aug2008, Vol. 42 Issue 8, p810-815. 6p. 2 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measurement+errors%22">Measurement errors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+scoring%22">Test scoring</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pass-fail+grading+system%22">Pass-fail grading system</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+science+education%22">Medical science education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+students%22">Medical students</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objective The purpose of this study was to explore the value of the standard error of measurement (SEM) in making decisions about students with examination scores at or below the pass/fail borderline in a new undergraduate medical course with an integrated assessment programme. Methods An analysis of de-identified, pooled data for borderline candidates was conducted to determine the SEM for each examination and the progress of candidates according to four score bands, from pass score ± 1 SEM, 1−2 SEM below the pass score, 2−3 SEM below the pass score and > 3 SEM below the pass score. The impact of poor performance in individual subject areas was also measured. Results Data for 1571 candidates were included in the analysis, identifying 132 students with borderline or lower scores, 45% of which were > 1 SEM below the pass score. By the third cohort the banding of students according to the SEM became highly predictive of candidate progress either through immediate remediation and re-sit examination, or by repetition of the year or withdrawal from the course. Conclusions The SEM is a useful tool for making confident and defensible decisions about how to manage candidates with examination scores at or below the borderline mark, as long as attention is paid to established examination design principles. The improved defensibility can be used to support a patient-safety focused decision tree or similar decision support model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Medical Education is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=33208308
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03103.x
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 6
        StartPage: 810
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Measurement errors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test scoring
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pass-fail grading system
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical science education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical students
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The practical value of the standard error of measurement in borderline pass/fail decisions.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hays, Richard
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gupta, Tarun Sen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Veitch, Jan
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2008
              Type: published
              Y: 2008
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 03080110
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 42
            – Type: issue
              Value: 8
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Medical Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1