View in EDS

A Clinical Framework for Improving the Advance Care Planning Process: Start with Patients' Self-Identified Barriers.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Clinical Framework for Improving the Advance Care Planning Process: Start with Patients' Self-Identified Barriers.
Authors: Schickedanz, Adam D., Schillinger, Dean, Landefeld, C. Seth, Knight, Sara J., Williams, Brie A., Sudore, Rebecca L.
Source: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Jan2009, Vol. 57 Issue 1, p31-39. 9p. 1 Diagram, 3 Charts.
Subjects: Geriatrics, Quantitative research, Qualitative research, Patient psychology, Intervention (Administrative procedure), Health planning, Medical care
Geographic Terms: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To explore barriers to multiple advance care planning (ACP) steps and identify common barrier themes that impede older adults from engaging in the process as a whole. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SETTING: General medicine clinic. San Francisco County. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-three English and Spanish speakers aged 50 and older (mean 61) enrolled in an advance directive preference study. MEASUREMENT: Six months after reviewing two advance directives, self-reported ACP engagement and barriers to each ACP step were measured with open- and closed-ended questions using quantitative and qualitative (thematic content) analyses. RESULTS: Forty percent of participants did not contemplate ACP, 46% did not discuss with family or friends, 80% did not discuss with their doctor, and 90% did not document ACP wishes. Six barrier themes emerged: perceiving ACP as irrelevant (84%), personal barriers (53%), relationship concerns (46%), information needs (36%), health encounter time constraints (29%), and problems with advance directives (29%). Some barriers were endorsed at all steps (e.g., perceiving ACP as irrelevant). Others were endorsed at individual steps (e.g., relationship concerns for family or friend discussions, time constraints for doctor discussion, and problems with advance directives for documentation). DISCUSSION: Perceiving ACP to be irrelevant was the barrier theme most often endorsed at every ACP step. Other barriers were endorsed at specific steps. Understanding ACP barriers may help clinicians prioritize and address them and may also provide a framework for tailoring interventions to improve ACP engagement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of the American Geriatrics Society is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 35890617
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: A Clinical Framework for Improving the Advance Care Planning Process: Start with Patients' Self-Identified Barriers.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Schickedanz%2C+Adam+D%2E%22">Schickedanz, Adam D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Schillinger%2C+Dean%22">Schillinger, Dean</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Landefeld%2C+C%2E+Seth%22">Landefeld, C. Seth</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Knight%2C+Sara+J%2E%22">Knight, Sara J.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Williams%2C+Brie+A%2E%22">Williams, Brie A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sudore%2C+Rebecca+L%2E%22">Sudore, Rebecca L.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+the+American+Geriatrics+Society%22">Journal of the American Geriatrics Society</searchLink>. Jan2009, Vol. 57 Issue 1, p31-39. 9p. 1 Diagram, 3 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Geriatrics%22">Geriatrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quantitative+research%22">Quantitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patient+psychology%22">Patient psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intervention+%28Administrative+procedure%29%22">Intervention (Administrative procedure)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+planning%22">Health planning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+care%22">Medical care</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: OBJECTIVES: To explore barriers to multiple advance care planning (ACP) steps and identify common barrier themes that impede older adults from engaging in the process as a whole. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SETTING: General medicine clinic. San Francisco County. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-three English and Spanish speakers aged 50 and older (mean 61) enrolled in an advance directive preference study. MEASUREMENT: Six months after reviewing two advance directives, self-reported ACP engagement and barriers to each ACP step were measured with open- and closed-ended questions using quantitative and qualitative (thematic content) analyses. RESULTS: Forty percent of participants did not contemplate ACP, 46% did not discuss with family or friends, 80% did not discuss with their doctor, and 90% did not document ACP wishes. Six barrier themes emerged: perceiving ACP as irrelevant (84%), personal barriers (53%), relationship concerns (46%), information needs (36%), health encounter time constraints (29%), and problems with advance directives (29%). Some barriers were endorsed at all steps (e.g., perceiving ACP as irrelevant). Others were endorsed at individual steps (e.g., relationship concerns for family or friend discussions, time constraints for doctor discussion, and problems with advance directives for documentation). DISCUSSION: Perceiving ACP to be irrelevant was the barrier theme most often endorsed at every ACP step. Other barriers were endorsed at specific steps. Understanding ACP barriers may help clinicians prioritize and address them and may also provide a framework for tailoring interventions to improve ACP engagement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of the American Geriatrics Society is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=35890617
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02093.x
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 31
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Geriatrics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Quantitative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Qualitative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Patient psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intervention (Administrative procedure)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health planning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical care
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: A Clinical Framework for Improving the Advance Care Planning Process: Start with Patients' Self-Identified Barriers.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Schickedanz, Adam D.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Schillinger, Dean
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Landefeld, C. Seth
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Knight, Sara J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Williams, Brie A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sudore, Rebecca L.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan2009
              Type: published
              Y: 2009
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00028614
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 57
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
              Type: main
ResultId 1