Cognitive errors, coping patterns, and the therapeutic alliance: A pilot study of in-session process.
Saved in:
| Title: | Cognitive errors, coping patterns, and the therapeutic alliance: A pilot study of in-session process. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | D'iuso, D. (AUTHOR), Blake, E. (AUTHOR), Fitzpatrick, M. (AUTHOR), Drapeau, M. (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Counselling & Psychotherapy Research. Jun2009, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p108-114. 7p. 4 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Therapeutic alliance, Therapeutics, Information processing, Psychological distress, Mental depression, Cognition |
| Abstract: | Aim: This exploratory study examined the association between clients' assessment of the therapeutic alliance and their cognitive errors (CE) and coping action patterns (CAP). Method: Selected therapy sessions of clients (N = 26) were rated for cognitive errors and coping action patterns using the CERS and CAPRS methods (Drapeau, Perry, & Dunkley, 2008; Perry, Drapeau, & Dunkley, 2005). The therapeutic alliance was assessed using the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI; Horvath & Greenberg, 1989). Results: Following Bonferroni corrections, no significant relationship was found between clients' CEs and their ratings of the WAI. However, the 'Negotiation' CAP was associated with the total alliance score, and with the Task and Goal subscales. Implications: A better understanding of the cognitive processes presented by clients in session can enable clinicians to address these factors early on when the alliance is most critical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Counselling & Psychotherapy Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Aim: This exploratory study examined the association between clients' assessment of the therapeutic alliance and their cognitive errors (CE) and coping action patterns (CAP). Method: Selected therapy sessions of clients (N = 26) were rated for cognitive errors and coping action patterns using the CERS and CAPRS methods (Drapeau, Perry, & Dunkley, 2008; Perry, Drapeau, & Dunkley, 2005). The therapeutic alliance was assessed using the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI; Horvath & Greenberg, 1989). Results: Following Bonferroni corrections, no significant relationship was found between clients' CEs and their ratings of the WAI. However, the 'Negotiation' CAP was associated with the total alliance score, and with the Task and Goal subscales. Implications: A better understanding of the cognitive processes presented by clients in session can enable clinicians to address these factors early on when the alliance is most critical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 14733145 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/14733140902804276 |
