A Second Look at Debriefing Practices: Madness in Our Method?
Saved in:
| Title: | A Second Look at Debriefing Practices: Madness in Our Method? |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Sharpe, Donald (AUTHOR), Faye, Cathy (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Ethics & Behavior. Sep/Oct2009, Vol. 19 Issue 5, p432-447. 16p. |
| Subjects: | Psychological debriefing, Psychological research, Journal of Traumatic Stress (Periodical), Internet surveys, Human research subjects |
| Abstract: | This article is a reconsideration of Tesch's (1977) ethical, educational, and methodological functions for debriefing through a literature review and an Internet survey of authors of articles published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Journal of Traumatic Stress. We advocate for a larger ethical role for debriefing in nondeception research. The educational function of debriefing is examined in light of the continued popularity of undergraduate participant pools. A case is made for the methodological function of debriefing to clarify aspects of research participation. Recommendations are made to improve the conducting and reporting of debriefings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Ethics & Behavior is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 44205168 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A Second Look at Debriefing Practices: Madness in Our Method? – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sharpe%2C+Donald%22">Sharpe, Donald</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Faye%2C+Cathy%22">Faye, Cathy</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Ethics+%26+Behavior%22">Ethics & Behavior</searchLink>. Sep/Oct2009, Vol. 19 Issue 5, p432-447. 16p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+debriefing%22">Psychological debriefing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+research%22">Psychological research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Journal+of+Traumatic+Stress+%28Periodical%29%22">Journal of Traumatic Stress (Periodical)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Internet+surveys%22">Internet surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+research+subjects%22">Human research subjects</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This article is a reconsideration of Tesch's (1977) ethical, educational, and methodological functions for debriefing through a literature review and an Internet survey of authors of articles published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Journal of Traumatic Stress. We advocate for a larger ethical role for debriefing in nondeception research. The educational function of debriefing is examined in light of the continued popularity of undergraduate participant pools. A case is made for the methodological function of debriefing to clarify aspects of research participation. Recommendations are made to improve the conducting and reporting of debriefings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Ethics & Behavior is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=44205168 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/10508420903035455 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 16 StartPage: 432 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Psychological debriefing Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychological research Type: general – SubjectFull: Journal of Traumatic Stress (Periodical) Type: general – SubjectFull: Internet surveys Type: general – SubjectFull: Human research subjects Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A Second Look at Debriefing Practices: Madness in Our Method? Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sharpe, Donald – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Faye, Cathy IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Text: Sep/Oct2009 Type: published Y: 2009 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 10508422 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 19 – Type: issue Value: 5 Titles: – TitleFull: Ethics & Behavior Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
