Typography for children may be inappropriately designed.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Typography for children may be inappropriately designed.
Authors: Wilkins, Arnold (AUTHOR), Cleave, Roanna (AUTHOR), Grayson, Nicola (AUTHOR), Wilson, Louise (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Research in Reading. Nov2009, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p402-412. 11p. 1 Diagram, 2 Charts.
Subjects: Printing, Reading, Speed, Children, Comprehension, Computer fonts, Fonts & typefaces, Education, Sentences (Grammar)
Abstract: We present four studies indicating that the size and design of the typeface in textual material for children aged 7–9 may impair speed of reading and comprehension, and measurement of reading attainment. The first study compared the speed with which sample sentences were comprehended. The sentences were printed in Arial font with an x-height of 4.2 or 5.0 mm. The sentences were verified 9% more quickly when presented in the larger typeface. The second study compared reading age on the Salford Sentence Reading Test when the typeface remained at the initial size (x-height 3.3 mm) throughout the test, and when it decreased in size as usual. The average reading age measured with the larger font was 4 months older. The final studies compared the font Sassoon Primary with the font Verdana and showed that Verdana was read and searched more quickly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Research in Reading is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:We present four studies indicating that the size and design of the typeface in textual material for children aged 7–9 may impair speed of reading and comprehension, and measurement of reading attainment. The first study compared the speed with which sample sentences were comprehended. The sentences were printed in Arial font with an x-height of 4.2 or 5.0 mm. The sentences were verified 9% more quickly when presented in the larger typeface. The second study compared reading age on the Salford Sentence Reading Test when the typeface remained at the initial size (x-height 3.3 mm) throughout the test, and when it decreased in size as usual. The average reading age measured with the larger font was 4 months older. The final studies compared the font Sassoon Primary with the font Verdana and showed that Verdana was read and searched more quickly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:01410423
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01402.x