View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Development and validation of the Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ) in UK trainee clinical psychologists.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Development and validation of the Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ) in UK trainee clinical psychologists.
Authors: Palomo, Marina (AUTHOR), Beinart, Helen (AUTHOR), Cooper, Myra J. (AUTHOR)
Source: British Journal of Clinical Psychology. Jun2010, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p131-149. 19p. 1 Diagram, 4 Charts.
Subjects: Interpersonal relations, Supervisors, Psychologists, Statistical reliability, Questionnaires, Clinical psychology
Abstract: Objective. To develop a valid and reliable measure of the supervisory relationship (SR) from the supervisee perspective. Design. A cross-sectional questionnaire design was used with a repeated measures component for a sub-sample. Method. Qualitative data obtained from a previous study and from review of the literature were used to construct a 111 item self-report questionnaire measure [Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ)]. This was administered to 284 British trainee clinical psychologists. Eighty-five participants completed the SRQ a second time to establish its test-retest reliability. Results. Principal components analysis (PCA) identified six components of the SRQ. Three of these reflected the 'facilitative' relationship characteristics of the SR and were labelled 'safe base', 'commitment' and 'structure'. The second set of components reflected the educative and evaluative functions of supervision. These were labelled 'reflective education', 'role model' and 'formative feedback'. Safe base accounted for the greatest proportion of variance in SRQ scores (52 per cent). Analyses using the six subscales subsequently derived from the PCA, revealed the SRQ to have high internal reliability, good test-retest reliability and good construct (convergent and divergent) validity. A preliminary test of predictive validity was conducted. Conclusions. The SRQ (six subscales, total of 67 items) is a valid and reliable measure of the SR from the supervisee perspective. The present findings support existing models of the SR, and its distinct nature during training as an educative and evaluative process. The SRQ is a promising tool for further research, and is likely to be useful in supervisor training and clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of British Journal of Clinical Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 51594849
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Development and validation of the Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ) in UK trainee clinical psychologists.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Palomo%2C+Marina%22">Palomo, Marina</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Beinart%2C+Helen%22">Beinart, Helen</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cooper%2C+Myra+J%2E%22">Cooper, Myra J.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22British+Journal+of+Clinical+Psychology%22">British Journal of Clinical Psychology</searchLink>. Jun2010, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p131-149. 19p. 1 Diagram, 4 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interpersonal+relations%22">Interpersonal relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Supervisors%22">Supervisors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychologists%22">Psychologists</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+reliability%22">Statistical reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+psychology%22">Clinical psychology</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objective. To develop a valid and reliable measure of the supervisory relationship (SR) from the supervisee perspective. Design. A cross-sectional questionnaire design was used with a repeated measures component for a sub-sample. Method. Qualitative data obtained from a previous study and from review of the literature were used to construct a 111 item self-report questionnaire measure [Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ)]. This was administered to 284 British trainee clinical psychologists. Eighty-five participants completed the SRQ a second time to establish its test-retest reliability. Results. Principal components analysis (PCA) identified six components of the SRQ. Three of these reflected the 'facilitative' relationship characteristics of the SR and were labelled 'safe base', 'commitment' and 'structure'. The second set of components reflected the educative and evaluative functions of supervision. These were labelled 'reflective education', 'role model' and 'formative feedback'. Safe base accounted for the greatest proportion of variance in SRQ scores (52 per cent). Analyses using the six subscales subsequently derived from the PCA, revealed the SRQ to have high internal reliability, good test-retest reliability and good construct (convergent and divergent) validity. A preliminary test of predictive validity was conducted. Conclusions. The SRQ (six subscales, total of 67 items) is a valid and reliable measure of the SR from the supervisee perspective. The present findings support existing models of the SR, and its distinct nature during training as an educative and evaluative process. The SRQ is a promising tool for further research, and is likely to be useful in supervisor training and clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of British Journal of Clinical Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=51594849
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1348/014466509X441033
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 131
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Interpersonal relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Supervisors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychologists
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical reliability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Questionnaires
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Clinical psychology
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Development and validation of the Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ) in UK trainee clinical psychologists.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Palomo, Marina
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Beinart, Helen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cooper, Myra J.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2010
              Type: published
              Y: 2010
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 01446657
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 49
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: British Journal of Clinical Psychology
              Type: main
ResultId 1